Agreed Ruff. Everyone loves how they have played in the tournament. They beat teams 139, 43, 5, and 27 in the NCAAs.Remember the days when it was said Hurley can't win a close game......
It feels like 80% of the "analysts" are picking Illinois because they've been playing well. I feel like we have an answer for anything they can throw at us. I love this matchup. Teams that are willing to run the half court without pressuring the ball, bring it. That's where coaching matters.
Cool stat
The one thing I'll say about this Illinois team, is they do seem unflappable, starting with Wagler. He does have a very calm and cool way about him, never feels like he's playing too fast or stressed. I don't think they're going to be the kind of team playing stressed.And any lead will not feel safe for them after seeing how UConn game back vs Duke.
I'm curious if during the days when half of this board kept saying "Dan Hurley can't win close games" if they were thinking he was unlucky.I like our chances just fine, but it's also not crazy to think a team that loses close games is playing well but unlucky and a team that wins close games is playing with fire. Will be very interesting.
And yet people made that argument about our 4 seed National Champion too. I simply like the matchup and think it favors us. There's a certain type of team that gives us real problems, but Illinois is not that type of team.Agreed Ruff. Everyone loves how they have played in the tournament. They beat teams 139, 43, 5, and 27 in the NCAAs.
Compare that to UConn. We have faced teams 186, 30, 11, and 1. Big difference.
No one wants to hear it, but it happens all the time. A ball bounces one way and not the other. Fans always want to make it something innate, but close games really can go either way all the time.I'm curious if during the days when half of this board kept saying "Dan Hurley can't win close games" if they were thinking he was unlucky.
He's made positive contributions in the first half minutes he played in both the MSU and Duke games
I also like that fact that we have been doing all this with a hobbled Silas, and almost no Stew. We've been getting Malachi really good minutes, who is the kind of guard that will give Illinois trouble.Illinois doesn't play aggressive defense and doesn't force turnovers. Our offense runs very smoothly against those types of teams.
Bump KenPom. He never gets UConn right.I've heard on a few pods that UConn is 15th in KenPom net rating for just tournament games. Michigan and AZ are 1-2, and I think Illinois is 5. That's why we're hearing a lot of analysts pick Illinois; so much of their "analysis" these days is really just looking at advanced metrics.
No one wants to hear it, but it happens all the time. A ball bounces one way and not the other. Fans always want to make it something innate, but close games really can go either way all the time.
Someone, somewhere doesI mean this in the nicest way possible…. Who freaking cares?
I was in Detroit in 2009 with floor seats and I felt like I needed binoculars. It's a terrible watch unless you have amazing seats.Sat in the 100s for 2023 (tickets were like $100) and it felt so far.
Yes. But I don't like that the (wild)cat is getting one over on the dog.Does this mean UConn-Arizona on Monday?
Our 4 seeded National Championship team wasn't playing a Top 5 team in the Final 4. We drew a 5 seed Miami. Quite different.And yet people made that argument about our 4 seed National Champion too. I simply like the matchup and think it favors us. There's a certain type of team that gives us real problems, but Illinois is not that type of team.
Had to be a painful game to watch. Even more terrible with all the MSU fans around.I was in Detroit in 2009 with floor seats and I felt like I needed binoculars. It's a terrible watch unless you have amazing seats.