CL82
James Breeding sucks
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 63,726
- Reaction Score
- 250,125
Your respect is duly noted.With all due respect, shuttling the student section to Rentschler is a vastly different animal than shuttling the other 35k from off-campus lots back onto campus. If the idea is to build a 40k (or larger) stadium on campus, that idea should be dead on arrival. "Moving day" on campus was brutal enough, but to quadruple the population flow??? No chance...
I think we'll end up disagreeing on this one. Fan bases across the country somehow manage to be able to drive far greater distances to their campuses. I think that we can manage it as well. As has been stated above, an on campus stadium is an investment in the future. Kids will be invested in attending games while on campus and many will continue to so as alums.I think it can be done without a huge investment of road expansion. As I posted frequently on this board, Rutgers uses existing back roads effectively to move cars at the end of games by designating roads as dedicated exit routes and using both lanes. Army is an inconvenient drive along small winging road, yet they manage to get people in and out of their stadium. We could as well. That said it seems to me that technology park might well merit an investment in the supporting infra-structure. That would benefit the campus as well.
Keep in mind that we are all in agreement that the Rent is our home for the foreseeable future. It is a great place to see a game, comfortable with good site lines. But it does make sense, in my opinion, to identify an on campus stadium in our long term plans.
