Analytics site Torvik defines quality games as Top50 opponents:
Thank you. Very interesting and complex site. Others have cited it, and I'll have to become more familiar with it.
So, according to the Torvik parameters you selected, UConn is ranked 1 in DRB% and 31 in ORB% among the 85 teams who have played at least
5 games against Torvik's
top 50 teams.
Playing with the selectable parameters for minimum games and number of teams, the ranks of course all constantly change.
For example, when I changed the minimum game parameter to teams who have played at least
10 games against top 50 teams, UConn's DRB% rank stayed at 1 and the ORB% rank jumped to 8. But only 12 teams, some not really good, met that parameter. When I change the minimum game parameter to
1, UConn's DRB% rank changes to 10 and its ORB% rank changes to 74, among 311 teams.
In any event, I'll accept that your parameter selection in Torvik-world shows UConn to be the top D-boarding team and a very good O-boarding team when looking solely at UConn's games played against top 50 teams. The meaningfulness of these data depend on the accuracy and reliability of Torvik's algorithms, about which I have no knowledge or opinion. (I do know Torvik's rankings have never won Pilight's fun bracket in the NCAAT since 2004.)
This makes me wonder why UConn is a better D-boarding team than an O-boarding team. It's obviously related to the fact that the top percentage shooting team in the country (UConn) will have the fewest available O-boards, and the top defensive team in the country (UConn) will have the most available D-boards.