- Joined
- Feb 4, 2012
- Messages
- 1,262
- Reaction Score
- 1,222
Was that in the article or are you just being cute? Don't play with my emotions please.Sources saying that B1G and SEC both talking to UConn.
Go to NYT article thread and I posted the entire ESPN blurb there.Screw espn, somebody cut and paste that blurb please
If UConn were to join the SEC, I'll move back to CT and open a NASCAR-themed soul food shack in E. Hartford.
I do not believe the UConn to the SEC rumors are serious; but, it could serve as a warning shot to the other conferences to make a move soon, i.e. once the Maryland suit is settled. The last thing the B1G or the ACC wants is the SEC juggernaut linking-up with the NYC television market. Bad enough the SEC has a nose around the fertile Southeast recruiting grounds. Could force the B1G to make a play for UConn and an ACC school (or four) now, which would allow the SEC to grab a handful of ACC schools themselves in the race to get to 16 or 20.
To be clear--I don't think he opted for Louisville. Commissioners don't have as much power as we think, sometimes. I think he assumed they would add UConn when Maryland left, just as he thought they were going to take Syracuse and UConn rather than Pitt. It's just that some of his member schools had other thoughts and concerns.You would think that the ACC would learn something from Rutgers to the B1G. I have no doubt that Swofford expected Rutgers to be available for years to come, and now his league lost New Jersey and Maryland. Given a chance to get back in the game in the NY area...he opts for Kentucky, with a school that is a clear #2 in that state.
To be clear--I don't think he opted for Louisville. Commissioners don't have as much power as we think, sometimes. I think he assumed they would add UConn when Maryland left, just as he thought they were going to take Syracuse and UConn rather than Pitt. It's just that some of his member schools had other thoughts and concerns.
As for the rumors as a whole--they're obviously not real rumors. But the ACC intimated that they were taking Louisville over UConn and, to a lesser extent, Cincy, because the latter two schools had nowhere else to go, while the former had the B12. Anything in a major publication that suggests--even erroneously--that we could go anywhere else but the ACC has to scare them. They know they can be raided again, and despite what they'd have you believe, they know that once you get past UConn and Cincy, there are no other desirable east coast schools (sorry USF).
If we're taken off the table by someone and the ACC loses more than one school, they have to start looking at Temple, USF, and UCF--or take a school like UMass* because their academics aren't horrendous, or a school like Memphis because, despite their academics at least they have a live basketball program. Do they take SMU because there are decent academics there despite a program that got the death penalty? I mean, think about it, it's gruel on the east coast after UConn, and to a lesser extent, Cincy...
*I know they don't take UMass--but for all their talk about academics, after UConn, what is there? Although, I guess, once you take Louisville, academics go out the window...
Largely agree.Central Florida is arguably ahead of UMass in academics. It's not a terrible school, and better than USF. But your point is correct, and the ACC botched this from the beginning. Instead of wading into the midwest with Pitt and later Louisville, they should have stayed east and taken Rutgers and UConn. Leave the B12 some options in the eastern midwest, so that they don't come calling for FSU and Miami. Now they are running out of attractive options.
The Big Ten fans are the same. They would rather see BShe in the Big Ten before UConn. (desperate for Notre Dame of course).