- Joined
- Dec 14, 2015
- Messages
- 8,910
- Reaction Score
- 60,036
It isThat is not the case anymore with the NIT. The NCAA runs it and they actually have a selection process so I would not say the NIT is a lock just yet.
It isThat is not the case anymore with the NIT. The NCAA runs it and they actually have a selection process so I would not say the NIT is a lock just yet.
We're the NIT equivelent of Duke or UNC. Our presence means eyeballs and dollars. The NCAA always bows down to the almighty buck.It is
We're the NIT equivelent of Duke or UNC. Our presence means eyeballs and dollars. The NCAA always bows down to the almighty buck.
As of today, they are 69 RPI ranking...gonna call that the bubble.So who says we are officially on the bubble. A boneyarder? That makes it official? We won't be on the bubble unless we win 3 in the AAC tournament.
They don’t use the RPI anymore, they use NET rankings which we are 59th inAs of today, they are 69 RPI ranking...gonna call that the bubble.
I can’t agree more. As much as I would love to see us playing on Sunday. I have to take it one game at time. Let’s beat Tulane on Thursday to take on WSU on Friday. I’m trying my hardest to not put the cart before the horse.
RPI is irrelevant.As of today, they are 69 RPI ranking...gonna call that the bubble.
We have zero chance at an at large bid.
However if you want to root for something that might get UConn a bubble mention on Sunday, we are 3-6 vs. Quad 1 (Top 50) teams. Beat WSU and Cincy to get to the title game and lose to Houston (Tulsa won't be top 50), gets us to 5-7 vs Quad 1.
That would be bubble worthy had we not lost to St. Joes, been horrible on the road vs average teams, and finished fifth behind the three other AAC bubble teams.
If you want to wish for what might have been, two more preferably road/nuetral wins vs quality opponents likely would have put us in at 6-6 vs the Top 50, even with St Joes.
Who now is #49?Our Tulane win dropped us one spot from 49 to 50 in the KenPom.
Who now is #49?
Who had post #87 for this?What we can't overcome is losing 5-6 close games back when we were relying on Gilbert and Vital hero-ball at the end of games.
Why does ESPN have Memphis and Tulsa listed under “work to do” (aka bubble teams), yet no mention of UConn?
Tulsa’s NET is like 15 spots lower than ours, and we are neck and neck with Memphis. Just saying if they are going to put them on the bubble, we should be too.Because the only thing we could possibly do to get in is win the AAC tourney, so it's not worth mentioning.
BINGO! (said in my best steve harvey voice)Who had post #87 for this?
(Doesn't count if you phrased it "...back when nobody else wanted the ball to take key shots under 4 minutes.")
Our Tulane win dropped us one spot from 49 to 50 in the KenPom.
What people forget about the Xavier game is had we won, we would have faced Florida, not Miami. Not saying we wouldn't have won, but can't just assume we would have. I think the two that hurt more are Houston and Nova, as they were both road games and both games we had under control until late game meltdowns. Those two plus Indiana and I think we would be in.Three games we should have actually won: SJU, Indiana and Xavier. We wins those and a game or two in the AAC Tournament we get an at large. Probably a 1% chance we can fet an at large right now, but we have as good a shot as any to win the conference tournament. Can’t leave it to chance.