UConn - Minnesota post game thread | Page 3 | The Boneyard

UConn - Minnesota post game thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
LarryLegend said:
Geno has said in at least one press conference that he and his staff review video of the bench after every game, looking for bad body language.
Expand ...
The Hall of Fame coach can do whatever he wants. I’m talking about any of us trying to read some kid’s mind by how they appear in a 3 second TV blip.
 
I cannot believe how many bunnies we’re missing! Aaliyah has traveled an/or been tied up or fumbled the ball over the last three games more than I can remember in a very long time. I think she’s not quite settled in yet! She just seems a bit distracted and unsure of herself. Hopefully she’s working her way back though as she seemed better in the second half. Paige too looked off today, not that that would be a surprise. She still found ways to assert herself however.
I thought Minnesota looked pretty tough and well prepared and simply wore down as the game went on. They’re going to win a lot of games I think. They’re tough and well-coached! Our rebounding continues to be a concern. I hope Yanna can help out with that.
Finally, I’m wondering why Aubrey is absolutely refusing to shoot the open three? I‘ve watched her pass repeatedly when there was no player within 10 feet of her. So happy they were able to continue the tough defense from the last game! We will need it against our next two opponents for sure.
 
Few Thoughts:
*Great: the defense. Clearly Min. is not a great offensive team but the defense of UConn was suffocating.
*Real good: the Freshmen are playing and contributing. Love the confidence they all play with.
Not good: rebounding. Must get better in rebounding and it's not clear how as both WE and Ice are not leapers.
*Bad: the offense. Totally disjointed. No flow...
*Ugly: missing way too many layups.
We clearly need another reliable 3 point shooter.
 
cferraro04 said:
Wow, didn't see that coming...see what? I didn't expect Minnesota's defense to be that good...it wasn't a produce turnovers good kind of defense (only 13 turnovers). I would instead characterize it as more of a selfish, stingy kind of defense...the kind of defense that only allows their opponent to get 9 offensive boards most of them in late in the 3rd quarter and the 4th quarter. It was the kind of defense that limits their opponent in the first half to 25 shots while taking 38 shots themselves. It was the kind of defense that didn't allow their opponent to make a 3-pointer until the second half and held them to only 3-15 from three while they themselves took 34 threes and made 6 of them.

For UConn at the end of the day...offense = coyote ugly; defense = a thing of beauty. The defense won this game...UConn has a problem figuring out how to make up for Azzi Fudd's missing offense...however, 19 points came off the bench today...not bad but we are going to need closer to 30 points from the bench to be able to replace the loss of Azzi.

Well, a win is a win...until we get our rhythm and we get hopefully Azzi and Patterson back...we need to keep the "Ws" coming.
Expand ...
The deacon said:
What did Caroline do today to give you the impression she was lost? She played just 13 minutes, played solid D, had three rebounds, two steals, an assist, made one of her two shots and generally moved well. She also cut numerous times through the lane and teammates didn't pass it to her.

Those who were pointing to the sluggish nature of the offense should note Nika was at the helm for 37 of the 40 minutes. She did drive to the hoop several times and scored 11 points, but otherwise did little to inspire the offense.
Expand ...
Also missed a free throw and had two fouls including another offensive foul, and a turnover. Not sure if it was a step forward, but we can hope.
 
Three years ago, our typical pattern was to go into halftime with a double digit lead. In many cases especially in February and March the game was practically settled by the end of the first quarter. This season it looks more and more like the third quarter is the one in which we blow the game open. I wonder why the change. Is it a conditioning thing? Given D1 parity do we have to run opponents ragged before putting the game out of reach?
 
.-.
dtbtbtb said:
Few Thoughts:
*Great: the defense. Clearly Min. is not a great offensive team but the defense of UConn was suffocating.
*Real good: the Freshmen are playing and contributing. Love the confidence they all play with.
Not good: rebounding. Must get better in rebounding and it's not clear how as both WE and Ice are not leapers.
*Bad: the offense. Totally disjointed. No flow...
*Ugly: missing way too many layups.
We clearly need another reliable 3 point shooter.
Expand ...
What do you mean "another reliable 3 point shooter"? 3-15 today
 
huskyblooz said:
Were they Big10 refs? They let it get physical. Every cut, Every post up. Every screen, was met with contact and they let it go. Refs let them play. We have always been a finesse team. I dont know.
It was ugly from the beginning. Almost unwatchable.
Expand ...
Letting teams be physical can be said for just about every WCBB game these days! UConn may prefer finesse ,but has a long history of very physical players that have been mentioned on the BY numerous times. UConn games are no different than any other games these days whether it be physical play or officiating. I am not sure why some fans continue to insist otherwise.
 
Bone Dog said:
Three years ago, our typical pattern was to go into halftime with a double digit lead. In many cases especially in February and March the game was practically settled by the end of the first quarter. This season it looks more and more like the third quarter is the one in which we blow the game open. I wonder why the change. Is it a conditioning thing? Given D1 parity do we have to run opponents ragged before putting the game out of reach?
Expand ...
I don't think this is a mystery at all. This year, unlike in any recent prior year, Geno is playing his bench extensively in the first half, and in most cases, other teams do not have a bench to match. So when the starters come back in the 3rd quarter, they are much more refreshed and energized than they were in past years, or than their opponents (so far) are this year. That is why the big push comes in the second half.

It also matters that Azzi and Caroline (both starters) have been under a cloud so far this year, whereas the new players have been amazingly productive.

In the Minnesota game, UConn dominated in bench points by a margin of 19-2.
 
.-.
Rdkid said:
The Hall of Fame coach can do whatever he wants. I’m talking about any of us trying to read some kid’s mind by how they appear in a 3 second TV blip.
Expand ...
Don't feel that Geno needs to do anything new, just get more comfortable with this year's team and maximize the skills they bring. This is the best midrange team we have had in years so an examples would be more sets that get them open closer to basket, versus the current motion offense that revolves around 3 point shots. Nothing new for UConn, just different emphasis.
 
Three and 4 years ago the team was built around elite perimeter recruits. Two of the three Geno built the team around are hurt (Azzi) or ineffective (CD) for whatever reason. CD is a shell of what she was as a frosh. Bur as long as Geno keeps starting her, I’m sure he has an expectation that she will become a big time scorer that he recruited (whether that happens is a big question.).

Until Azzi and Caroline are able to be efficient as scorers ugly games like this are going to happen. Freshmen by their very nature are inconsistent. And until Geno knows he can’t rely on Azzi or CD – he is not going to change his offense much.

And we can’t just say “play faster.” Because the teams that are of enough quality to beat UCONN, they are quality teams for a reason. They just aren’t going to let UCONN run and get layups. Especially in halfcourt sets – the quality team is just going to sag and challenge UCONN other-than-Paige to hit outside shots.

Thus, the only way to counter that, is for UCONN to continue to work hard on their halfcourt offense.

Playing “faster” won’t be realistic vs quality teams unless either they want to play fast too or if UCONN is able to hit outside shots which means you can take quicker shots throughout the game. Otherwise—it takes time to work the ball inside for quality shots vs quality teams.
 
Last edited:
oldude said:
Don’t forget that an unranked Duke team took Stanford to OT in Palo Alto, after the Blue Devils barely survived at Columbia.

Looks kind of like parity in WBB….everywhere but Columbia, SC…..
Expand ...

No doubt about parity being the key word in the early weeks of the season- there are way too many instances across the country to argue otherwise. For those who expect UConn to look like a well oiled machine, especially on offense, I feel you are going to be disappointed early in season. My opinion, which is worth exactly what it’s costing you to get it, is that it’s hard to expect that when you have most of the roster just trying to figure out what exactly their role on the team is. The rookies bring energy because all of them are desperately fighting for PT, but like most freshmen they will be up and down like the fiddlers arm until they get more comfortable. Even the experienced players will be somewhat uncomfortable because their role has changed from last year’s squad. Nika is a perfect example since she is now playing with PB, and uncertainty leads to hesitancy. It will all play out but it takes time and some experimentation by the staff for it to happen. For those who think this player or that player should be getting more PT or is being shortc hanged, the coaches watch them for hours each day in a myriad of situations and are in much better position to evaluate than any of us who just watch games. As a player, team, coach, or program you are where you are for a reason, not that it can’t change. As one of the better coaches I was around used to tell his players- if you want to play more give me a reason to do it, and put it on film every day.
 
SEbluebood said:
Letting teams be physical can be said for just about every WCBB game these days! UConn may prefer finesse ,but has a long history of very physical players that have been mentioned on the BY numerous times. UConn games are no different than any other games these days whether it be physical play or officiating. I am not sure why some fans continue to insist otherwise.
Expand ...
This game was VERY physical. They allowed a lot on both ends.
 
.-.
What a day and what a game. Like a few pointed out, really was not expecting a 62-44 type game. I really thought UConn would put 80 on the board, if not more. Like a lot of people have stated, this was not a pretty win but a win, nonetheless. We will take it.
 
JellyBean said:
What a day and what a game. Like a few pointed out, really was not expecting a 62-44 type game. I really thought UConn would put 80 on the board, if not more. Like a lot of people have stated, this was not a pretty win but a win, nonetheless. We will take it.
Expand ...
Well, Iowa won but gave up 90 points, 113-90. Offense sells tickets but defense wins games
 
The UConn half court offense is sluggish and predictable as it has been for years. The team is truly effective offensively only when they push the ball. With this roster they should be pro active forcing the pace and pressing the entire game to create chaos, which would help offset the poor rebounding. The flow of the game tonight changed when the freshman brought energy to the floor in the third quarter. Far too often UConn (Geno) lets the opponent dictate pace as they did again tonight in the first hall. As a result, a team who did not have a single player who could make the UConn roster, held them to 26 points and was within three at halftime. The entire team flourishes in the open court.
 
I’ve resorted to twitter intel for Azzi updates at this point, but I’ll take what I can get…
IMG_4275.jpeg
 
.-.
HuskyNan said:
Well, Iowa won but gave up 90 points, 113-90. Offense sells tickets but defense wins games
Expand ...
They won by 23 points, so I would say offense also wins games. Hawkeyes offense beat the Gamecock defense last year! The “defense” wins games saying has some merit, but not nearly as much as given credit for, imo. The truth is that balanced teams do best.
 
Just a reminder they play these games, and Geno schedule as many different types of teams as possible, to prepare for the post-season. The team has a lot of new parts and are learning who they are and who they need in certain situations. Regular season games aren’t must-wins, they are learning experiences.

I hope folks don’t live and die with every game. Sounds very stressful
 
1). Like others, l was disappointed in the offense. It wasn’t just that 3-pt shots weren’t going in: most of the misses were way off. And too many missed lay-ups that really felt disjointed.

2). Unlike others, l was a bit disappointed at times in the defensive intensity. There were times l thought for sure there would be a double team trap by the mid-court line or along the sideline, but each time the Minnie slipped through.

3) l was puzzled by the Gophers substitution pattern with Hart (#52). I was at the game and will watch the Fox broadcast - maybe the announcers spoke to this.

4) Likewise, l was surprised they only played their guard Sanders (#30) a few minutes. She seemed to be a very good ball handler.

5) l don’t think I’ve ever seem a game before when we’ve had a double digit lead in the second half and took a shot with less than 25 seconds remaining instead of dribbling it out.
 
SEbluebood said:
They won by 23 points, so I would say offense also wins games. Hawkeyes offense beat the Gamecock defense last year! The “defense” wins games saying has some merit, but not nearly as much as given credit for, imo. The truth is that balanced teams do best.
Expand ...
I’ll rephrase - Iowa gave up 90 points to Drake. Not Duke, Drake.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,160
Messages
4,555,233
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom