UConn/KSU - 72-26

[alexrgct]

You probably think the women's team could give the men's team a run for their money

Of course they couldn't. Wonkster was referring to execution, scheme, discipline, and determination. A mediocre heavyweight boxer could learn a lot from a championship-contending flyweight, even if he could kick the flyweight's ass.

 

[UCONNfan1]

No, there's nothing wrong with feeling either way. There is, however, something wrong with going out of your way to show your ass and crap on the accomplishments of a bunch of young women who wear jersies that say UConn on them, represent the state with honor, graduate at nearly a 100% clip, and play the game the right way. And some on this thread have done just that.

By the way, this year's WBB team has only one player who was ranked higher than 10 out of high school, and she's a freshman.

If men's players stayed four years, there'd be a lot less parity. Yes, the talent pool is deeper, but the lack of elite players in the men's college game is a big part of it.

i actually agree 100% with you. my point was i don't see what the big deal is to those who want to crap on the women's program. no reason for that.

and actually, Doty and Hayes were right on the cusp of top 10, Faris was top 10 by a few (ASGR had her at 7), and Stokes was top 10 by at least 2 recruiting services. i'm also pretty sure Hartley was top 10 (ASGR in fact had her at #3). so they have a bunch of top 10 kids on the team.