Shooting, missing and finding (in the numbers) a men's national champion
What do the analytics say about who has won the 64 games so far, and who will win the final three?www.espn.com
greenberg adamant UConn a blue blood. i dont know if the proper video from espn will embed in the linked article.
The article, though, is pretty good, and gives the ideal Miami scenario: we go a bit cold, and Miami is able to generate enough non-3pt looks. Always possible in a football-stadium converted setting.Shooting, missing and finding (in the numbers) a men's national champion
What do the analytics say about who has won the 64 games so far, and who will win the final three?www.espn.com
greenberg adamant UConn a blue blood. i dont know if the proper video from espn will embed in the linked article.
Last 33 years, they've gotten to 11 Elite 8s. That's 3rd in the NCAA.Everyone has a different definition for blue blood, so I guess it depends on how you define it (most of the Kentucky fans in that thread believed UConn was absolutely a blue blood). To me, UConn is easily one of the best 10 programs of of the post-Wooden era (in no particular order: UConn, Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, Indiana, North Carolina, UCLA (mainly because of Wooden), Villanova). They win their 5th National Title, they are in rarified air indeed. Moreover, with Hurley at the helm, they can get to the Final Four again in the coming years. Lots to look forward to, so I am not going to worry about the blue blood debate. Safe to say, UConn is in the hierarchy of mens (and womens) basketball.
I am sooooo tired of the blue blood nonsense. When we`re winning we are, when we`re not, we`re not. At this point i really could not give a squirt of rats pisss just keep getting to final 4s and winning chips.UConn made its 6th Final Four in the last 25 years. UConn has been in 24% of the Final Fours starting with the 1998-1999 season. UConn has done this with three different coaches, which is just as impressive. Most programs that have made Final Fours with more than one or two coaches have needed decades and decades to do it. Indiana is an example.
UConn has been in 11 of the last 34 Elite 8's. That is an amazing statistic going back a long way. UConn has finished the season with one of the 8 best teams in the country about 1/3 of the time.
If this team can win two more games, UConn would join UNC, Kentucky and Kansas as the only programs to have won Championships with three different coaches. Kansas and UNC have to look back to the 1950's to find their third coach's championship. Kentucky has an impressive 5 different coaches winning championships, although not surprisingly, Calipari only has one ring.
UConn is in pretty rarified company with this track record. UConn is a Blue Blood.
The article, though, is pretty good, and gives the ideal Miami scenario: we go a bit cold, and Miami is able to generate enough non-3pt looks. Always possible in a football-stadium converted setting.
Then the only blue bloods are MSU, Duke and Kansas because indiana, ucla have all had bad seasons over the last 30+ years. Gonzaga has made 24 consecutive tourney appearances why arent they a blue blood?UCONN has not had a track record of winning since 2014. A blue blood needs to be good even when they are bad.
View attachment 85929
I agree. But I think the only way UConn loses the way they've been playing is a worse than usual performance from 3 and maybe foul trouble on Jackson and Newton. They went 7 for 25 against Marquette and still only lost by 2 (to a team significantly better than Miami).We are shooting the eyes out of the ball right now. I think I read 44% from 3 as a team for the tourney.
I am going to probably have a meltdown if Alleyne or Calcaterra clank their first three. But this group strikes me as one that’s going to keep hammering until they fall.
Your correct if you are comparing apples to apples. But we have been screwed by conference alignment and being stuck in the AAC. The so called Blue Bloods have stability and tons of money pouring into their athletic departments.
Exactly, couldn’t have said it better, I’d rather be Rodney Dangerfield than Ted Knight!!I’d rather not be a blue blood.
This program is about overcoming obstacles , long established hoops paradigms , new money as good as old if not better , left behind by conference realignment , relatively underfunded, that has kicked down doors with Calhoun and Hurley. We should reject and renounce any calls for blue blood status. Like Groucho Marx said ‘i refuse to join a club that would have me as a member.’
This is why I hate Kentucky. This is what “spoiled and arrogant “ looks like.
We are the northeast, supremely talented, tough, don’t give a %#*+ squad who beats the blue bloods in big moments. Tough PGs and superstars throughout the last 30 years
We are not relying on a different tournament structure (UCLA), a mediocre conference (Gonzaga), the GOAT repping our school (Jordan with UNC) or ONE coach (MSU, Duke) to be this great.
They can hate us for it, and good. %#^* em
On to number 5# in less than 25 years
I absolutely hate it right now lol. Everyone in the media and CBB fans everywhere are already anointing us with #5. We're doomed. Guys need to lock in.It is kind of fun to be Goliath sometimes.