- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,149
- Reaction Score
- 8,314
Providence is cutting it awfully close. If they don't get a high score for this season they are out.
Providence is cutting it awfully close. If they don't get a high score for this season they are out.
We will need a 969+ for the 2012-13 academic year (released a year from now) to qualify for the 2015 tourney.
PC rarely makes the NCAA Tournament anyway. An inadequate APR score would finally give them a legit excuse for not making it. Rather than simply having a bad team, per usual.
nope... next year we will be required to meet both the four year and the two year average...a 933 would give us a 2 year average of 940 which would also qualify us.
"For 2014-2015, the schools falling below the four-year rolling average of 930 would need a two-year average of 940, and by 2015-2016, the two-year average will be non-existent."nope... next year we will be required to meet both the four year and the two year average...
We will need a 969+ for the 2012-13 academic year (released a year from now) to qualify for the 2015 tourney.
a 933 would give us a 2 year average of 940 which would also qualify us.
nope... next year we will be required to meet both the four year and the two year average...
Thanks for the clarification fellas. Looks like one of our beat writer's was passing out bad info.Where do you see that. I see the following:
Academics
Change
Effective DatePostseason Access – APR Requirement
2012-13 and 2013-14 postseasons = either 900 four-year average or 930 average over most recent two years2014-15 postseason = either 930 four-year average or 940 average over most recent two years2015-2016 postseason and beyond = 930 four-year averageNew APP Penalty Structure and Filters
2012-13 and 2013-14 = 900 four-year average2014-15 and beyond = 930 four-year average
Thanks for the clarification fellas. Looks like one of our beat writer's was passing out bad info.
PC needs at least a 951 for the 2012-13 academic year or they're banned. It will be interesting to see how Ricky Ledo finishes up, as I don't think he or Sidiki Johnson completed the 2nd semester.
PC needs at least a 951 for the 2012-13 academic year or they're banned.
Fortunately for PC, it just doesn't matter.
On the other hand, Kris Dunn may get a get-out-of-jail-free card just when UConn might need him.
That's not good, right?Best I can figure UConn lost two points, 36/38 = .9473.
Had a scholarship roster of 10:
Based on that the total would be 40 points. Three transfers, two with the required GPA score to remove a point from the base. One didn't and is responsible for at least one of the two points. It's also possible Oriakhi's retention point was calculated differently than normal and all three transfers were OK. If that is the case than the lost points would come from the non-transfers.
[ ]Alex Oriakhi (transfer*)
[ ]Roscoe Smith (transfer)
[ ]Michael Bradley (transfer)
[ ]Jeremy Lamb (NBA)
[ ]Shabazz Napier (retained)
[ ]Niels Giffey (retained)
[ ]Enosch Wolf (retained)
[ ]Tyler Olander (retained)
[ ]Ryan Boatright (retained)
[ ]DeAndre Daniels (retained)
This past year UConn had 11 scholarship players:
So the base looks to be 44 points. Considering Evans graduated and the rest came back aside from Wolf. The two year base will be somewhere between 82 (38+44), or 81 (38+43) depending on Wolf. To reach a two year score of 940, UConn can only lose four total points (78/82 = 951) or (77/81 = 951).
[ ]RJ Evans (graduated)
[ ]Shabazz Napier (retained)
[ ]Niels Giffey (retained)
[ ]Enosch Wolf (???)
[ ]Tyler Olander (retained)
[ ]Ryan Boatright (retained)
[ ]DeAndre Daniels (retained)
[ ]Omar Calhoun (retained)
[ ]Philip Nolan (retained)
[ ]Leon Tolksdorf (retained)
[ ]Brendan Allen (one year scholarship)
If my calculations are correct UConn has already lost two points from 2011-2012. So UConn can only afford to lose 2 points from 2012-2013. If Wolf isn't retained and UConn loses the retention point for it, than UConn only has one point leeway. If Wolf is either retained or there is an exception for his situation than UConn has two points leeway.
Best I can figure UConn lost two points, 36/38 = .9473.
Had a scholarship roster of 10:
Based on that the total would be 40 points. Three transfers, two with the required GPA score to remove a point from the base. One didn't and is responsible for at least one of the two points. It's also possible Oriakhi's retention point was calculated differently than normal and all three transfers were OK. If that is the case than the lost points would come from the non-transfers.
[ ]Alex Oriakhi (transfer*)
[ ]Roscoe Smith (transfer)
[ ]Michael Bradley (transfer)
[ ]Jeremy Lamb (NBA)
[ ]Shabazz Napier (retained)
[ ]Niels Giffey (retained)
[ ]Enosch Wolf (retained)
[ ]Tyler Olander (retained)
[ ]Ryan Boatright (retained)
[ ]DeAndre Daniels (retained)
This past year UConn had 11 scholarship players:
So the base looks to be 44 points. Considering Evans graduated and the rest came back aside from Wolf. The two year base will be somewhere between 82 (38+44), or 81 (38+43) depending on Wolf. To reach a two year score of 940, UConn can only lose four total points (78/82 = 951) or (77/81 = 951).
[ ]RJ Evans (graduated)
[ ]Shabazz Napier (retained)
[ ]Niels Giffey (retained)
[ ]Enosch Wolf (???)
[ ]Tyler Olander (retained)
[ ]Ryan Boatright (retained)
[ ]DeAndre Daniels (retained)
[ ]Omar Calhoun (retained)
[ ]Philip Nolan (retained)
[ ]Leon Tolksdorf (retained)
[ ]Brendan Allen (one year scholarship)
If my calculations are correct UConn has already lost two points from 2011-2012. So UConn can only afford to lose 2 points from 2012-2013. If Wolf isn't retained and UConn loses the retention point for it, than UConn only has one point leeway. If Wolf is either retained or there is an exception for his situation than UConn has two points leeway.