- Joined
- Sep 6, 2011
- Messages
- 136
- Reaction Score
- 472
This thread will be gone soon, but I'm starting to understand what those posters meant by rape culture.
Nobody has to preface any of their comments. Rape is wrong and the person or persons who did it (if they did) need to be prosecuted. That's a given.
But until there is proof I'm not going to convict anyone. While rape is way under reported, there are also innocent people who are accused.
Nobody has to preface any of their comments. Rape is wrong and the person or persons who did it (if they did) need to be prosecuted. That's a given.
But until there is proof I'm not going to convict anyone. While rape is way under reported, there are also innocent people who are accused.
Says "was a player....". Not that it makes it any better. Just another kick in the nuts.
So you think a school official would tell someone to not go to police? That's the part I said was BS, but maybe that seems plausible to you.
It also alleges this, which seems like crap:
""The lawsuit alleges discrimination based on gender and retaliation in violation of Title IX, which guarantees equal educational opportunities to students at schools that receive federal funds. It seeks unspecified monetary damages and changes in university policies."
"This is not about whether rape or s e xual assault occurred," Allred said. "This is about whether the university has complied with its legal obligations under Title IX in the handling of reports of rape and/or s e xual assault, and that's very different."
"Most people don't even know this is possible … because it's a relatively new area of the law," she said. "This is the pioneering stage."
This is not a rape case, this is about the school not following proper procedure and a gender bias allegation as if the school is anti-women. But I guess Whaler believes it. The school is guilty until proven innocent. It's always nice when they say its not about money but of course they want money.
So you think a school official would tell someone to not go to police? That's the part I said was BS, but maybe that seems plausible to you.
It also alleges this, which seems like crap:
""The lawsuit alleges discrimination based on gender and retaliation in violation of Title IX, which guarantees equal educational opportunities to students at schools that receive federal funds. It seeks unspecified monetary damages and changes in university policies."
"This is not about whether rape or s e xual assault occurred," Allred said. "This is about whether the university has complied with its legal obligations under Title IX in the handling of reports of rape and/or s e xual assault, and that's very different."
"Most people don't even know this is possible … because it's a relatively new area of the law," she said. "This is the pioneering stage."
This is not a rape case, this is about the school not following proper procedure and a gender bias allegation as if the school is anti-women. But I guess Whaler believes it. The school is guilty until proven innocent. It's always nice when they say its not about money but of course they want money.
I believe the court can decide. You deciding out of hand that it's impossible with no knowledge of the situation... and deciding it's about money - is exactly the kind of behavior those nice people referenced in the last thread.
As for your first question - having an admin tell people not to go to the cops is probably the single most believable part. Don't have an opinion if it is true or not - but do I believe that has happened at schools - absolutely 100%.
You need to find and read the actual lawsuit that was filed today... My sense is it won't change your opinion but may give you some pause (or maybe not) on passing judgement either way.
http://espn.go.com/college-football...huskies-football-player-accused-s e x-assault
Angell says she went to police herself after her attacker returned to campus and a female police officer told her, "Women need to stop spreading their legs like peanut butter or rape is going to keep happening until the cows come home."
I know Attorney Gloria Allred is known in the legal profession as more of a publicity hound than a good trial lawyer - but if the above conversation is true UConn has a problem in the police dept.
Here's mine: This is completely gutless on Rose Ricci's part and damages her credibility, that of her other litigants and trivializes an important issue. Her "I feel invalidated all over again" sounds very hollow, melodramatic and if it was scripted at the Women's Center.
I think you have some issues here. Women's Centers script things like this?
http://www.courant.com/news/education/hc-uconn-title-nine-1027-20131026,0,7588288.storyRuskin - it was scripted. There is a whole underground movement to bring this issue to the forefront of the the higher education crowd and the public's mind. UConn is just one campus of many (USC, Emerson., Dartmouth, Swarthmore, Occidental, Uconn, etc...) where Title IX complaints are being dropped. It's become a cottage industry.
http://www.courant.com/news/education/hc-uconn-title-nine-1027-20131026,0,7588288.story