That would be a better advertising partner for the men's fans....NGL, thought Madison Reed was Ashley Madison and thought it was a really weird NIL and marketing agreement.
You betcha!I read it, this sounds like it's all for the women's program. Will the men's team be playing on Madison Reed courts in Hartford and Storrs?
you say it like it's a bad thing...You're thinking of Ashley Madison Reed, where you get to pick the girl and the hair color, but both last only one night.
you'll be an old man one day-hopefully![]()
Tons of old man yells at clouds vibes on this thread
Are you saying that, sponsorship money being near equal, a golf tournament wouldn’t rather name their tournament after Rolex as opposed to Charmin? I’m not a marketing expert, but I don’t think that the brands you are attached to in the public eye are viewed as irrelevant. But if others with marketing expertise know better, I’m all ears.Being concerned about a perception that UConn is a women's hoops school is comical coming off 2 men's titles. Would you like our basketball teams to make less money because then the football team looks relatively less bad compared to them? What kind of thinking is that. Not to mention that women's hoops has grown significantly in the last couple years and being positioned in a way where Bueckers can be a big ambassador for the school is a good thing.
The most important thing here is that I can't tell you who sponsors anything on other schools, because it literally doesn't matter. If they want to cut a check, let them. I promise you no one that is a fan of SEC or Big 10 football is going to care whose name is on Gampel's floor.
That looks awful and is distracting. Especially the huge blue box around the logo. They need to switch is so the name of the company is in blue and get rid of the huge box.If you’re wondering what it looks like on the floor, here you go
From Article:The naming rights to our arena going to a largely women’s products company will do more damage than good. I’m sure it was the highest offer, and I get why (because if you’re selling female products what better place is there) but with no idea what our options were I worry that the marginal gain will be offset by increasing the perception that our school is about women’s hoops and will never be a big time football program. Hope I’m wrong.
You apparently missed that this is a court naming rights deal, not an arena naming rights deal.The naming rights to our arena going to a largely women’s products company will do more damage than good. I’m sure it was the highest offer, and I get why (because if you’re selling female products what better place is there) but with no idea what our options were I worry that the marginal gain will be offset by increasing the perception that our school is about women’s hoops and will never be a big time football program. Hope I’m wrong.
I do remember Norm’s line on cheers. It was before UConn played anything on a national stage.You apparently missed that this is a court naming rights deal, not an arena naming rights deal.
You're also old enough to remember the cheers joke about the fighting insurance salesmen.
Count how many times you thought of it because of the big fat xL on the court.
There is your answer.
With golf historically being an elitist sport I get the point, but, as golf has spent the past fifteen plus years attempting to reach the general public, and as Charmin's customer base clearly exceeds that of Rolex, especially within the general public, your comment may be a bit dated.Are you saying that, sponsorship money being near equal, a golf tournament wouldn’t rather name their tournament after Rolex as opposed to Charmin? I’m not a marketing expert, but I don’t think that the brands you are attached to in the public eye are viewed as irrelevant. But if others with marketing expertise know better, I’m all ears.
LOL. The first time a men’s golf tournament takes a sponsorship deal from a toilet paper or a primarily female product, I owe you a beer. But if I were you, I wouldn’t waste my time thinking of where you want me to take you.With golf historically being an elitist sport I get the point, but, as golf has spent the past fifteen plus years attempting to reach the general public, and as Charmin's customer base clearly exceeds that of Rolex, especially within the general public, your comment may be a bit dated.
That's hysterical. Should be an interesting season for her.I see Ice has lost a leg.
It doesn't matter in this case. Except to old men, it seems.Are people arguing that marketing ties literally don’t matter?
And I didn’t believe it when some were calling her slow last year. I understand now.I see Ice has lost a leg.

Yeah there's an extra body part in there. When I first saw it, I thought Ice looked "different". Looking closer, looks like they added her in later. Shoddy work lolAnd AI did weird things with her right arm. Don't people scrutinize these things before they go out?
or bad PhotoShop skillsAI will do that to you.
The company paying the money is trying to get the benefit of the UConn brand, especially from the women’s team in this case. The entity getting the money is benefiting from the money…not the association with the sponsor. It seems some folks think we should get money and branding benefit.It doesn't matter in the case. Except to old men, it seems.