Regarding portal acquisitions...... I know we have sought a certain profile last 2 years and it has paid off (so why break it ?) .. Ultra-competitor, ice in veins, leader, older/mature, hungry to win on large scale as a team last 2 years... Undervalued & talented guards the year before.. If we are in need of 3 pt shooting (seeing CS TN exit might point to that.. hopefully AK stays) then fine, get that guy but be patient.. as Kansas taught us- being first doesn't mean you are right. If we get NT, we are not in this position this year, sorry. But what if the staff isn't sold that a YS/SJ is enough to win in the BE? Maybe we go after an established big who fits the profile instead. What is known, at this point anyway, is that thye will only supplement the roster through the portal by 1 or 2 spots, which is smart. 1 uber-talented freshman, 3-4 2nd year guys, 2-3 Vets, and the portal is the formula he speaks of.