UConn #13 in latest AP poll | Page 3 | The Boneyard

UConn #13 in latest AP poll

What I get out of this if we defeat ND and SC we will move up. If we run the table in the Big East we’ll be in the top 12-16 depending on other team’s performances. If we lose to an unranked BE team we’ll tumble.
Thought for sure we’d be top 10 going into this poll…
 
Pollsters are giving other teams the chance to be ranked probably higher than they should be because it helps in reinforcing the argument about college WBB - and MBB - that ESPN and others seem to have latched onto
Humor Boomer GIF
 
The coaches poll will be even worse. But at this point, UCONN is very close to, if not in, as a 2 seed. Keep taking care of business and we should solidly be a 2 seed when the season ends.
The AP or Coaches poll doesn't have any merit when it comes to seeding, that is the NET which UConn is currently #4. They would most likely be a 1 seed if it was selection committee time.
 
The AP or Coaches poll doesn't have any merit when it comes to seeding, that is the NET which UConn is currently #4. They would most likely be a 1 seed if it was selection committee time.
This seems a bit optimistic to me. Even with a NET rank of 4 two months from now -- which would probably mean we'd had a great conference season and defeated ND decisively and had no worse than a close loss to SC -- I suspect we'd end up just a bit further down the S curve, maybe in the 5-8 range, that is we'd be a 2 seed. This also assumes that other teams took a few losses in conference, which seems almost inevitable. For example, if we end up 27-4, I suspect Iowa would have to be 25-5 or worse for us to edge them out of a 1 seed. Same for Texas LSU and NC St. My guess is the 1 seeds will end up being SC, Stanford, UCLA and one of those teams, and we'll be somewhere below them.

And frankly, looking at Iowa's schedule (just as an example) I wonder where those 4 losses are going to come from. The likeliest candidates are IU and tOSU who both play them twice. But other than a surprising upset, I don't see any other strong challenges on their schedule. Same for LSU. They'll probably take a big loss to SC, and maybe a second one in the SEC tournament, but beyond that I don't see two obvious challenges -- maybe Tennessee???? NC St is the likeliest of this lot to lose 4 more games since they play several ranked teams in conference: Va Tech, Duke, UNC, Louisville, and ND. Texas maybe losses to Baylor again, and K St, but it would take a loss to Iowa St to get them 5 losses.
 
Last edited:
.-.
This seems a bit optimistic to me. Even with a NET rank of 4 two months from now -- which would probably mean we'd had a great conference season and defeated ND decisively and had no worse than a close loss to SC -- I suspect we'd end up just a bit further down the S curve, maybe in the 5-8 range, that is we'd be a 2 seed. This also assumes that other teams took a few losses in conference, which seems almost inevitable. For example, if we end up 27-4, I suspect Iowa would have to be 25-5 or worse for us to edge them out of a 1 seed. Same for Texas LSU and NC St. My guess is the 1 seeds will end up being SC, Stanford, UCLA and one of those teams, and we'll be somewhere below them.
Stanford will be interesting to watch in the Pac 12. At the beginning of the season i had them top 5 in the country but now I am not so sure. Their backcourt gives me a lot of pause. I could see them pick up 3-4 pac 12 losses which would have that Gonzaga loss loom large during seeding time. They only play UCLA once this season though which is probably a boon to them.

Too early to talk about seeding with this team though, especially with Aubrey out. Too much can happen in two months, not just to us but to the rest of the country. Two weeks ago Texas looked like a final four favorite but you see how quickly fortunes can turn on a dime in this this sport so its not really worth thinking about yet imo.
 
We're not going anywhere until we start beating some name brands. That's basically it. Beat ND by 30 in a couple of weeks and that'll get some attention. Beat South Carolina and that'll really get a lot of attention.
They better be happy with any win over ND or South Carolina. Both those teams will be a match up challenge with decent guard play. Ranking don't really matter for another month and as it stands I think that UConn will be at least a 3 seed which is about where they should be based on the early results.
 
.-.
Here's my ranking. It's based on a forecasting method and it's very UConn-centric in the sense that I asked myself who I thought the Huskies could conceivably defeat in March on the basis of what we're seeing now. Teams above I think UConn more likely than not wouldn't beat, and those below they would beat (more likely than not). There's lots of room for upsets here, and some teams, like ND, probably deserve a higher ranking but for injuries that may not be season long. That is, if Citron, Prosper and Westbeld are up to speed in a few weeks, they probably belong much higher. Net rankings in parentheses.
  1. SC (1)
  2. UCLA (5)
  3. Stanford (2)
  4. LSU (16)
  5. Texas (3)
  6. NC St (10)
  7. Va Tech (15)
  8. UConn (4)
  9. IU (11)
  10. Iowa (7)
  11. Baylor (8)
  12. USC (13)
  13. K St (9)
  14. Colorado (19)
  15. Michigan St (14)
  16. tOSU (17)
  17. Utah (6)
  18. Gonzaga (18)
  19. ND (12)
  20. Ore St. (21)
And a side note, I put NC St and Texas above UConn because they've already won games against UConn. But one might argue that they wouldn't repeat.
Baylor at 11 is too low. They have size and good guard play and owns a win against Texas and blew out an undefeated TCU team. I think you have UConn where they most likely will finish if they can find a way to beat ND and play SC kind of close.
 
Maybe we are getting treated like Florida State in football when their quarterback went down!
No we are not. Virginia Tech beat the #3 team and this bumped them up. This happens with any team that beats a higher ranked team. It’s as predictable as the sunrise. Notice that Kansas State was also jumped by VT, so this wasn’t about us.

As @DefenseBB pointed out above, UConn’s point total actually went up over last week. If it had been us beating a higher ranked team then we too would have jumped other teams that had done nothing wrong or bad.

If this thread is any indication, bring the popcorn just in case.
Popcorn for some, Valium for others
 
Aubrey being out doesn’t help us with the voters.
That's what I'm thinking. I thinking they are ranking them based on what might happen due to injuries vs What is and has happened last week in actual games played.
 
The important thing is Geno, the coaches and the players themselves don't pay attention to rankings. UConn's focus right now is as it should be on the next game and the game after that and after that culminating in the BE regular season and championship.
Yes, leave the pearl clutching and hand wringing to us "professionals". :p
 
Here's my ranking. It's based on a forecasting method and it's very UConn-centric in the sense that I asked myself who I thought the Huskies could conceivably defeat in March on the basis of what we're seeing now. Teams above I think UConn more likely than not wouldn't beat, and those below they would beat (more likely than not). There's lots of room for upsets here, and some teams, like ND, probably deserve a higher ranking but for injuries that may not be season long. That is, if Citron, Prosper and Westbeld are up to speed in a few weeks, they probably belong much higher. Net rankings in parentheses.
  1. SC (1)
  2. UCLA (5)
  3. Stanford (2)
  4. LSU (16)
  5. Texas (3)
  6. NC St (10)
  7. Va Tech (15)
  8. UConn (4)
  9. IU (11)
  10. Iowa (7)
  11. Baylor (8)
  12. USC (13)
  13. K St (9)
  14. Colorado (19)
  15. Michigan St (14)
  16. tOSU (17)
  17. Utah (6)
  18. Gonzaga (18)
  19. ND (12)
  20. Ore St. (21)
And a side note, I put NC St and Texas above UConn because they've already won games against UConn. But one might argue that they wouldn't repeat.
Not sure UCONN is beating Iowa, Baylor, Colorado, Kansas State. That's a tough sell in my opinion.
 
Not sure UCONN is beating Iowa, Baylor, Colorado, Kansas State. That's a tough sell in my opinion.
I doubt we'd have to play all of them, no matter how bad a seeding we got. Could we beat any one of them? I think so. Colorado may be the toughest matchup for us, though I think of their team as structured roughly similarly to Louisville and we beat them handily.
 
.-.
We only play one team ranked higher than us the rest of the season. By this logic, #13 is our ceiling.
No, the logic IS that at this point in the season you don't move up just by beating teams beneath you. However, teams above us can (and probably will) lose some games to lower ranked teams and we then could move up. If you look at the teams ranked above us, #13 is about right at the moment.
 
I doubt we'd have to play all of them, no matter how bad a seeding we got. Could we beat any one of them? I think so. Colorado may be the toughest matchup for us, though I think of their team as structured roughly similarly to Louisville and we beat them handily.

Baylor would be the toughest match-up in my opinion, they have size and excellent guards. But any of those first 4 teams listed below UCONN is a tough out. Would love to see those games though.
 
I doubt we'd have to play all of them, no matter how bad a seeding we got. Could we beat any one of them? I think so. Colorado may be the toughest matchup for us, though I think of their team as structured roughly similarly to Louisville and we beat them handily.

Colorado is far superior to Louisville. Vonleah and Miller inside would be a problem for yall. They have a legit pg (unlike Louisville) who is very good. Plus, their team has played together for a few years, unlike Louisville's patchwork roster.
 
Baylor would be the toughest match-up in my opinion, they have size and excellent guards. But any of those first 4 teams listed below UCONN is a tough out. Would love to see those games though.
Quick, aggressive opposing guards is pretty much our kryptonite. KK and Ashlynn may end up being the antidote however.
 
Quick, aggressive opposing guards is pretty much our kryptonite. KK and Ashlynn may end up being the antidote however.

Well good thing yall won't face anything like that until late March if at all.
 
.-.
On that note, Virginia Tech's next 3 games are Miami, FSU and Duke. Remember that ACC teams are contractually obligated to hand out “quality wins” to each other like it's a Sunday potluck. That's the only thing that can explain NC State's abysmal 4th quarter collapse and nonexistent defense on the winning play
:cool:
Just give Virginia Tech a week or so and they'll be due for their next egg casserole dish.

They are definitely going down to defeat in Durham... mark my words. I might just drive down to see a arse whipping in person. I could also see them losing at F$U. Miami will be tough, but at least the game is in Blacksburg.

Don't want to get this thread off track... but what exactly is egg casserole?? Sounds intriguing.
 
ND has a quick aggressive guard... just one. The rest of the team is rather plodding (in my amateur opinion). SC... I guess.
Meh knowing Notre Dame Miles will be back for that game. But I do think a player like Hidalgo will be a problem for us, similar to Harmon and UCLA’s guards. We will see.
 
We dropped because of a quirky circumstance. The only team ahead of us that lost was way up at #3, undefeated NCSU, which beat us by double-digits early on. They dropped, but not as far as where we are. The team that edged them at the buzzer was just behind us last week and jumped over us. No other team ahead of us lost last week.

Some other interesting observations:

--Of the 12 teams ahead of us, 3 are undefeated, 8 have only one loss, and only Va Tech has two losses. We, of course, have 3 losses.

--4 previously undefeated teams lost last week. Only 3 remain: SC, UCLA, and Baylor.

--We have 487 points this week and had 469 last week. So, we moved up by 18 points, but Va. Tech moved up by 107 points and, thus, jumped over us. So, we moved up, as measured by points, but moved down, based on relative ranking.

--Creighton is still ranked, despite a 44-point loss to us. Marquette is also still ranked, despite their second loss.

--Shea's Vanderbilt team is #26.

--Maryland is back among the "others receiving votes" with 2 points. They are tied with Fairfield, who also has 2 points.

--Tennessee still has 0 points. No voter thinks they are a top-25 team. They are not in the top 40.

 
Meh knowing Notre Dame Miles will be back for that game. But I do think a player like Hidalgo will be a problem for us, similar to Harmon and UCLA’s guards. We will see.
We will be able to out rebound them and get a lot of 2nd chance points.
 
--Tennessee still has 0 points. No voter thinks they are a top-25 team. They are not in the top 40.
Some really interesting notes you provided. On Tennessee, they're not getting AP votes but curiously they are #30 in Massey. Their NET ranking tanked in early December but has risen steadily from #96 to #67 in the past month.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,154
Messages
4,554,947
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom