- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,996
- Reaction Score
- 4,075
A women's CT state record that stood for over 20 years is broken by an athlete born male and you don't consider that "empirical evidence" ?
This was a Women's state level meet that was "dominated" (not my words) by 2 transgender athletes. What would qualify as empirical evidence in your opinion?
When/If transgender females overwhelmingly dominate over a cross section of athletic endeavors over a period of time, I will join the growing discriminating/segregating/whining chorus. Until then, I will stand firm with the belief that it is about hormones, not anatomy. Regardless of our opinions, it is a discussion/debate that has to be addressed.
When you have completed your study of the available facts then report back.