Now we're comparing players playing different positions at different schools under different coaching staffs and different styles of play? SMH
No, we are comparing how as top recruits (no matter what school or sport you choose) you are typically expected to perform up to your ranking and have some sort of impact early. Rankings can absolutely be flawed and wrong but that still doesn’t negate what coaches and fans hope for. Parrish was ranked top 10 in a class that featured Brink, Bueckers, Clark, and Van Lith. Watson was ranked top 20. In a class like that, whether it’s fair or not, a lot is going to be expected out of you from day 1. It sucks, but that’s just the nature of the beast.
The expectations for Paige were going to be different from Edwards simply because Paige had the #1 by her name. The expectations for Azzi and probably Ducharme were probably different from DeBerry simply because those two had #1 and #5 by their names, even though all 3 were McDonald’s AAs. Whether it’s fair or not, we can debate it until our faces turn blue. But, that’s just the reality of what comes AA nods and rankings.
It’s not like some of those players in this class didn’t have opportunities. Watson is probably the exception, but she was already playing behind several other posts from the moment she committed there.