- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,846
- Reaction Score
- 47,575
If you take the average dedicated road cyclist and compare him to the average dedicated mountain bike rider, generally, the road cyclist will have the edge in fitness and strength. It's a function of the activity, not the particular person.
A number of top pros have been mountain bikers - Peter Sagan, Ryder Hesjedal, Bob Roll, etc.
There is something to be said for long, sustained aerobic efforts. Anyone who has ever trained for a marathon or some other endurance event spends months putting out that sort of effort every week. If your plan has you running 65 or 70 miles a week, 55-60 of those will be relatively easy, another 5-8 might be near the lactic threshold and then a tiny fraction will be anaerobic.
And weight loss is a math problem. If energy out exceeds energy in, you will lose weight - despite the claims of fad authors everywhere, the laws of physics do not cease to exist inside the human body.
You took the words out of my mouth on weight loss. It is a math problem. Foods high in nutrients and rest will allow you to sustain the caloric deficit for longer.
Most of the people who think that road riding is an inherently easier workout are people that just haven't ridden road bikes hard enough.
This winter I am doing something different. Going to try and get in 6-10 cyclocross races and when that's done I will spend the rest of the winter on the trainer with a power meter doing lactate threshold. I do long slow rides in the winter on weekends and that ultimately leads to getting sick. Racing season starts here in the last week of February with some crits that are really more like road races.
Once the weather warms up again, I'll go back to the long slow distance rides.