Topsy Turvy Big East | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Topsy Turvy Big East

businesslawyer said:
Both are true. We sucked, Seton Hall deserved to win and we would have lost even if the refs called fouls like they had been called before conference play started. That is not an excuse.

Having said that, were both teams allowed to get away with huge amounts of contact that, prior to last night, were called fouls? Absolutely. How about if this year it doesn’t take us 8 friggin games to adjust to it?
Expand ...
Big East is by far the most physical league in the country, the refs simply let things go far more in the league than anywhere else. It's always been like this and yes it does level the playing field some with less talented teams but so what? Our staff and players know it and there's no excuse not to be ready for it, Hurley said as much in the post game. We weren't prepared for it last night and Clingan got hurt.

There's no reason we shouldn't be prepared for it in our other league games but we better hope Clingan is healthy and ready to go. I hope everyone now recognizes he's our most important player.
 
JohnnyJr said:
We’ve put up a lot of points shooting like crap from 3 before we just weren’t getting the paint points were used to as well
Expand ...
Yes. The guy who usually gets those points only played half the game. While he was in he seemed to score whenever he wanted.
 
ibleedhuskyblue said:
Yes. The guy who usually gets those points only played half the game. While he was in he seemed to score whenever he wanted.
Expand ...
We also usually get our share of layups and dunks that weren’t there last night from anyone else.
 
AntG168 said:
We’re 10-2. I wouldn’t say the “book is out” on how to beat us. Unless the book is titled, “Make Clingan sprain his ankle” or “rely on Cam Spencer, Karaban, and Ball missing WIDE open shots”. We didn’t play well. That won’t happen often
Expand ...
You don't think we can have an off shooting night again? That was the benefit of AS last year...we could always dump it inside for a bucket.
 
Mr. French said:
I think there’s a difference between noting how they consistently call games differently and thinking it’s a giant conspiracy against just UConn.

I also don’t see much of that second thought.
Expand ...
It is both the case that:
1) Big East refs call games consistently in a way that elevates the also-rans and hurts our free-flowing style of play, and
2) Some Big East refs have antipathy towards our program in particular and disfavor us in 50/50 calls, especially on the road
 
Tenspro2002 said:
It is both the case that:
1) Big East refs call games consistently in a way that elevates the also-rans and hurts our free-flowing style of play, and
2) Some Big East refs have antipathy towards our program in particular and disfavor us in 50/50 calls, especially on the road
Expand ...
Why are they calling games this way though? I mean the conference can’t believe that these rock fights are better viewing than the high scoring out of conference games we’ve seen throughout the NCAA this year. Maybe they like being able to say the third or fourth big East team won it all when we do it lol
 
You may love the Big East.

But make no mistake, the Big East hates UConn. They don't appreciate that we dominate the national spotlight. The refs absolutely give the benefit of the doubt to our opponents. The league treats us like second class citizens. Dave Gavitt formed the Big East to protect Providence basketball. Has it really changed?

The only thing they like is the money we pump into the conference.
 
shizzle787 said:
Every Big East team struggles on the road. It's not just us.
Expand ...
yeah it’s the true sign of talent in a league to win road games in conference.

if you don’t have next level nba talent and elite shot makers then you won’t win on the road and the big east has next to none of that.

there’s only maybe 3 nba players in the whole conference and two of them have been battling injuries.

calling a league “physical” is code for no talent or skill. sad.
 
kobe said:
yeah it’s the true sign of talent in a league to win road games in conference.

if you don’t have next level nba talent and elite shot makers then you won’t win on the road and the big east has next to none of that.

there’s only maybe 3 nba players in the whole conference and two of them have been battling injuries.

calling a league “physical” is code for no talent or skill. sad.
Expand ...
Did your wife leave you for a female life partner? You didn’t use to be at all like this new persona.
 
Tenspro2002 said:
Big East refs didn't cost us the game, but they absolutely have it out for us, still, especially on the road.
Expand ...
I also feel that the refs have a major affect on our games, but no way I believe the refs have it out for UConn, or any other team for that matter. Nor do I think we win or lose depending on how the refs call a game. Refs are probably 33% responsible and not just negative but positively too. All IMHO.
 
kobe said:
yeah it’s the true sign of talent in a league to win road games in conference.

if you don’t have next level nba talent and elite shot makers then you won’t win on the road and the big east has next to none of that.

there’s only maybe 3 nba players in the whole conference and two of them have been battling injuries.

calling a league “physical” is code for no talent or skill. sad.
Expand ...
There are at least 3 nba players just on UConn’s roster alone.

Every post from you is not only wrong but it’s actually quite depressing to read.
I feel bad for you. It is easy to tell you are sad and lonely man.
 
SeattleHoop said:
There are at least 3 nba players just on UConn’s roster alone.

Every post from you is not only wrong but it’s actually quite depressing to read.
I feel bad for you. It is easy to tell you are sad and lonely man.
Expand ...

I don't mind the trolling I just wish the shtick was even remotely amusing or entertaining.
 
Viet Vet said:
At ease with the ref talk. It's sour grapes and tiresome.
Expand ...
Good lord. No one is saying we lost because of the refs. All anyone(including Hurley) is saying is that our guys didn’t seem prepared for the the drastic difference in the way the game would be called compared to non con. It’s not acceptable especially after last year. But it’s not an excuse. It’s context.

Would you disagree that a more physical and rugged game benefits the less skilled and talented teams?
 
AntG168 said:
Good lord. No one is saying we lost because of the refs. All anyone(including Hurley) is saying is that our guys didn’t seem prepared for the the drastic difference in the way the game would be called compared to non con. It’s not acceptable especially after last year. But it’s not an excuse. It’s context.

Would you disagree that a more physical and rugged game benefits the less skilled and talented teams?
Expand ...
All of these things are true:
1) we would have lost last night with any kind of officiating, including like we got in the OOC, where we performed well
2) the consistent style of refereeing in the Big East hurts us uniformly and benefits many of the lesser programs in the conference
3) beyond this, many Big East officials are, in fact, biased against us/Hurley

That #1 is true does not mean that #2 or #3 is false. Acknowledging #2 or #3 also does not mean that we are denying #1.
 
housekeys said:
I also feel that the refs have a major affect on our games, but no way I believe the refs have it out for UConn, or any other team for that matter. Nor do I think we win or lose depending on how the refs call a game. Refs are probably 33% responsible and not just negative but positively too. All IMHO.
Expand ...
If the refs have a major effect on our game, and 33% is significant, then they can certainly affect the outcome of the game. Even if it's not intentional.
 
kobe said:
yeah it’s the true sign of talent in a league to win road games in conference.

if you don’t have next level nba talent and elite shot makers then you won’t win on the road and the big east has next to none of that.

there’s only maybe 3 nba players in the whole conference and two of them have been battling injuries.

calling a league “physical” is code for no talent or skill. sad.
Expand ...
LOL Cincy was literally known for being “physical” in the AAC…..
 
Kolumbo said:
If the refs have a major effect on our game, and 33% is significant, then they can certainly affect the outcome of the game. Even if it's not intentional.
Expand ...
By 33% I mean it is 1 of 3 components (the others being prep/skill/talent and game day intensity - disparities). It is impossible to predict or summarize the effects of officiating on an outcome. I would imagine in the absence of talent and intensity disparities, officiating will play a larger role. A large talent gap usually overcomes poor officiating etc. IMO.
 
AntG168 said:
Good lord. No one is saying we lost because of the refs. All anyone(including Hurley) is saying is that our guys didn’t seem prepared for the the drastic difference in the way the game would be called compared to non con. It’s not acceptable especially after last year. But it’s not an excuse. It’s context.

Would you disagree that a more physical and rugged game benefits the less skilled and talented teams?
Expand ...
No. If Hurley is, in fact, saying that our guys didn't seem prepared for the "drastic difference in the way the game would be called"...........................that falls on Hurley, not the refs. Of course, a more physical and rugged game benefits the lesser skilled and talented teams. The coaching staff must prepare its team to react accordingly.
 
businesslawyer said:
Did your wife leave you for a female life partner? You didn’t use to be at all like this new persona.
Expand ...
Do you believe he'd be more pleasant if she left him for another man?
 

Online statistics

Members online
226
Guests online
2,793
Total visitors
3,019
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Share This Page

Forum statistics

Threads
164,243
Messages
4,388,511
Members
10,196
Latest member
ArtTheFan


.
..
Top Bottom