I realize that fatigue should have affected both teams, but still, in the first half when presumably neither team was overly fatigued, USF was held to 23 points. I think UConn's defensive effectiveness relies on high intensity, which did appear not to be present in the second half. As I said, I'm sure a double-digit lead contributed to UConn's inability to "play through" their fatigue, whereas USF was definitely playing to impress the Selection Committee and even possibly win the game.
Regarding OldAlum's comment about the officiating and specifically the call on Stokes, it is true that UConn had many more field goals than USF and the closeness in the score was attributable to USF shooting many more free throws. Not exactly what you would expect with "home cooking". However, while I thought the call on Kiah Stokes near the end of the game was really bad when I saw it live, I changed my mind when I watched the replay in super-slow-motion. Kiah's arm did make contact with the shooter's forehead before the shot was released, and then it came over and touched the shooter's arm as the ball was being released. It was actually a valid call. Even though I thought I read Kiah's lips saying "You cannot be serious!" to the official after the play (channeling her inner McEnroe).