Thoughts/Analysis on the ACC heading into 2025-26 | Page 8 | The Boneyard
.-.

Thoughts/Analysis on the ACC heading into 2025-26

I think without a doubt the landscape is changing. It’s already happened IMO. TCU is a great example. Clearly they have put resources into the WBB program. This isn’t simply a case of having a couple of good players in a recruiting class and that core having a moment. While it’s been only 2 years now, these are completely different rosters and cores. They went out and landed Hailey Van Lith last year and I’d guess that wasn’t cheap. This year went got Suarez who I know for a fact NC State wanted and I’m sure other programs did as well. And then got Olivia Miles from Notre Dame. Miles and Hailey Van Lith specifically were very known commodities who i can’t imagine came cheap. TCU has a great coach and also have invested in NIL for WBB and as long as that stays, they will stay in the national landscape.

The ACC is struggling this year in large part because they lost top end coaching and players over the last 2 years. And I don’t mean to graduation and retirement. VT was a national player under Kenny Brooks, he leaves for Kentucky and a pay raise and took his best player with him. It’s no coincidence that Kentucky is back on the map and VT has fallen off. FSU and ND in theory had 2 of the top 5 returning players in the nation this year in Latson and Miles. Instead of being in the ACC they are now in other conferences. Saurez, Koval, Kara Dunn, Tyana Todd, Lattimore, Tonie Morgan, Nya Robertson, Danielle Carnegie and Okananwa are other examples of top talent leaving the conference.

It’s normal in today’s world to lose players, but the thing is the conference didn’t replace with the same type talent. Pierre coming to State is about the lone example of incoming upgrades. Skylar Jones, Ra Shaya Kyle, Iyana Moore, Laila Phelia and Sa’Myah Smith are the only other ones even in the conversation.

FSU, Georgia Tech and Virginia Tech are all examples of players and coaches leaving that have severely hampered their immediate futures. Notre Dame too.

It does appear Clemson is on the rise, Miami and UVa also seem to have put money into their programs. The ACC has a brighter future ahead with some nice recruiting classes coming in next year, the question will be can they keep that talent when it blossoms? Will programs put the necessary money up to retain those star recruits when they are rising juniors and seniors and TCU, LSU, SC, USC and the like come calling with big checks? I hope so. ACC WBB has been extremely fun over the years and highly competitive nationally. I hope it doesn’t turn into a feeder conference for other programs.
I have to protest the Clemson is on the rise comment.

They've not really been in a position to challenge in any of their three tests this season.

Let's not call a team on the rise till they actually do something.

Especially Clemson. Harrumph.
 
I have to protest the Clemson is on the rise comment.

They've not really been in a position to challenge in any of their three tests this season.

Let's not call a team on the rise till they actually do something.

Especially Clemson. Harrumph.
That’s fair. I guess I’m looking more at their recruiting uptick and projecting, and I’m also grading on a scale. But yeah, they haven’t proven anything on the court at this point to say they are different than most any other Clemson team in recent memory.
 
The ACC-SEC Challenge is expected to be a bloodbath, but the ACC further shot themselves in the foot today w/ BC getting hammered by Quinnipiac and Wake Forest finally losing a game...to William & Mary who was only 2-4 prior to today.
 
That’s fair. I guess I’m looking more at their recruiting uptick and projecting, and I’m also grading on a scale. But yeah, they haven’t proven anything on the court at this point to say they are different than most any other Clemson team in recent memory.
The previous coach was able to bring in burger girls and they still sucked.

This coach hasn't done anything to show that he's going to be markedly better.
 
During the preseason, there was so much hype around Miami, Virginia, Clemson, and Stanford being much improved.

Still waiting on proof of this "improvement".
 


Look at that list. Should be a 3-4 bid league imo. NC State, Louisville, Notre Dame, North Carolina. And maybe only one of them hosting.
 
.-.


Look at that list. Should be a 3-4 bid league imo. NC State, Louisville, Notre Dame, North Carolina. And maybe only one of them hosting.

The ACC teams who lost to those schools will most likely NOT be playing in the tournament but to limit the conference to 3 or 4 teams based on the lower echelon teams losing multiple games to schools they shouldn't is flat out ridiculous. Casting way too wide of a net way too early in the season. If you're paying attention prior to today's games the ACC has played 20 ranked teams combined spread over 10 schools, the Big Ten has played 16 ranked teams spread over 9 schools, The SEC has played 10 ranked teams spread over a whopping 5 schools, and the Big 12 has played 9 ranked teams spread over 7 schools. The ACC is certainly willing at least to play ranked teams. Seems like some of the other conferences are full of teams afraid of the challenge or the risk of losing.
 

Online statistics

Members online
92
Guests online
4,888
Total visitors
4,980

Forum statistics

Threads
165,534
Messages
4,442,668
Members
10,310
Latest member
Showme789


Top Bottom