Thoughts about this recruiting class! | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Thoughts about this recruiting class!

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,085
Reaction Score
6,339
If you are losing 8 starters on the worst D in the nation, are you really losing anything?

Problem to me is that don't believe coaches gave players best chance to win with actual schemes used each down. In FBS championship game both teams were shown to use 3-4-4 but when seeing them line up play by play almost never saw less then 4 or 5 guys at line of scrimmage and 7 or 8 in the box. UConn actually lined up often with 3 on line of scrimmage, 3 linebackers spread off line scrimmage and 5 guys back. In the UConn defense scheme it allowed not deception as to where defense might be attacking and allowed offensive opponent to pick weaknesses apart. Having 5 guys back was pretty useless as they played so far off WR and/or there was so little pass rush (it was actually funny/sad often watching UConn's slow DL trying to catch the opponent QB) the opposing QB might as well have been wearing a red "not tackle allowed" shirt.
Defensive coaching was far worse than the talent, unless this changes (and why would it if coaches think it's all on the players), defense will only look statistically better if UConn's offense spends more time on field due to ball control.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,655
Reaction Score
70,276
Familiarity may help.

I see no one on the roster that can come close to matching the productivity of Foley, Ormsby, Luke Zola, Junior Joseph and dare I say it Jamar Summers.

I'm aware guys can improve, but if you ask me how they could be worse, that's my answer.

I agree with Foley and Luke. Ormsby disappeared for long stretches. I think Jones comes in and replaces Foley day one. If there is one decent pass rusher in the incoming group. It's a net plus.

Joseph, good player, could tackle and hit but his lack of speed was a problem. The young LBs are more athletic than the group they are replacing. Summers never came close to duplicating his sophomore season. I think he is easily replaced. Edsall played a lot of guys and with injuries the defensive backfield, he got a pretty good look at our secondary.

IMHO, then is no reason this defense can't improve from a personnel perspective.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,831
Reaction Score
10,379
It all comes down to DL to me. Need to find a rotation of players and I just don’t see any right now outside of Murphy.

We can absolutely improve in the secondary and linebacker positions even though we have lost some players there.

HCRE indicated he was in touch with a few grad transfers. My hope is they are all d linemen.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
21,048
Reaction Score
47,646
I agree with Foley and Luke. Ormsby disappeared for long stretches. I think Jones comes in and replaces Foley day one. If there is one decent pass rusher in the incoming group. It's a net plus.

Joseph, good player, could tackle and hit but his lack of speed was a problem. The young LBs are more athletic than the group they are replacing. Summers never came close to duplicating his sophomore season. I think he is easily replaced. Edsall played a lot of guys and with injuries the defensive backfield, he got a pretty good look at our secondary.

IMHO, then is no reason this defense can't improve from a personnel perspective.
I thought Ormsby was the more consistent of the two DEs by a pretty good margin. Luke really struggled this past year in the 3 3 5. Would get washed down an awful lot and not keep contain at all. We will see. I dont expect these incoming players to physically strong enough to replace those guys and be an improvement..
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,831
Reaction Score
10,379
I thought Ormsby was the more consistent of the two DEs by a pretty good margin. Luke really struggled this past year in the 3 3 5. Would get washed down an awful lot and not keep contain at all. We will see. I dont expect these incoming players to physically strong enough to replace those guys and be an improvement..

Agreed. I think Ormsby had a solid season. He just struggled to break down in open space when he had qb in sight. Luke lacked explosion. Never stopped working though.

We need to find a pass rusher. Badly.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
8,798
Reaction Score
15,872
Agreed. I think Ormsby had a solid season. He just struggled to break down in open space when he had qb in sight. Luke lacked explosion. Never stopped working though.

We need to find a pass rusher. Badly.
Agreed... Need a transfer to help us right away at that spot on the DL.... an edge rusher with a little more speed than we've had in the past several coaching stints...
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
918
Reaction Score
3,849
If you are losing 8 starters on the worst D in the nation, are you really losing anything?
The 3 defensive lineman are a big loss for next year mainly because a lack of replacements on our current roster. The same hold true with our linebackers although I don't feel as much concern as I do for the defensive line. Over time Edsall may replace them with better players. My concern is that our defense will worst next year than this year even though that may be hard for the fans to fathom based on what they saw on the field in 2017. Diaco's recruiting on the defensive side of the ball was horrible. That is why our defense is in such a mess. I liked the two defensive linemen in the current recruiting class. However, will either one of them be able to contribute in 2018? My guess is that Edsall will be forced to burn both of their red shirts even if they are not ready to make major contributions to our defense. On the bright side, our offense may be better next year. We may be watching a lot of 70 to 40 games next season.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
4,915
Reaction Score
5,364
Great points. I'm worried, not panicked. The major knock we all had on RE 1.0 was the stilted offense, and run, run, pass one dimensional play calling. With him effectively taking the helm and installing a puppet, the offense will be RE's design. In the AAC, I think the notion we can grind out teams and keep them off the field in low scoring affairs is a nice theory but doesn't work well in practice. I'm pretty certain RE puts a better product in the field year over year. He's the man for the job. But, the environment has changed from the old Big East style of play. He struggled at Maryland I think for roughly the same reasons. Ironically, I think he would have done well at Maryland in the B1G with some time since it's much closer to his preferred style of football.
Interesting theory in that he might have done better with Maryland in the B1G.
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
510
Reaction Score
826
Aw do the words give you the sadz.

I’ll try to just post nonsense cuz I want it to be true.

I think UConn will win the Super Bowl next year!!

So we’re skipping P5 and going to the NFL? AFC or NFC.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
454
Reaction Score
1,763
Agreed. I think Ormsby had a solid season. He just struggled to break down in open space when he had qb in sight. Luke lacked explosion. Never stopped working though.

We need to find a pass rusher. Badly.
Saw that, too. Soft ending for Luke after a lot of early promise.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,364
Reaction Score
68,239
Rather than say he's "half full" I think whaler11 is closer to "half full of it".☺️

You are one of the 5 most nonsensical posters here. You should probably settle down.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,364
Reaction Score
68,239
Ormsby and Zola had no chance last season.

A bit undersized playing against offenses torching their secondary with no depth to give them a blow.

They had to work just to stay onsides against high paced offenses taking 20 at a time.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
21,125
Reaction Score
53,299
You are one of the 5 most nonsensical posters here. You should probably settle down.
oh someone get shizzle so we can do a poll. I like this idea
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
21,125
Reaction Score
53,299
On the football board, it’s pretty easy to name the other 4.
I've got two front runners and i'll throw in the guy who shills his own product here for #3. not sure about a definitive four
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,793
Reaction Score
4,904
Garland's gone, right?

Excellent point. Here are the young dudes. (Cincinnati Two Deep). I like our returning LBs and there are big numbers (beyond this two deep) at DB. Foley and Luke were very good college players. That is where we need to step up. But in our defense scheme, DL is the least critical position group.

DEFENSIVE BACK
41
Marshe Terry, RSo., 6-4, 212
32
Aaron Garland, RSo., 5-11, 193
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
705
Reaction Score
2,695
This team could be considerably worse off defensively.

As far as the recruiting class, where was it ranked in the conference? There were 3 defensive players we were involved with that really intrigued. Lorenz Metz, Landon Woodson, and Jalen Rayam. We went 0 for 3, with two signing with conference foes.

I'm also concerned with the manner in which Lashlee left and the whole Corey Edsall thing. To go to the mattresses against the state for newbie assistant, let the kid go coach elsewhere for a few years. Yes, it's stupid and petty on the state's end as well but they didn't target Edsall with this, it was always in place.

The clock is ticking. Personally I look at this year as the last where we could afford to keep spinning our wheels. 2019 They gotta start getting it done on the field.

"Considerably worse?" Jesus. If that happens it might actually have entertainment value and attendance could go up. But I think we will be a more aggressive, better tackling defense and therefore better overall in terms of yardage and points allowed. My view is based largely if not entirely on wishful thinking.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
21,048
Reaction Score
47,646
"Considerably worse?" Jesus. If that happens it might actually have entertainment value and attendance could go up. But I think we will be a more aggressive, better tackling defense and therefore better overall in terms of yardage and points allowed. My view is based largely if not entirely on wishful thinking.
It's hard to fathom, and I agree with you and Pal, familiarity should help. But to my untrained eye there was such a drop off from our 1st to our 2nd dlines it is scary. Same with the LBs, though not quite as pronounced...but you get the picture.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,342
Reaction Score
8,787
The DL and LB corps will be considerably weaker as a group than last year. And the DB's ... yes the DB's .... The DB's will be either experienced but too slow, or quite a bit faster but very inexperienced. Conclusions about the effectiveness of the defense this coming season are left to the reader.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,831
Reaction Score
10,379
Our defense can improve quite a bit if the secondary takes better angles and shows an interest in tackling. We gave up chunk plays often because a defender didn’t wrap up.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,831
Reaction Score
10,379
And I’ll say again we desperately need to find pass rushers. Don’t care if the are 199 pounds or 299 pounds. We had none last year.

Darrian Beavers was someone who popped out to me at times. He also showed his inexperience too. But when he blitzed I saw a very fast first step.
 

Redding Husky

UConn & SMU alum
Joined
Mar 12, 2015
Messages
2,196
Reaction Score
5,790
This will be a season of patience. There will be improvement that will not necessarily translate into more wins.
I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many times have we heard that we need to be patient in the last 20 years? Probably 15 or 16 of those years.

I agree with your post. I'm just a little weary of being patient.
 

Online statistics

Members online
155
Guests online
1,509
Total visitors
1,664

Forum statistics

Threads
159,623
Messages
4,198,020
Members
10,065
Latest member
Rjja


.
Top Bottom