Centerstream
Looking forward to this season
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2017
- Messages
- 8,522
- Reaction Score
- 33,254
The 2 or 3 ND fanatics constantly trying to take over this forum with their drival.Who cares?
The 2 or 3 ND fanatics constantly trying to take over this forum with their drival.Who cares?
Biggest movers since Feb. 11:
Up: Notre Dame (+3), Miami (+3)
Down: Marquette (from #9 to out)
Biggest movers since Feb. 11:
Up: Notre Dame (+3), Miami (+3)
Down: Marquette (from #9 to out)
Biggest surprise for me was Iowa jumping to a #2 seed.
Actually UConn moved up from 5 to 4 for the Committee's top 16.What did UCONN do wrong for the committee to drop them to #4 since last week? They were forecast to play the #7 seed & now they have #5 Miss State in their bracket.
Still a fair number of non believers in Oregon--not sure why that is? Not sure if that means non-believer(s) in the PAC-12? In any case, I still see ASU & UCLA as extremely difficult teams to play for any #1 or #2 seed. I wouldn't want either of those teams in my bracket.You can go ahead and draw in Baylor, which is going to get beat by the first team that has some athletic ability and plays intelligently. It's their kryptonite and that kryptonite doesn't exist in the Big 12. You can draw in UConn. The conference giveth and the taketh away. Otherwise UConn would be the #1 overall seed. Lots still to be decided in the ACC (personally I don't think ND will be using those frequent flyer miles) SEC and Pac 12. I'm not a big believer in Oregon either. None of the current #1 seeds should fear meeting them in a 1 vs 2 matchup. Unless the game is moved from Portland to Eugene.
I still don't understand this stuff.
UConn has 2 losses to 2 other #1 seeds. The Golden Domers have 3 losses, 1 against UConn and a BAD loss against UNCheats.
Is it only because they are in the ACC and we are in the AAC? Will the #1 Seeds change if Louisville or the GDers don't make it to the ACC Championship game?
Well, they were a #1 seed last week in the reveal, so they had to be in the top 4. Or am I confused as usual?Actually UConn moved up from 5 to 4 for Committee's top 16.
Notre Dame has a huge edge over UConn in terms of RPI top 25 and top 50 wins. Quality wins earn you extra leeway on a (relatively) "bad" loss.I still don't understand this stuff.
UConn has 2 losses to 2 other #1 seeds. The Golden Domers have 3 losses, 1 against UConn and a BAD loss against UNCheats.
Is it only because they are in the ACC and we are in the AAC? Will the #1 Seeds change if Louisville or the GDers don't make it to the ACC Championship game?
Based on their graphic, they moved from a #2 seed to a #1 seed in this reveal.Well, they were a #1 seed last week in the reveal, so they had to be in the top 4. Or am I confused as usual?
Actually I disagreed with what @Fightin Choke said. So to say what I was saying is drival is quite funny.The 2 or 3 ND fanatics constantly trying to take over this forum with their drival.
No, they don't care per se about setting up a rematch. That is not a factor.They're clearly placing more value on the quality wins vs the losses. Also, I think they really want to set up the possible UConn-Miss St rematch if it makes sense.
Personally I think head to head should be a bigger factor...but then how would that work out for Louisville and their loss to ND, so nevermind...Notre Dame has a huge edge over UConn in terms of RPI top 25 and top 50 wins. Quality wins earn you extra leeway on a (relatively) "bad" loss.
But putting ND #3 ahead of UConn didn't affect the bracket one bit. UConn is still in Albany and is still paired with #6 Mississippi St.
No, they don't care per se about setting up a rematch. That is not a factor.
Did I specifically call you out? I think not.Actually I disagreed with what @Fightin Choke said. So to say what I was saying is drival is quite funny.
Thanks! Charlie Creme had them as a #1 Albany seed, AP has them at a #2 ranking, & the selection committee moved them from #5 to #4. They are all over the place!!Based on their graphic, they moved from a #2 seed to a #1 seed in this reveal.
Well, you can believe it if you want, despite the fact that there is no evidence of this.I disagree. I believe they absolutely consider such things, as long as it falls within reasonable seeding guidelines. They want compelling matchups.