The Sanogo issue | Page 5 | The Boneyard

The Sanogo issue

Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
14,598
Reaction Score
30,545
Didn’t read this thread. Doubt I need to.

We simply missed shots, people. Jackson and his trigger pulls didn’t help, but there were otherwise good looks all night. It happens.

We got in to a 16 point deficit and lost by 2. The ball didn’t bounce our way last night. Creighton isn’t some bum team, they’re well-coached, they were at home with a raucous crowd and needed this win. You can’t bend yourself out of shape over this kind of loss.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
1,521
Reaction Score
4,696
Our offensive deficiencies can be summed up.....................we do not have a point guard, and it is NOT Cole's fault. He has been tasked with playing out of position (without complaint, as he is a team player and class kid). He would be a shooting guard on any other team with a true point. This is a recruiting issue.................period.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
1,311
Reaction Score
4,706
He has good and bad games as expected.

Not going zone when he was getting manhandled on defense was disappointing by our coaching staff.

On to the next one.
This. Should’ve changed things up when Kalkbrenner was going off. Huskies did a great job coming back from the deficit, could’ve/should’ve won.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2012
Messages
1,080
Reaction Score
1,636
we just don't have enough shooters that can take the pressure off Sanogo. Cole is pretty much it and they kept him covered pretty well when it counted. Jackson won't take a shot and Gaff is spotty at best. Martin should have been targeted more, but Sanogo tried to do it all himself.
they need some consistent shooters to make this work better. 0-5 against Creighton is annoying especially when they had several opportunities to at least get ahead when it was 52-52. Several shots were missed in that sequence and Creighton went back and scored right away. Just a very frustrating game to watch.
 
Joined
Jan 18, 2021
Messages
6
Reaction Score
15
I just don’t think you can have Jackson, whaley, and sanogo in late in games where you need to score. Sanogo struggles with the traffic and they were daring whaley and Jackson to make shots. I was begging for polley to come in for one of them.
Jackson cost 8 points in less then 30 sec, turnover 2 we don’t score, they score 2, stupid a shot next time down, they score again ( 8 points in 30 sec), he is a liability and we are not talking about his 1940 “set shot”. Almost think Akok could be better choice!
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,615
Reaction Score
25,597
Creighton/Mac kept going to Kalkbrenner until/if UConn stopped the action. Never happened.They didn't even need the three ball last night because of the success they were having.. Adama/staff need to watch some film.. Gonna see it again.

Looked to me like AS was caught watching the ball too much and was a step slow on recovering to stop his guy.

Give the guys credit for coming back and keeping the game close.
Yup, and it's tough to criticize a guy with 14 rebounds and 11 points, because sometimes he gets 15 and 20. But he can't lose track like that.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
49,881
Reaction Score
174,190
Guys, we didn't lose because of shooting and outside shooting isn't our problem as team, we're fine there...we stink at finishing around the rim.

We lost because we got blown out the first 16 minutes of the game and then when we got it close and had chances to go up we let Kalkbrenner have a field day at the rim because of constantly hard hedging with Sanogo.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,951
Reaction Score
74,014
Our offensive deficiencies can be summed up.....................we do not have a point guard, and it is NOT Cole's fault. He has been tasked with playing out of position (without complaint, as he is a team player and class kid). He would be a shooting guard on any other team with a true point. This is a recruiting issue.................period.

Just to be clear, you are saying that Cole is the cause of this team's offensive deficiencies?
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
4,906
Reaction Score
22,342
Yup, and it's tough to criticize a guy with 14 rebounds and 11 points, because sometimes he gets 15 and 20. But he can't lose track like that.
Love his effort and his trajectory.. The reality is he's still relatively new to the game.. Playing since age 15.. So his BB IQ is still evolving and he's a quick study.. But... The Hawkins pick should have been called out by Kalkbrenner's defender-Adama- Didn't happen.. BB 101

Live and learn..
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,154
Reaction Score
24,973
We want him on the floor. When he gets in foul trouble or is missing shots we get in trouble. Against certain (bad) teams we can make hay with him on the bench. If teams can deny him though double teams we need to make them pay in other areas, i.e. Cole taking over in the second half.

Creighton went 34-30 for 64. We went 24-38 for 62. Is not difficult to see we lost the game in the first half and blew a chance to comeback with a series of bonehead decisions. Exactly what didn't happen against Villanova. Play 40 minutes of solid, smart ball, take the W, repeat. 30 minutes won't do it going forward.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,561
Reaction Score
5,078
Sure, Sanogo didn’t get back quick enough after the hedge, which led to multiple dunks. But Creighton/McDermott eliminated any rotational help by extending on the perimeter and clearing the lane, drawing all other UConn defenders away from the hoop. After Kalkbrenner got two or three dunks that way a defensive change was needed: either go zone or eliminate the Sanogo hedge. No change was made and Kalkbrenner go 20 points in the 2nd half as a result. A big-to-big double wasn’t available due to Creighton’s spacing. Tip of the hat to McDermott. Get ‘em next time Huskies. The silver lining - Danny and the team now know how they may be attacked come tournament time and they have time to prepare.
They have had time to prepare, but nothing seems to change.
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,151
Reaction Score
22,013
At least we know Sanogo is coming back. Unless he pulls a DHam

Not trying to be negative here, just saying he needs little work. And that's not a bad thing
 

ClifSpliffy

surf's up
Joined
Nov 9, 2018
Messages
9,506
Reaction Score
14,289
At least we know Sanogo is coming back. Unless he pulls a DHam

Not trying to be negative here, just saying he needs little work. And that's not a bad thing
'At least we know Sanogo is coming back. '
do we? im not so sure yet cuz of the possibility that, with the big stage looming up ahead, he could respond with driven performances that catch the eye of hoops nation, including nba gm types. will it happen? idk, but the real possibility exists. i think he luv's the big stage for the practical reason of his chance to make bank by just playing a game. he's new at this, but has figgered out that he has the power to make it rain benjy's on his head with stellar performances. timing is everything.
that tate guy passed go and collected cash by just making one shot.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
49,881
Reaction Score
174,190
RJ is a definitely a point guard. One of the best in the BE. Would you also say Kemba played out of position?
It's just an insane take and he's not the only one on the board who has said it. Cole is having just as good a season as Gillespie and averages more assists and has a better assist to turnover ratio than him. I doubt any Nova fans are saying Gillespie isn't a point guard.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2011
Messages
294
Reaction Score
2,567
I don’t know what Hurley can do here. He’s definitely out most talented player and when he’s on he’s one of the best players in the big East.

These past couple of games show just how much he can hurt the team though. This team plays SO well when he’s out the game. Our offense gets everyone involved, Whaley gets the do his amazing hedges and can be the same monster on the board. Guys have way more spacing and move the ball better.

With him there’s not as much spacing, we force feed him and he struggles to move the ball and find open guys. He’s not as good of a hedger as Whaley that we saw today. To the point he can single handedly sink us.

It’s almost to a point where I have half a mind to say he should come off the bench as a spark plug if he can’t make his teammates better and only look for his own shot. We just look so much better with Whaley at the 5.

Everyone else on the team does seem to be peaking at the right time. It’s up to Hurley to figure out these lineups in March. We may have to learn to rely less on Sanogo which this team has shown it’s completely capable of doing.
Bump
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
5,253
Reaction Score
17,057
Did great tonight but I still stand by what I said. He got a lot of easy baskets and good position to go up quick once her got the ball. Better teams will make him work harder for it though.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2017
Messages
937
Reaction Score
2,848
Jackson cost 8 points in less then 30 sec, turnover 2 we don’t score, they score 2, stupid a shot next time down, they score again ( 8 points in 30 sec), he is a liability and we are not talking about his 1940 “set shot”. Almost think Akok could be better choice!
He had some tremendous assists. He also gets us running because he speeds up our tempo.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,615
Reaction Score
25,597
He had some tremendous assists. He also gets us running because he speeds up our tempo.
They both have assets and liabilities but those 2 players are not interchangeable.
 

Online statistics

Members online
421
Guests online
2,299
Total visitors
2,720

Forum statistics

Threads
158,813
Messages
4,169,450
Members
10,039
Latest member
Jamie Taco


.
Top Bottom