good points but isn't it fair to say that Texas and Baylor are geographically blessed, at least for the time being? I haven't done the research but I think it's fair to say that there's been more basketball talent coming out of Texas in the past few years then any other area of the country and by a wide margin....and it seems that in WBB the players have a greater desire to stay close to home, thus you folks have been in an ideal position to clean up in the recruiting game...now in looking at the next few classes, it seems that Texas is not going to be quite as productive, so let's see if Mulkey and Aston can keep the recruiting gravy train going with out of state players.....
It's difficult to say what is fair to say when discussing recruits from the state of Texas.
When discussing desire to stay close to home one must take Texas' size into consideration. The land area of Texas is about 262,000 square miles. To compare "close to home with other states, you'd have to match Texas with a combination of many states. A combination of these states would equal Texas in size. RI, DEL, CT, NJ, MA, NH, VT, MD, WV, SC, ME, IN, VA, KY, and part of OH. Add up the number of recruits from these 15 states and see how it compares with Texas. Because of it's size, TX recruits are less likely to experience what life in other states is like since they are so far away. Would this tend to cause recruits to stay in state?
Living in RI, is a different story. Drive 20 minutes or less and you're in another state or in the ocean. But U Texas and Baylor are quit centrally located. That would reduce the travel time for many Texas recruits.
Population must also be considered when comparing Texas with elsewhere. Texas is the second most populous state - about 27.65 million. But it doesn't take many smaller Northeastern states to equal that number. For instance NY coupled with NJ.
In short, it is difficult to make valid conclusions about Texas vs other recruiting areas. Too many variables to consider.