I mean to take a sentence out of the entire post is disingenuous at best. I was obviously playing devils advocate or “worst case scenario”. My point was if this was al Hurley ever accomplishes here and he’s just a stepping stone the hire would still be a success. Don’t be a dunce
Where on earth did that final sentence come from?
It took you three sentences to set it up. And, quite honestly, each of those sentences has
multiple writing errors: in punctuation, word order, and word choice.
If someone questioned something, it, by definition, negates your use of the word "obviously." As such, chastising someone as a "dunce" is much closer to being 'the pot calling the kettle black' than a snappy closeout.
When I slowed things down in order to respectfully decode your writing, I
could make it make sense, but to do so I had to subvocalize as I reread, playback what I'd heard as though it was conversational speech, and then listen to the words for message comprehension.
If someone has to rethink or reprocess what you've written in order to make
best sense of it, have the self-awareness & self-control to back off from calling them a "dunce."
Did you dictate this message, such that punctuation got the short shrift? That possibility would better explain it, but it wouldn't excuse its deficiencies.
Again, I agree with your 'dayenu' argument about Hurley, if one were to take the present as his worst case peak, not that you think it is. To me, your weak writing left some people unclear, and that's not a proper dunking platform.
) or is your reading comprehension below third grade level?
