The List | Page 4 | The Boneyard

The List

Status
Not open for further replies.
UconnFamily said:
Who cares who you like I'm not here to make friends especially with one who makes no sense most of the time. No one said YOU said we were garbage but your excuse for us not winning the games we should have won was because UConn had 65 players, but yet SMU had a full roster and went 1-11.
Expand ...
I'm not here to make friends either, but I really don't care for your opinion nor do I care if you accept mine. Then tell me what the problem is/was. There's a reason they only won 2 games. and 3 the season before. You called the team garbage not me. They were depleted significantly. Many true freshmen were forced into playing last season. How can Uconn expect to win playing so many freshmen with so many other changes? Idk who they play.
 
UConnDan97 said:
The "awesome sauce" was adlib. I shouldn't have put that in quotes. My bad.

Getting back to the discussion: Out of the following teams, please tell me the ones that you think had more talent than we had on their rosters: USF, Temple, Army, SMU, Tulane. If you even say more than two of them, I'll know that you're lying. If you don't say more than two of them, then we agree and you are just fighting me for no reason...
Expand ...
Talent is debatable. Wins are what was. Aside from SMU, all had more wins and beat Uconn. That's it and thats all folks.
 
BNich said:
Talent is debatable. Wins are what was. Aside from SMU, all had more wins and beat Uconn. That's it and thats all folks.
Expand ...

No, that's not all folks. You refused to answer my question. The entire dispute has been about talent on the roster. So I want you to tell me which of those 5 teams had more talent on the roster than we had.

Let me put it another way: If the head coach felt that 2 wins was all that he could squeeze out of this talent, then why on earth would he replace his OC after 1 year??? Think about that for more than a second, please...
 
BNich said:
I'm not here to make friends either, but I really don't care for your opinion nor do I care if you accept mine. Then tell me what the problem is/was. There's a reason they only won 2 games. and 3 the season before. You called the team garbage not me. They were depleted significantly. Many true freshmen were forced into playing last season. How can Uconn expect to win playing so many freshmen with so many other changes? Idk who they play.
Expand ...

If you don't care for my opinion then why ask me for my opinion? And yes I did say we were garbage because unfortunately we was.
 
UConnDan97 said:
No, that's not all folks. You refused to answer my question. The entire dispute has been about talent on the roster. So I want you to tell me which of those 5 teams had more talent on the roster than we had.

Let me put it another way: If the head coach felt that 2 wins was all that he could squeeze out of this talent, then why on earth would he replace his OC after 1 year??? Think about that for more than a second, please...
Expand ...
They all clearly had more talent as they all beat Uconn.
 
BNich said:
They all clearly had more talent as they all beat Uconn.
Expand ...

I watched Appalachian State beat Michigan on tv once. They must have had a crapload more talent! It's also good to know from you that UConn had more talent than UCF, but not more than 1-11 SMU. Very insightful.

It's stuff like this that makes me truly wonder if you believe the stuff you are typing...
 
.-.
UConnDan97 said:
I watched Appalachian State beat Michigan on tv once. They must have had a crapload more talent! It's also good to know from you that UConn had more talent than UCF, but not more than 1-11 SMU. Very insightful.

It's stuff like this that makes me truly wonder if you believe the stuff you are typing...
Expand ...
I don't care if you do. Theres a reason people play the lottery. Chance. Hope. I'm done here.
 
Pudge said:
We have no idea how Diaco did. Number 2 - the Stars are not the same; I just pointed out a huge variance. Offers? This ain't fact.
Expand ...

Sure, we don't know how Diaco did this year. This could end up being a great class.

All we have to go on right now is stars and offers.

Luckily for us, we have historical data of recruiting classes and the correlation with how they performed on the field.

You can sit here and rant about a 4 year stretch with Edsall (our peak) that culminated in a 16-12 Big East record and how the recruiting sites missed Easley and Donald Thomas. You could point to that and say recruiting sites and offers and wrong.

Why you choose to ignore the recruiting data and on field success from every single FBS program in aggregate is nonsensical.
 
Talk to those who don't rely on subscriptions to make it for recruiting info. ESPN, and a couple of others are not connected to any school and they are more honest when it comes to mid rated players. Now the top tier players in high school will be ranked high by all, but when you get down to the three star and two star recruits it is a crap shoot. Just look at what FHCRE did with those no stars players.
This is the first real class for coach Diaco as last year was a 45 day push to keep players and bring in others. He gets this upcoming season and next. If he fails by then UCONN will be looking for another coach and probably another AD.
 
Look him up: I was a TA for Richard Roll at UCLA. I can do Regression Analysis. The other TA was Rick Passov - CFO at Pfizer (I underachieved).

You have no Statistical significance. Nada. Don't Know what the hell you are spouting.

This Stars & Offers language is shooting out your butt. There's just nothing to it. I get your point; but you are way out there in your hyperbole. And as for Diaco ... We have no clue. Offers Stars? Just not significant. Talk about in 5 years.

As for the my post ... I'm not taking this serious. You don't care about this board. Your "fandom" only catches when we suck.
 
.-.
As if all of your moving targets and inane protests weren't enough...

Now CHB 'doesn't care about this board' and his 'fandom only
catches when we suck'....

Candidly, your current merry band of allies (bnich, CCarl) post as though they have suffered recent TBI. Anyone who 'cares about this board' and the quality of discussion would be making their tired accusations towards them.

In this very thread Bnich is either a boring troll or is not bright enough to have a conversation with these 'mature adults' you so miss. Honestly, I can't tell if CCarl and BNich are just the most tedious trolls I've ever seen or if they really are so dim as to believe everything they post.
 
Pudge said:
Look him up: I was a TA for Richard Roll at UCLA. I can do Regression Analysis. The other TA was Rick Passov - CFO at Pfizer (I underachieved).

You have no Statistical significance. Nada. Don't Know what the hell you are spouting.

This Stars & Offers language is shooting out your butt. There's just nothing to it. I get your point; but you are way out there in your hyperbole. And as for Diaco ... We have no clue. Offers Stars? Just not significant. Talk about in 5 years.

As for the my post ... I'm not taking this serious. You don't care about this board. Your "fandom" only catches when we suck.
Expand ...

Did you ever get "rick rolled"?
 
Smarties were staring at a Regression Analysis & didn't know.

I suggest we just sail on ...
 
Pudge said:
Smarties were staring at a Regression Analysis & didn't know.

I suggest we just sail on ...
Expand ...

Yes, Pudge it's everyone else who can't recognize the high correlation in the graph.

I'd bore you with my resume but it's more entertaining to watch you flail like a drowning man grabbing onto any strawman that floats by all while proclaiming your genius.
 
"There was a significant correlation (r=0.77) between recruiting and on-field rankings"

I guess the author doesn't understand regression analysis either.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,366
Messages
4,568,069
Members
10,471
Latest member
EO2004


Top Bottom