And how do you judge it's the best they can do? Was the St. Joe's game the best they could do, if not how did you determine that? How about Villanova, was that the best they could do? Is it ok for Josh to be a 50% foul shooter because that is the best he can do, or how about practice your damn foul shots so you don't cost the team a bunch of games. Adams seems to be practicing all the time (per his comments), is Josh next to him practicing foul shots and post moves? Why was Sid out of the line up for a while, seems like Hurley had an issue with his practice "effort", was that ok?
Josh played terrible at the beginning of the 2nd half and saying so didn't make it so, playing bad made it so. Should Hurley point that out to Josh or would that also be inappropriate?
You make a judgement that associates calling out bad play with not enjoying the games, wrong, having no ability to see and comment on the bad makes the good play meaningless as in either case it's "the best they can do".