The expanded College Football Playoff off to a rough start | Page 5 | The Boneyard

The expanded College Football Playoff off to a rough start

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,226
Reaction Score
25,261
Depends on how you define "work".

It's often been stated that the sole purpose of the CFP is to help ensure the "best" team succeeds and wins the crown. It's not to guarantee entertaining contests.

If one goes by that definition, then this year's CFP is the best way to do that that's been devised thus far. Although I still think they could've accomplished the same with just eight teams.

This is the paradox of CFB. How do you know the best teams until they play?

Winning a major conference championship is an actual thing. It's objective. So Boise and ASU get byes, big whoop. They have to still beat 3 too teams to win the title. If they were #5 and #6 we'd still have the same matchups. If they were #7 & #8, we'd still have similar matchups. It doesn't really matter.

All you'd he doing is saying the A team like Tennessee or SMU could beat them in the first round. While that's true, it doesn't affect the ultimate outcome
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,799
Reaction Score
35,029
Depends on how you define "work".

It's often been stated that the sole purpose of the CFP is to help ensure the "best" team succeeds and wins the crown. It's not to guarantee entertaining contests.

If one goes by that definition, then this year's CFP is the best way to do that that's been devised thus far. Although I still think they could've accomplished the same with just eight teams.

Did you really just post that college football is not about entertaining its viewers? You are aware that the players are not curing disease or inventing a new AI application, they are playing football. The reason there are billions of dollars to split among them is because people are entertained. If it stops being entertaining, a lot of people in the college football industry are going to make a lot less money.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,799
Reaction Score
35,029
What is your solution?


If that is tl;dr, the answer is there is no answer. I think the sport is in deep trouble and is going to fail eventually.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
7,530
Reaction Score
25,204

If that is tl;dr, the answer is there is no answer. I think the sport is in deep trouble and is going to fail eventually.

Personally I like the current "no rules" system. The old system was extremely corrupt and tilted toward certain power players, now the landscape has been flattened.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,382
Reaction Score
48,654

If that is tl;dr, the answer is there is no answer. I think the sport is in deep trouble and is going to fail eventually.
That was far from being too long to read but there are flaws in your logic:
  • Congressional interference isn't feasible. Beyond the point that our elected officials should have more important things to spend their time on, they haven't been effective in implimenting anything for longer than most can remember.
  • Your contention of what "most fans" would be "interested in" would require fan investment throughout FBS football to be far more balanced than it currently is. The cartel of schools who are (and have been) receiving most of the spots that allow a chance to play for the title exceed home attendance numbers by mid-September that exceeds what more than half of FBS can claim for an entire season. brand names (Southern Cal, Notre Dame, etc.) land larger television audiences in down seasons than most non-P2 schools could ever land.
Your complaint currently is that most of these games are blowouts. I've been following this sport since Jim Plunkett and Archie Manning were playing for Stanford and Ole Miss respectively and in those five and a half decades there have been very few championships that were won with games like Miami-Nebraska in the 1/01/1984 Orange Bowl.

There are going t o be blowouts, it's part of the nature of sports. Hell, in the past two men's NCAA tournaments the eventual champion blew out every team they faced. Should congress have stepped in to make that more fair?
 

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
21,152
Reaction Score
46,044
Did you really just post that college football is not about entertaining its viewers? You are aware that the players are not curing disease or inventing a new AI application, they are playing football. The reason there are billions of dollars to split among them is because people are entertained. If it stops being entertaining, a lot of people in the college football industry are going to make a lot less money.
You highly underestimate the appetite for crappy football of the general public.

If you disagree, please elaborate on the ratings success of Thursday Night Football compared to other televised/streamed entertainment in the same time period. TNF is well-known
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2017
Messages
1,561
Reaction Score
10,311
Another lackluster game right now. Arizona St just being absolutely dominated. I wish we just went back to a 4 team CFP; felt like the games were usually more competitive/interesting overall.

Edit: I come on here to complain and then suddenly Arizona St decides to make things interesting.
 
Joined
Nov 30, 2013
Messages
4,415
Reaction Score
14,825
Another lackluster game right now. Arizona St just being absolutely dominated. I wish we just went back to a 4 team CFP; felt like the games were usually more competitive/interesting overall.

Edit: I come on here to complain and then suddenly Arizona St decides to make things interesting.
Two blatant PI on Texas and ASU can tie
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,382
Reaction Score
48,654
Another lackluster game right now. Arizona St just being absolutely dominated. I wish we just went back to a 4 team CFP; felt like the games were usually more competitive/interesting overall.

Edit: I come on here to complain and then suddenly Arizona St decides to make things interesting.
That was one hell of a post. It turned the game completely around.
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2017
Messages
1,561
Reaction Score
10,311
Skattebo with that crazy TD pass was easily one of the best plays of the CFP so far.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,799
Reaction Score
35,029
That was far from being too long to read but there are flaws in your logic:
  • Congressional interference isn't feasible. Beyond the point that our elected officials should have more important things to spend their time on, they haven't been effective in implimenting anything for longer than most can remember.
  • Your contention of what "most fans" would be "interested in" would require fan investment throughout FBS football to be far more balanced than it currently is. The cartel of schools who are (and have been) receiving most of the spots that allow a chance to play for the title exceed home attendance numbers by mid-September that exceeds what more than half of FBS can claim for an entire season. brand names (Southern Cal, Notre Dame, etc.) land larger television audiences in down seasons than most non-P2 schools could ever land.
Your complaint currently is that most of these games are blowouts. I've been following this sport since Jim Plunkett and Archie Manning were playing for Stanford and Ole Miss respectively and in those five and a half decades there have been very few championships that were won with games like Miami-Nebraska in the 1/01/1984 Orange Bowl.

There are going t o be blowouts, it's part of the nature of sports. Hell, in the past two men's NCAA tournaments the eventual champion blew out every team they faced. Should congress have stepped in to make that more fair?

All the major sports leagues operate under a legal umbrella protecting them from antitrust claims. College sports needs something similar.

I do not have a rebuttal for the argument by you and @storrsroars that college football can have an unwatchably terrible product and its current fan base will stay with it and even grow. You might be right, and we will probably find out soon.
 

Online statistics

Members online
69
Guests online
5,561
Total visitors
5,630

Forum statistics

Threads
160,630
Messages
4,236,739
Members
10,092
Latest member
wrocki01


.
Top Bottom