- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 360
- Reaction Score
- 298
You cannot allow an act contrary to established rules to continue if there is even a miniscule chance that damage can be done by continuing the act. I am a retired attorney who, years ago, defended a number of people who "just let the kid throw the ball around." It would be nice if we all carried $1,000,000 potential stupidity insurance and let the stadium off the hook. Find a way that the first named defendant in a tort claim wouldn't be the deep pockets stadium and I'll agree with you that we have too many rules and regulations.