Lol at what point in the game did you conclude this? I imagine it was before Nova ended the game with like 30 offensive reboundsNova looks soft
I just heard Bilas mention Girard averaged 40 ppg in high school. I don’t know how competitive the NYSPHSAA , where his alma mater Glens Falls HS resides, is, but he did average 39 ppg over 4 years...50 ppg his junior year. How rare is that? I honestly don’t know.
Don't do that.If we don’t blow Nova outta the gym this year….
* Canadian points, thoughIn before someone mentions Denham Brown once scored 111 points in a Canadian high school basketball game...
2011 National Player of the Year...even better than Ben Hansbrough... have you ever heard of Jimmer Fredette?
I just heard Bilas mention Girard averaged 40 ppg in high school. I don’t know how competitive the NYSPHSAA , where his alma mater Glens Falls HS resides, is, but he did average 39 ppg over 4 years...50 ppg his junior year. How rare is that? I honestly don’t know.
Not going to go as far as calling them soft, but when you miss 37 3-pointers and 52 shots, 18 offensive rebounds doesn’t seem hugely impressive.Lol at what point in the game did you conclude this? I imagine it was before Nova ended the game with like 30 offensive rebounds
That's a 34.6% OR% which is pretty good. That would put them at #40 in the country this year. It also looks like they had 27 offensive rebounds looking at the box score (9 team rebounds I'm guessing) so that's 51.9%Not going to go as far as calling them soft, but when you miss 37 3-pointers and 52 shots, 18 offensive rebounds doesn’t seem hugely impressive.
Maybe the box score I was looking at was wrong. Point being, those threes led to a lot of very long rebounds that were basically impossible for cuse to get. Not saying it’s not good, but they weren’t bullying cuse for boards like the stats make it look initially.That's a 34.6% OR% which is pretty good. That would put them at #40 in the country this year. It also looks like they had 27 offensive rebounds looking at the box score (9 team rebounds I'm guessing) so that's 51.9%
Lol at what point in the game did you conclude this? I imagine it was before Nova ended the game with like 30 offensive rebounds
There are some wordier explanations above.
My less wordy explanation - it’s a crap league.
Syracuse is 5-4, with terrible losses. They will not be in the tournament. And we'd beat them comfortably. It took an abnormal abysmal shooting half for Nova to only beat them by 14. They aren't goodMy take on last night’s game was that both teams would be tough opponents. Nova took the most 3’s they ever took and had a bad shooting night. They are not big but pass incredibly well , limit turnovers.
The Cuse has Edwards who disrupts and blocks shots plus they have guys who can make shots and as much as we hate Boeheim and his boys they’re good players.
Both will be in the tournament and both games would be uncomfortable for us with our turnovers.
But they won on grit and passion. If UConn threw up those bricks do they beat Cuse? I’m guessing no but who knows. Not many teams in college basketball win with shooting percentages like thatNot going to go as far as calling them soft, but when you miss 37 3-pointers and 52 shots, 18 offensive rebounds doesn’t seem hugely impressive.