CL82
NCAA Woman's Basketball National Champions
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 63,664
- Reaction Score
- 249,717
Was Diaco on Sirius today without the trophy? No.
whaler11 said:Really? What did Willie Taggert do to get on?
I'll try responding to you as for the most part you can be reasonable.As opposed to SMU who wasn't very good didn't win any football games went on the road in the cold rain for a coaching staff that was looking for jobs elsewhere yet came back to win...
I'll try responding to you as for the most part you can be reasonable.
What is your opinion of the job Justin Fuente is doing at Memphis (keep in mind that they had a handful of winning seasons over the 25 prior to his arrival, most of those coming with DeAngelo Williams as their RB)? After answering that question tell me what happened on the last game of his second season as Memphis' head coach.
I still vividly remember Bill Parcells' first season as head coach of the NY Giants. Most pundits and many experts openly stated that it looked as if the team quit on him down the stretch that season. Many (myself included) wanted him gone and if the urban legend is true, if Howard Schnellenberger hadn't been given a ridiculous offer from the USFL (for a Miami franchise that never got off the ground), his buddy George Young would have hired him to replace Parcells in early 1984.
The thing is we see very little of what goes on with a sports team and more often than not it is not black and white as to whether a team is fully behind its head coach or is just going through the motions or running out the string.
The reality (which i do believe you also pointed out) is that Diaco will either succeed or fail and that is exactly what he will be judged on. Thinking that there is sufficient evidence at this point to claim that he has succeeded or failed is assinine.
I haven't declared him a failure but it certainly would give me a lot more confidence if they would start landing some players...
Next year UConn will probably get about 3 wins, give or take, and you'll be able to tell everybody how smart you are that you predicted he'd suck again. However, Diaco will not get fired at the end of the year, and will be given a chance to get UConn bowl eligible 2016. If he does that you'll still be able to tell everybody how smart you are because Diaco got 6 or 7 wins but a real coach would have got 9. The next year UConn will be playing in a mid-level bowl game against a decent opponent, and they'll lose because somewhere in the game Diaco makes a questionable call on 4th down or something, and you will again be able to crow about how you were right about him and everybody else was wrong. And perhaps (one can hope) some years later he'll have UConn playing for a conference championship and a major bowl appearance, and during the press conference before the game he'll give awkward praise to the opposing coach and quote some obscure philosopher and one more time you'll be proven right because gosh it's so embarrassing to the university to have the football coach who's such a weirdo. Or mabye I'm way off and Warde decides to can him mid-year 3 like he did with PP. The important thing is, you're the smartest guy in the room and we as a football board are lucky to have you grace us with your presence.Kreskin, now there's someone Diaco probably loves. Of course you probably referenced him without knowing one thing about him, oh well. But here's the thing pal, talking in December is what you did at the end of last year when you finally woke up (actually you still haven't completely opened your eyes). Some of us had our eyes wide open and our brains working last summer and saw the disaster coming, we didn't need to wait until the season was over before proclaiming we were right. We actually were right, you were wrong.
But I'll play your little small minded game, and see what the whackadoodle does over summer camp and then make my prediction before the season starts. It probably won't be much different than if I picked the games right now frankly, but I have hope he will shock me and pull a 180. If I was a betting man I'd say he goes down with the ship and we are rid of him after two years just like the last fraud off the Brian Kelly coaching tree was washed out after two awful years at UMass.
My only point is we see a lot
of posts of how the kids believe in him and buy in.
To your point, almost none of us have any idea what's going on inside the program.
So what I saw was a team that rolled over and played dead twice at home. The other thing we see is that schools are starting to fill their 2016 classes (Houston and Tulane have 7-8 verbals for example) and UConn still doesn't have a commit.
So since the evidence that players have bought in seems to be what they post on Twitter - I don't see a lot of compelling evidence that one can claim players have bought in either.
But yes of course plenty of good coaches in all sports have had teams mail it in at the end of the season.
I haven't declared him a failure but it certainly would give me a lot more confidence if they would start landing some players instead of giving us more reasons to question his sanity.
I'd love to shake this feeling that he'll figure it all out at his next head coaching gig. I'd prefer to not be his Cleveland.
We had only a handful of players commit this early over the last ten years. .
More like a civil blitzkrieg!Point6 said:My question is how is this even a rivalry if UCF has never won one of these civil conflict games??
The best take on the Civil Conflict was on Twitter.
One more thing: a coach's status as a success or a failure is determined by winning and losing games. Calling his public persona batsheet insane and lambasting his actions in the media doesn't make him a failure.
We didn't go 2-10 because Diaco is bizarre or a "snake oil salesman". That has nothing to do with taking out G. Davis on 3rd down, pulling CC when we enter the red zone, shutting down the passing game against USF, or calling poorly-timed time outs. This is X's and O's stuff. If you're pissed off by his shtick, you have every right to be. But that doesn't determine his value as a coach, and any rational person knows that.
He got me back a bit with this....perhaps I just prefer arrogance to insanity:
Why do I have to call their athletic department to say that we've got them targeted as our rival, period? What control over that would they have? What do I care what they think? If they don't want to be a part of the trophy, I don't care about that either."