BUHusky
The original. Accept no substitutes.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,454
- Reaction Score
- 4,034
How am I just talking about clay? Did you miss the part about Nadal having 5 majors and a gold medal on non-clay surfaces? Nadal is excellent on "truer" surfaces. Nadal is excellent on all surfaces. Sampras was not. This isn't hard.But you're just talking about clay still. Sampras wasn't as 'complete' as Nadal because he wasn't good on clay, but he was much better on the truer surfaces. Sampras would have killed Nadal on grass, and probably beaten him handily on hardcourt as well. But particularly that stretch in the 90s, he was basically unbeatable at Wimbledon, winning 7 in 8 years.
