- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 94,438
- Reaction Score
- 369,833
That’s my take. It will be hard to beat out JF if he plays like he did those last 3-4 games.Love this. Everybody's got an opinion but you can't fool the guys who are there at every practice.
Remember before last season when there was a vocal ABF (anybody but Fagnano) contingent on the board? I may have been one of them (at least a bit, I don't like to rag on kids). Now, I'd be psyched to have him back, as long as Welliver gets a shot at winning the position.
From what I remember is he's open to a quarterback competition, but once the season starts, he prefers to stick with one guy.That’s my take. It will be hard to beat out JF if he plays like he did those last 3-4 games.
But Welliver needs a shot.
My only concern is Mora can be thick headed on QB Position. It was clear to most people that the switch to Joey should have happened well before it did last year but I think it was an injury to Evers that finally got JF a chance and he ran with it.
Mora too much on this whole “standing behind starting QB” thick and thin but really just needs to put best player on the field each game IMO.
Great post.From what I remember is he's open to a quarterback competition, but once the season starts, he prefers to stick with one guy.
I'm actually curious to see what a fully healthy Evers looks like. He supposedly was a dual threat quarterback, but after the concussions, he seemed reluctant to run, reasonably, and wasn't as good a passing threat as Fagnano.
Welliver is the great unknown. I'm excited to see what a years worth of development has done to his game.
But as I noted in my post, Fagnano was able to move the team successfully at the end of the season. If that's our baseline at quarterback, I'm pretty excited for the season.
I think you can successfully have "two quarterbacks" if it's a part of a specific plan. What's difficult is changing quarterbacks because the number one guy is getting the majority of the reps so he establishes timing with the receivers and the line is used to his cadence, etc. Switching that up impacts everybody. Quarterback is not a plug-and-play position.Live ammo brings out abilities not shown in practice. Speaks to giving a kid an extended live look.
Prevailing school of thought on the Yard and in FB I'm told is if you have 2 QB's you have none. Not sure I believe it, but I am not a FB guy by experience, so I defer to the experts.
I don’t know, I’ve seen other teams alternate and approach this position much differently than we have over the years.I think you can successfully have "two quarterbacks" if it's a part of a specific plan. What's difficult is changing quarterbacks because the number one guy is getting the majority of the reps so he establishes timing with the receivers and the line is used to his cadence, etc. Switching that up impacts everybody. Quarterback is not a plug-and-play position.
That's part of why what Fagnano did last year was so impressive. He lost a lot of reps and yet was able to move the team effectively. And probably why as the season went on, and he got more reps, he looked better and better.
From what I remember is he's open to a quarterback competition, but once the season starts, he prefers to stick with one guy.
I'm actually curious to see what a fully healthy Evers looks like. He supposedly was a dual threat quarterback, but after the concussions, he seemed reluctant to run, reasonably, and wasn't as good a passing threat as Fagnano.
Welliver is the great unknown. I'm excited to see what a years worth of development has done to his game.
But as I noted in my post, Fagnano was able to move the team successfully at the end of the season. If that's our baseline at quarterback, I'm pretty excited for the season.
I don't disagree. I'm just hoping that there is a better version of Nick then we saw last season.My take on Nick was he lacked the speed/quickness to get to the next level when running. His passing was subpar. Those 2 skill levels, or lack of, combined, present the defense with better options to cover our offense. JF may not be able to run, but the teams we played had to respect his passing capabilities. IMO results matter.
My take on Nick was he lacked the speed/quickness to get to the next level when running. His passing was subpar. Those 2 skill levels, or lack of, combined, present the defense with better options to cover our offense. JF may not be able to run, but the teams we played had to respect his passing capabilities. IMO results matter.
If I remember correctly, Evers was healthy to start the season. He was pretty awful at MD. Look, I was a huge Evers supporter for most of last season and totally ate crow on JF. However, I don't see NE developing into what he could be.I'm actually curious to see what a fully healthy Evers looks like. He supposedly was a dual threat quarterback, but after the concussions, he seemed reluctant to run, reasonably, and wasn't as good a passing threat as Fagnano.
All I want to see is an open and fair competition where no one is anointed on anything other than performance based merit. Hard to look at the situation last year and not think that NIL commitment didn't impact who was named starter to begin the year.If I remember correctly, Evers was healthy to start the season. He was pretty awful at MD. Look, I was a huge Evers supporter for most of last season and totally ate crow on JF. However, I don't see NE developing into what he could be.
I do agree with wanting to see what Welliver can offer. I think we are all excited to see that
With running backs we have a dual threat isn't a necessity. If the threats are turnovers and incompletions, well who needs that anyway.A year later, with a new passing game coordinator and a new offensive line, we will need to see who fits the offense the best. Evers needs to be healthy and read the defense better and deliver better short and intermediate balls. Fagnano really improved but doesn't provide the dual threat that they wanted.
In looking back, the outside zone blocking is at full affect when the QB can keep it and run. It helps the Tackles and freezes the LBs. We got bogged down a little in the middle of the year (see Temple and Rice) when that QB threat wasn't there. That is why I think we saw Mora sticking with Evers until he couldn't anymore.
Thought his best game was Wake Forest. I had hoped he could build off that, but next game back to 79 yds passing. You're just not gonna win with no passing threat.It turned out just to be a snapshot but for a good portion of that Duke game, the Devils did not have an answer for Evers. I remember thinking "that's what Mora's plan is". Then he failed to close.