That's A Wrap. Post Spring Game QB Depth? | Page 3 | The Boneyard

That's A Wrap. Post Spring Game QB Depth?

Don't think having a runner 1st and passer 2nd is the way to go. Need an accurate passer who is mobile. Pindell was a runner 1st and passer 2nd and would want a better/more accurate passer, giving up some mobility if need be.
Runner 1st unfortunately is the way college football is has been since Tebow. And with the Oline struggles this team has had for the last decade, we need a mobile QB first. Tyler made the offense move because he was able to extend plays. That isn't a knock on Steve, who was probably the best arm/most accurate arm on the team. It's just he wasn't as mobile so he didn't have the time to utilize his strengths.
 
It's probably more difficult to judge a dual threat QB in non-contact practice, that said it would be great if Steven Krajewski really thrived in this offense and blew away the competition. More than likely both will play early in the season.
Though Krajewski isn’t a dual threat QB like TP or Roberson he definitely isn’t afraid to run the ball, and with defenders keying on his passing ability (if he’s throwing well) he will have opportunities to run for yardage.
 
I respectfully disagree with the notion that the staff wants a quarterback that runs first and passes second. Today's modern college offenses require mobile quarterbacks who can roll out and throw the ball on the run and who can also avoid pass rushes to extend plays. Being the best pure thrower in practice may not mean that you will be the most successful quarterback in game conditions. Every team we played last year had a more mobile quarterback than our first two quarterbacks on our roster. That probably should tell us something. I am reasonably confident, that Charlton will be able to identify the quarterback on our roster that will have the most success in his offense.
 
I respectfully disagree with the notion that the staff wants a quarterback that runs first and passes second. Today's modern college offenses require mobile quarterbacks who can roll out and throw the ball on the run and who can also avoid pass rushes to extend plays. Being the best pure thrower in practice may not mean that you will be the most successful quarterback in game conditions. Every team we played last year had a more mobile quarterback than our first two quarterbacks on our roster. That probably should tell us something. I am reasonably confident, that Charlton will be able to identify the quarterback on our roster that will have the most success in his offense.
We will most likely pick the right QB. And half the posters here will, after one loss, assume the opposite.
 
.-.
I respectfully disagree with the notion that the staff wants a quarterback that runs first and passes second. Today's modern college offenses require mobile quarterbacks who can roll out and throw the ball on the run and who can also avoid pass rushes to extend plays. Being the best pure thrower in practice may not mean that you will be the most successful quarterback in game conditions. Every team we played last year had a more mobile quarterback than our first two quarterbacks on our roster. That probably should tell us something. I am reasonably confident, that Charlton will be able to identify the quarterback on our roster that will have the most success in his offense.
In an interview right after he was hired....Mora said he wanted a duel threat QB. And he preferred a thrower who can run over a runner who can throw. Of course...that can all go out the window based on your roster...but that's his preference.
 
I always want to replace a player who isn't producing. I always will.
Especially at running back, you play whoever is on a hot streak till they get cold feet
 
Runner 1st unfortunately is the way college football is has been since Tebow. And with the Oline struggles this team has had for the last decade, we need a mobile QB first. Tyler made the offense move because he was able to extend plays. That isn't a knock on Steve, who was probably the best arm/most accurate arm on the team. It's just he wasn't as mobile so he didn't have the time to utilize his strengths.
I don’t agree. I think that the better teams have guys who can throw the ball first and can also make plays with their feet, both by design and by necessity. The Buffalo guy is sort of the prototype. They can extend plays and they add the possibility of a run. I think that is the goal. Not sure Tyler P is exactly that type. He extends plays but too often they turn into runs. And he isn’t a good passer. Or wasn’t. We will see What happens come the fall but one thing we know, the starter, whoever it is, will not be as good as the backup according to palatine.
 
.-.
There are so many dynamic receiver athletes in college and the pros. The best offenses try to find ways to get the ball in their hands. You need someone who can sling it to make that happen. Being able to move adds another great dimension as long as there is enough arm skills to deliver the ball. So I think for UConn it will be pass first with the ability to buy time and take off when it's available. That's the skill set of 4 of the 5 QBs on the roster.
 
We will see What happens come the fall but one thing we know, the starter, whoever it is, will not be as good as the backup according to palatine.
It wasn't just pal questioning the previous regime on this front. I wasn't even following the battle that closely and was stunned when I show up at the game and found a starter that could not throw. And we kept trotting him out there. I want a QB that can throw for a change.
 
Take what they give you. My observation last year is that the receivers were mostly covered tight with little separation. The Holy Cross game there was huge running room for the QB that didn’t take advantage of.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,269
Messages
4,560,769
Members
10,452
Latest member
WashingtonH


Top Bottom