We're just plain USC, thank you, the 4 time defending SEC regular season champs and the 3 time defending SEC Tournament champs. If you think your thinly veiled condescension isn't evident, I've got news for you.
There was no condescension intended, thinly or other wise. We've gone over this before. Whether you choose to recognize/accept it or not,
there are two USC's. You and I are on two opposite ends of the country. In South Carolina, "USC" means University of South Carolina. I understand and respect that fact! However, out here in the west coast region, "USC" means
University of Southern California. It has for well over 100 years. I can only speak for what I know in reference to the USC in Southern California. As long as I've been alive (over half a century +) and became aware of the existence of Southern Cal,
It's been referred to as USC. We're not going to argue this point. It's not that serious, at least not to me.
I understand and recognize that South Carolina was founded first in 1801, and Southern Cal in 1879. Yes, South Carolina opened it's doors 78 years before Southern Cal did, but that fact has nothing to do with your assertion, regardless of who was here first.
USC is the acronym that the news and sports media uses. I've seen Southern Cal referenced as "USC" on ESPN, Fox Sports 1 and the NFL Network. Most news media outlets (electronic and print) in this region use "USC" in reference to Southern Cal. To save space in their articles, USC is easier to use than spell out University of Southern California.
We have a lot of people from all over the country that log on to the Boneyard. Everyday, we get new readers (lurkers) that may not know that there are two USC's or when USC is used, which school is being referenced. That is why I used the "USCe" reference that I did, so as not to confuse them (or anyone else). I didn't use it to demean, degrade or disrespect South Carolina. I don't have a beef with Gamecock Nation.
I've also seen other posters use this acronym to describe either of these two institutions they were referencing. If you were to use "USC" in reference to South Carolina, it would not offend me one bit. It's your post, your choice. My brother got his master's degree from Southern Cal in 1980, so you could say that I'm part of the Trojan family in a left handed sort of way. I've been a fan of USC football since Mike Garrett was in their backfield. I've attended at least 50 + games at the coliseum since then. Fight on!
I don't understand why you're offended at my use of it. If that offends you, there's nothing I can do about it. You need to complain to the news outlets that regularly use that acronym when referring to Southern Cal.
I understand and respect your pride in your school, but the fact remains there are two schools in the USA that use and are referenced by that acronym.
I've got news for you too - Here's the kicker. I'll end my response on this note. Google the 3 letters "USC", and see what comes up. Keep in mind that Google is a global search engine. I rest my case. Happy new year.
Addendum - To further support this narrative, I've included a link to newspaper articles from the
1930's that used the acronym "USC" in reference to the University of Southern California, and not South Carolina for your perusal and consideration.
[LINK]