Considering the overall success and prestige of the program, it's amazing how hard they seem to have to fight to get kids away from tier 2(or worse) programs.
I guess I'm the only one who thinks part of the reason this is difficult is that these guys look at our roster and see Adams, Samuel, Calhoun, Cassell Jr., Purvis, and Hamilton all sitting there capable of playing minutes at the same positions they play.We always have something around our necks - for a stretch, it was Calhoun's age. (Something you never hear about K or JB or (insert old coach here)).
It's the conference. Everything, and I mean everything should be rolling this school's way, and we're still scrapping.
I guess I'm the only one who thinks part of the reason this is difficult is that these guys look at our roster and see Adams, Samuel, Calhoun, Cassell Jr., Purvis, and Hamilton all sitting there capable of playing minutes at the same positions they play.
I guess I'm the only one who thinks part of the reason this is difficult is that these guys look at our roster and see Adams, Samuel, Calhoun, Cassell Jr., Purvis, and Hamilton all sitting there capable of playing minutes at the same positions they play.[/QUOTE
Two things. I don't think Samuel, Calhoun or Jr are on the top of any recruits mind. And though you are correct about competition for minutes, I think we should be a program where recruits come anyway like Duke or UK.
If we aren't
You dont think guys look at who is in a program in the classes ahead of them that play minutes at the positions they play?
Samuel, as a freshman, played significant minutes in the biggest college basketball games possible, was not phased one bit, and did really well. You don't the fact he has 3 more years of eligibility has any impact on guard recruits?
I thought Cassell was a RS soph this year. Leaving him with 3 years of eligibility?Shouldn't have any influence on anyone other than the PGs. I tend to think UConn will need at least one top PG next season, because after Boatright leaves, and Cassell will only have a year left, UConn will need one more to share the reins with Samuel while Adams is also in the mix at the 1/2.
But if I'm a 2/3 like Mack, then Samuel will not concern me.
I thought Cassell was a RS soph this year. Leaving him with 3 years of eligibility?
Shouldn't have any influence on anyone other than the PGs. I tend to think UConn will need at least one top PG next season, because after Boatright leaves, and Cassell will only have a year left, UConn will need one more to share the reins with Samuel while Adams is also in the mix at the 1/2.
Cassell has 3 years of eligibility. I don't see point guard being a huge need in the '16 class. Adams in '15 and Waters in '17 will do just fine.
Cassell has 3 years of eligibility. I don't see point guard being a huge need in the '16 class. Adams in '15 and Waters in '17 will do just fine.
Considering the overall success and prestige of the program, it's amazing how hard they seem to have to fight to get kids away from tier 2(or worse) programs.
I should have been more clear. I meant UConn will need to recruit a top PG next season, because at that point, Cassell will only have 1 year left after. (i.e. a kid recruited next year [2016 class] will only play one season with Cassell).
Each recruit is different. For Mack PT is #1 on his list. Conference affiliation could act as a mitigating factor to PT but it will not decrease the competition Mack most likely will encounter his Freshman year at the 2/3. If the cards fall right 2016 would be the time to land a talented wing. You just never know though on early entrants so UConn has to go all out for guys like Mack, Clarke and Jones. Regardless of conference affiliation right now or who UConn lands in this class the Huskies are still the equivalent of a Fortune500 company from a pure basketball perspective. UConn has 3 or 4 NBA prospects on its roster right now. Three who have legit shots at guaranteed contracts within the next year or 2.Its all about the conference. If UConn was in the ACC or another P5 conference I am pretty sure that recruiting would be a lot easier.
Not by a long shot.I guess I'm the only one who thinks part of the reason this is difficult is that these guys look at our roster and see Adams, Samuel, Calhoun, Cassell Jr., Purvis, and Hamilton all sitting there capable of playing minutes at the same positions they play.
And AJ Price had such a tough year in part because he never got his study year from Marcus Williams, who got (half) a study year under Taliek--who struggled because he never got his study year from KEA...who never needed a study year.I forgot about Waters. But that's a dangerous game to play, especially if Adams is more of a 2 guard.
In 2017-2018, this would mean your PG is Adams and Waters (a freshman) IF he commits.
And UConn has always had a study-year for frosh PGs, and that includes Kemba and Napier.
We can't forget here that Kemba was a top 3o recruit who learned from AJ Price.
And AJ Price had such a tough year in part because he never got his study year from Marcus Williams, who got (half) a study year under Taliek--who struggled because he never got his study year from KEA...who never needed a study year.![]()
And AJ Price had such a tough year in part because he never got his study year from Marcus Williams, who got (half) a study year under Taliek--who struggled because he never got his study year from KEA...who never needed a study year.![]()
Considering the overall success and prestige of the program, it's amazing how hard they seem to have to fight to get kids away from tier 2(or worse) programs.