alexrgct
RIP, Alex
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 10,091
- Reaction Score
- 15,648
Who are the teams with the most to prove this upcoming WCBB season? My thoughts (in no particular order):
Tennessee
Historically, Tennessee has been a program where championships are the expectation. I don't think too many folks outside of the Volunteer State think the LVs are headed in that direction in 2012-13, and that raises a lot of interesting questions. What kind of program does Tennessee want to be? Assuming it wants to continue being championship-caliber, how long does Holly have to prove she can get it there? Will the fanbase be understanding and patient through this transition period, or will all the team hear about be when will they win #9? A lot of those questions will be answered this season. If the LVs play consistently (something they didn't do last season) and to their abilities (ditto), I'll think Holly's on the right track. This will be a fascinating season in Knoxville.
Louisville
Jeff Walz came to Louisville as a golden boy. He's credited with helping Angel focus her talents en route to bringing Louisville to the national championship game in 2009. But here's the thing- Louisville hasn't gotten it done since. Through three years of the 2010s, they've barely registered a blip: not a single top four seed, one Sweet 16 run. Jeff Walz and/or Louisville fans will be quick to bring up post-Angel transition, injuries, etc., but this year is put up or shut up time. Otherwise, they're danger of being overshadowed by Kentucky's WBB program in their own state...if they're not already. Speaking of...
...Kentucky
Kentucky has a lot to lose all of a sudden. The Elite Eight run in 2010 was a bit of a surprise. The 2012 run was shaky at times, but ultimately they got there and gave UConn a bit of a scare in the first half. Now they're the clear favorites in the SEC (something they didn't handle well last year), and anything short of a conference championship and another run to at least the Elite Eight will be a disappointment. Can Kentucky handle the spotlight and be that kind of consistent top 10 program they look to be? Time will tell.
Notre Dame
After 2001, ND went largely AWOL for nine years before coming back strong this past few. Muffet has parlayed recent success into recruiting success. Can she then parlay that success into consistent results and challenge UConn on a regular basis going forward? Certainly, ND is nt expected to beat UConn next season, but how they compete against UConn and others may be a sign of things to come.
LSU
Nikki Caldwell is attractive and likable. She did some solid things at UCLA, but didn't stay long enough for it to be clear just how impressive that was (understandable given the raise LSU offered). In her first season at LSU, the Tigers were solid but unspectacular, ultimately losing at home in the second round of the NCAA tourney a week or so after Caldwell give birth. Now is the time for LSU to take another step forward. Nikki needs to prove she's worth 900K a year. I honestly think that investment was a bit of a gamble on LSU's part, and I'm not convinced it's going to pay off.
Duke
I said this in another thread, but this is a big year for Duke. Under Coach P, Duke has continued to recruit well and stay a top 5-10 program, but they're half a level below where they were with Gail at the helm. Under Coach G, Duke made multiple Final Fours and went to two championship games. They were the #3 program of the 2000s. This is definitely a season where Duke's goals should be a #1 seed (something they haven't had since 2009, when they were promptly upset in the second round) and a trip to the Final Four (somewhere they haven't been since 2006). They've got the talent- now it's time to deliver. And if they lose to UConn or Baylor, so be it, but they should at least be competitive.
Maryland
Speaking of 2006, Brenda Frese has been living off that season. Since then, Maryland has underachieved in the tourney several times. Even last year, where the Terps advanced according to where they'd be expected to given their seed, they looked shaky getting there. They struggled against A&M and Louisville before embarrassing themselves against Notre Dame. Brenda earns close to a million dollars per year, and for that, the Terps should have made the Final Four more than once during her tenure. This year is a golden opportunity to seize that last #1 seed (assuming Baylor, UConn, and Duke live up to their preseason expectations and grab the other three) and have a good chance to make it to New Orleans.
Who do you think has the most to prove?
Tennessee
Historically, Tennessee has been a program where championships are the expectation. I don't think too many folks outside of the Volunteer State think the LVs are headed in that direction in 2012-13, and that raises a lot of interesting questions. What kind of program does Tennessee want to be? Assuming it wants to continue being championship-caliber, how long does Holly have to prove she can get it there? Will the fanbase be understanding and patient through this transition period, or will all the team hear about be when will they win #9? A lot of those questions will be answered this season. If the LVs play consistently (something they didn't do last season) and to their abilities (ditto), I'll think Holly's on the right track. This will be a fascinating season in Knoxville.
Louisville
Jeff Walz came to Louisville as a golden boy. He's credited with helping Angel focus her talents en route to bringing Louisville to the national championship game in 2009. But here's the thing- Louisville hasn't gotten it done since. Through three years of the 2010s, they've barely registered a blip: not a single top four seed, one Sweet 16 run. Jeff Walz and/or Louisville fans will be quick to bring up post-Angel transition, injuries, etc., but this year is put up or shut up time. Otherwise, they're danger of being overshadowed by Kentucky's WBB program in their own state...if they're not already. Speaking of...
...Kentucky
Kentucky has a lot to lose all of a sudden. The Elite Eight run in 2010 was a bit of a surprise. The 2012 run was shaky at times, but ultimately they got there and gave UConn a bit of a scare in the first half. Now they're the clear favorites in the SEC (something they didn't handle well last year), and anything short of a conference championship and another run to at least the Elite Eight will be a disappointment. Can Kentucky handle the spotlight and be that kind of consistent top 10 program they look to be? Time will tell.
Notre Dame
After 2001, ND went largely AWOL for nine years before coming back strong this past few. Muffet has parlayed recent success into recruiting success. Can she then parlay that success into consistent results and challenge UConn on a regular basis going forward? Certainly, ND is nt expected to beat UConn next season, but how they compete against UConn and others may be a sign of things to come.
LSU
Nikki Caldwell is attractive and likable. She did some solid things at UCLA, but didn't stay long enough for it to be clear just how impressive that was (understandable given the raise LSU offered). In her first season at LSU, the Tigers were solid but unspectacular, ultimately losing at home in the second round of the NCAA tourney a week or so after Caldwell give birth. Now is the time for LSU to take another step forward. Nikki needs to prove she's worth 900K a year. I honestly think that investment was a bit of a gamble on LSU's part, and I'm not convinced it's going to pay off.
Duke
I said this in another thread, but this is a big year for Duke. Under Coach P, Duke has continued to recruit well and stay a top 5-10 program, but they're half a level below where they were with Gail at the helm. Under Coach G, Duke made multiple Final Fours and went to two championship games. They were the #3 program of the 2000s. This is definitely a season where Duke's goals should be a #1 seed (something they haven't had since 2009, when they were promptly upset in the second round) and a trip to the Final Four (somewhere they haven't been since 2006). They've got the talent- now it's time to deliver. And if they lose to UConn or Baylor, so be it, but they should at least be competitive.
Maryland
Speaking of 2006, Brenda Frese has been living off that season. Since then, Maryland has underachieved in the tourney several times. Even last year, where the Terps advanced according to where they'd be expected to given their seed, they looked shaky getting there. They struggled against A&M and Louisville before embarrassing themselves against Notre Dame. Brenda earns close to a million dollars per year, and for that, the Terps should have made the Final Four more than once during her tenure. This year is a golden opportunity to seize that last #1 seed (assuming Baylor, UConn, and Duke live up to their preseason expectations and grab the other three) and have a good chance to make it to New Orleans.
Who do you think has the most to prove?