- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,743
- Reaction Score
- 48,443
As I wrote in the posts above, all this is irrelevant to the discussion. I never said UConn had a global brand in the 1980s. So I don't know why people are even bringing this up.I'm not sure What you're debating here. Boston University is an even bigger Global Brand than Northeastern. Both schools have spent dozens millions of dollars on undergraduate and graduate online education. Why do you think Purdue's alumni is more than double that of Uconn ?
It has nothing to do with what I said.
I was talking about UConn's market for college athletics. UConn was always a sleeping giant back then because it had a natural market of 3.6m people, which was even more important back in the days when cable subscribers were measured state by state.
If you compared UConn's natural market to Kentucky or Iowa or Arizona or Duke, etc., UConn's market was actually bigger back then.