Starting line-up according to history

[DefenseBB]

I laugh at all these posts about Nika’s limitations on offense when the OP listed Dorka, Aaliyah, CD. Azzi and Aubrey as the starting 5 as if Aubrey isn’t MORE limited offensively than Nika (she is) while Nika can actually deliver passes and run the offense.

The last time AG suited up for a game in a UConn uniform, Dorka, Azzi, CD, Amari and Lou weren’t on the team. I see NO allegiance to AGs “senior status” (though technically a RS Junior) as she is best positioned as a substitute. I do see a rotation of 8 in tight games with hope that Ayanna improves her shooting and understanding of the offense to allow for key minutes against the top 25 teams.

My view of the starting 5 is
1. Nika 2. Azzi 3. Lou 4. Aaliyah 5. Dorka with CD first off the bench. Amari is 6’5” with an outside shooting touch so I am hoping the “sophomore jump” occurs as she could really help Dorka and Aaliyah.

 

[TeamFirst!]

I think I’ve is our starting center next year. I think the injuries mean more PT for both Ayanna and Aubrey. I think Ayanna gets a bunch of PT this year and becomes a very important part of this team.

 

[freshler40]

The best players all around are Azzi, Caroline, Aaliyah, Dorka and Lou. Nika is just too much of a liability offensively. When she subs for Azzi, the opposition can safely ignore her and double team the hot shooter. Ten minutes seems about right for Nika unless she has vastly improved her offense and can control her fouling and turnovers.

Nika provides energy and tone, she may surprise us with some serious offense as the focus will be on the shooters for UConn.

 

[Tonyc]

As far as any doubts about Amari playing. Geno says she has the talent and the practice boys say shes got the shot and now with Liv graduating and ICE going down there is no other choice to give Dorka a rest. Youve got to throw her in there and let her do her thing. Make adjustments and pump her up with confidence

 

[PvP]

Nika provides energy and tone, she may surprise us with some serious offense as the focus will be on the shooters for UConn.

Yes she may, and Inez may be named WBB Player of the Year.

 

[eebmg]

Question? What were the most surprising "starter" surprise stories to begin the season for UConn historically?

 

[CocoHusky]

I don't understand this concept that Azzi has to play SG because by playing the PG position she will be sacrificing FGA- that's just not how the offense works. As recently as 2018-19 season Crystal Dangerfield (the Starting PG) had significantly more FGA attempts (427 vs 343) when compared to Christyn Williams (the starting SG) with both players starting in all 38 games.

 

[Bone Dog]

I don't understand this concept that Azzi has to play SG because by playing the PG position she will be sacrificing FGA- that's just not how the offense works. As recently as 2018-19 season Crystal Dangerfield (the Starting PG) had significantly more FGA attempts (427 vs 343) when compared to Christyn Williams (the starting SG) with both players starting in all 38 games.

I don’t know about shot attempts. But there’s one thing to consider about Azzi at PG. Last year she was awesome at catch-and-shoot opportunities. Caroline is really good at these quick release situations too. The skill Azzi and Caroline haven’t shown us yet is the step-back 3. Paige also hasn’t shown us this either. Very few shooters in D1 can do this. Caitlin Clark has it. Aari McDonald had it. Lou2 showed this at Fairfield.

If they need a screen to shoot the 3 when they’re “on ball,” it limits their 3-pt production. I suspect this means much more of Azzi’s scoring will come from the midrange and driving to the rim. This will make her resemble Paige even more, whose game tilted toward the midrange once she was on ball.

I’m not concerned about this at all. Paige carried us in close games by getting midrange jumpers as needed, and I think Azzi can do this too. An “automatic” midrange shot — this is often how Paige seemed — can be as devastating (or encouraging depending on which team you’re on) as a 3.

In the game against SC two years ago, Paige carried the team in the 4th quarter, doing almost all the scoring in the closing minutes and in overtime. She sealed the win with an awesome 3 pt dagger in the closing seconds. But this was preceded by a series of 2s — when the team needed a bucket, Paige would get it.

Paige’s preferred midrange jumper came off a screen moving to her right. Azzi seems equally comfortable going left or right. Paige didn’t need to square up to the basket, but Azzi seems to prefer this.

 

[eebmg]

I don’t know about shot attempts. But there’s one thing to consider about Azzi at PG. Last year she was awesome at catch-and-shoot opportunities. Caroline is really good at these quick release situations too. The skill Azzi and Caroline haven’t shown us yet is the step-back 3. Paige also hasn’t shown us this either. Very few shooters in D1 can do this. Caitlin Clark has it. Aari McDonald had it. Lou2 showed this at Fairfield.

If they need a screen to shoot the 3 when they’re “on ball,” it limits their 3-pt production. I suspect this means much more of Azzi’s scoring will come from the midrange and driving to the rim. This will make her resemble Paige even more, whose game tilted toward the midrange once she was on ball.

I’m not concerned about this at all. Paige carried us in close games by getting midrange jumpers as needed, and I think Azzi can do this too. An “automatic” midrange shot — this is often how Paige seemed — can be as devastating (or encouraging depending on which team you’re on) as a 3.

In the game against SC two years ago, Paige carried the team in the 4th quarter, doing almost all the scoring in the closing minutes and in overtime. She sealed the win with an awesome 3 pt dagger in the closing seconds. But this was preceded by a series of 2s — when the team needed a bucket, Paige would get it.

Paige’s preferred midrange jumper came off a screen moving to her right. Azzi seems equally comfortable going left or right. Paige didn’t need to square up to the basket, but Azzi seems to prefer this.

I definitely recall Azzi with a dynamite step back 3 last season (once?) and I think I recall Paige doing one or 2. Just not a big thing in their arsenal the way UConn plays. Not a fan of Azzi taking 3 pt shot selection lessons from Caitlin or Aari.

Azzi definitely can take on the 1st defender off the dribble and get into the lane at will (when healthy and her mind is focused on scoring).

 

[BobbyJ]

I definitely recall Azzi with a dynamite step back 3 last season (once?) and I think I recall Paige doing one or 2. Just not a big thing in their arsenal the way UConn plays. Not a fan of Azzi taking 3 pt shot selection lessons from Caitlin or Aari.

Azzi definitely can take on the 1st defender off the dribble and get into the lane at will (when healthy and her mind is focused on scoring).

Exactly. The UConn offense isn't run to get Fudd or anybody step back 3s. That's for teams like Iowa who play a two-man offense while everybody else stands around and watches. The point @CocoHusky is trying to make is that if you want Fudd to score a lot, she needs the ball in her hands. Not standing in the corner hoping it eventually gets there.

 

[Bone Dog]

Exactly. The UConn offense isn't run to get Fudd or anybody step back 3s. That's for teams like Iowa who play a two-man offense while everybody else stands around and watches. The point @CocoHusky is trying to make is that if you want Fudd to score a lot, she needs the ball in her hands. Not standing in the corner hoping it eventually gets there.

I would never disagree with @CocoHusky on something as obviously true as this: you can't score if you don't have the ball in your hands. But there may be nuances to consider. Nor would I suggest that we run the offense to get someone step back 3s. What would that even mean? The point of a step back shot is to create the space for it off the dribble without a screen. It's the classic one-on-one move, or at best an isolation move.

But having someone who can "get their own shot" in a pinch has been mentioned here many times as a useful element of a larger scheme. If we rely exclusively on intricate set pieces, we risk becoming plodding in our offense. It's important to be able to run sets, try to induce a defensive mistake, etc.. Sometimes you just need to run some clock. But we also have thrived on being able to shift to a more disruptive style occasionally.

This may be true, too. But it wasn't my point either. I was merely thinking about what the shape of our offense might turn out to be depending on various personnel choices. If you have Azzi "on ball" more often, I suspect she'll shoot fewer 3s. I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing. It may even be better for us to leave the perimeter shooting to Caroline Lou... and Nika's occasional mortar shot. I like the idea of Azzi taking more midrange jumpers.

 

[hthusky74]

I'm not meaning to be insulting to anyone, but if you don't get that Nika is the starting point guard, you are clueless regarding basketball.

 

[SVCBeercats]

Spot on! Not playing Nika as a starter would be a poor move. She gets dinged as a poor shooter. Why? Her only problem is not shooting enough. Her 2021-22 FG% was 43% which is only 2% below Azzi's and Caroline's FG% of 45%. Many Boneyarders have expressed a 3FG% of 35% to be more than acceptable. Well, Nika shot 34% last season behind Paige 35% and Azzi 43%. So if she improves but 1% all is good. Starting Aubrey at the beginning of the season after sitting a year is not an astute move. Aubrey was a very good defender prior to her back issues. However, Nika is the reigning Big East Defender of the 2021-22 season. Aubrey was not known as a scorer.

“Nika’s that emotional driving force that pushes pur team forward. She thinks she can accomplish anything and she makes the team think like that.”

”Nika brings so much fire and intensity and aggressiveness to our team. Playing against her in 3x3, I’m like SO glad this girl is on my team because if I had to play against her, I would absolutely HATE her.”

These aren’t random Boneyard posters, first quote is Coach Auriemma, second is Azzi. These folks see Nika day in, day out, and what they’re saying doesn’t seem to me to jibe with the OP. Yea verily!!!

 

[SVCBeercats]

Sorry to have drawn the fire of Nika fans but Geno has pointed out her limitations so I'm not alone in my simply stating the facts. If it's a choice between Nika and Lou, it's no contest.

Absolutely correct! It will be Nika! Glad you agree!

 

[Bone Dog]

Spot on! Not playing Nika as a starter would be a poor move. She gets dinged as a poor shooter. Why? Her only problem is not shooting enough. Her 2021-22 FG% was 43% which is only 2% below Azzi's and Caroline's FG% of 45%. Many Boneyarders have expressed a 3FG% of 35% to be more than acceptable. Well, Nika shot 34% last season behind Paige 35% and Azzi 43%. So if she improves but 1% all is good. Starting Aubrey at the beginning of the season after sitting a year is not an astute move. Aubrey was a very good defender prior to her back issues. However, Nika is the reigning Big East Defender of the 2021-22 season. Aubrey was not known as a scorer.

I agree with you... BUT. Those stats are misleading given the role we're hoping she'll play. I'm saying this from smack in the middle of the pro-Nika camp, so bear that in mind.

The stats simply don't tell enough of the story, given the types of shots she tends to take. She shoots well enough from 3 (34% is nothing to sneeze at), but it's a mortar shot that comes from her waist. This means she needs a lot of time to get it off -- she has to be way uncovered. Compare this to the quick-release 3s from Paige or Azzi or Caroline... or Lou (we'll see a lot more of these soon enough). And Paige Azzi and Lou release the shot from above their heads. Caroline releases her 3 from her chin, which may not be optimal, but it seems to work for her, and she's also at least 4" taller than Nika. Now the fact that Nika's shot takes a long time to develop doesn't mean she shouldn't take it. But it's not a shot profile that really fits a PG. Almost all of her other made FGs come on layups off steals or breaks. She takes very few midrange shots, and makes even less of these. These ought to be her "bread and butter" in the half court offense.

I get that she's reluctant, that she's not focused on getting her own shots, etc. But if we want her to help fill the gap Paige left, she may need to take more shots. I don't even mind if she misses a lot of midrange jumpers off the dribble. The fact that she takes them will force defenses to account for her. Whenever we put Azzi on the ball, you can bet she'll take a lot of these midrange jumpers off the dribble. I hope Nika follows her example.

 

[SVCBeercats]

As far as any doubts about Amari playing. Geno says she has the talent and the practice boys say shes got the shot and now with Liv graduating and ICE going down there is no other choice to give Dorka a rest. Youve got to throw her in there and let her do her thing. Make adjustments and pump her up with confidence

Has Geno even mentioned her name in any of his interviews and pressers?

 

[Bone Dog]

As someone else pointed out somewhere, in the last couple of pressers, Geno only discussed the players he was asked about and he wasn't asked about Amari. I know, it's a thin glimmer of hope, a mere thread, but I'm clinging to it!

 

[Bald Husky]

Has Geno even mentioned her name in any of his interviews and pressers?

In the last interview I saw on YouTube last night, Geno discussed many things, including the injury to Ice. When he mentioned the Bigs, he said that Aalyah, Dorka, and Ayanna would have to step up. Never did he mention Amari, and what else is troubling, is the media did not ask about her either. I mentioned this before, and I wonder if she is actually part of the program anymore. We will need her, but why don't we hear anything about her. This just seems very weird to me.

 

[Bone Dog]

In the last interview I saw on YouTube last night, Geno discussed many things, including the injury to Ice. When he mentioned the Bigs, he said that Aalyah, Dorka, and Ayanna would have to step up. Never did he mention Amari, and what else is troubling, is the media did not ask about her either. I mentioned this before, and I wonder if she is actually part of the program anymore. We will need her, but why don't we hear anything about her. This just seems very weird to me.

That is troubling. I will be very sad if Amari has simply slipped out of the program. I will continue to hope for the best until I hear something definitive, but you have shaken my confidence.

 

[sun]

When it comes to Amari, IMO no news is good news.
Some players have mentioned that Geno seems happier & kinder this year by yelling less at the players.
That's attributed to them for all making a satisfactory personal effort.
Considering that Amari spent her summer on campus, that's one less reason for Geno to publicly criticize her desire to improve.
Losing Piath & having team injuries to deal with has probably made Geno more appreciative of his bench players.
I hope that sentiment rubs off on the fans.

 

[hoophuskee]

Exactly. The UConn offense isn't run to get Fudd or anybody step back 3s. That's for teams like Iowa who play a two-man offense while everybody else stands around and watches. The point @CocoHusky is trying to make is that if you want Fudd to score a lot, she needs the ball in her hands. Not standing in the corner hoping it eventually gets there.

Nor does it mean if she is a SG that she is just going to stand in the corner hoping for the ball.

 

[BobbyJ]

Nor does it mean if she is a SG that she is just going to stand in the corner hoping for the ball.

True, she could also waste 20 seconds of the shot clock fighting and getting grabbed around screens like Bueckers had to until Auriemma finally decided to put the ball in her hands so she could get shots.

 

[hoophuskee]

True, she could also waste 20 seconds of the shot clock fighting and getting grabbed around screens like Bueckers had to until Auriemma finally decided to put the ball in her hands so she could get shots.

True. Or she play off the ball like Bueckers did vs South Carolina in 2020-2021 while Nika was the pg for most of the game. .

 

[BobbyJ]

True. Or she play off the ball like Bueckers did vs South Carolina in 2020-2021 while Nika was the pg for most of the game. .

Well, it looks like Bueckers had the ball a lot in that game since she got 26 shots with 14 makes in that game and had 5 assists while Muhl had a total of 2 assists in 35 minutes. So it wasn't Muhl's passes that generated Bueckers' offense. Looks like it was her own playmaking.

 

[cbraarj]

I've seen some starting line-ups posts but we have to remember that Geno Auriemma puts a premium on seniors, players who understand the offense, and being able to add sparks off the bench, the starting line-up will most likely be:

Azzi Fudd
Caroline Ducharme
Aubrey Griffin
Aaliyah Edwards
Dorka Juhasz

I think it's great, Nika subs for Azzi given the point guard depth, they both shouldn't be on the floor at the same time unless it works for the matchup. Geno can choose whether he pulls Griffin or Ducharme for Lopez-Senechal or Ayanna Patterson and it all matches up. Or doesn't, you let me know.

No way Griffin starts!

 

[The deacon]

Exactly. The UConn offense isn't run to get Fudd or anybody step back 3s. That's for teams like Iowa who play a two-man offense while everybody else stands around and watches. The point @CocoHusky is trying to make is that if you want Fudd to score a lot, she needs the ball in her hands. Not standing in the corner hoping it eventually gets there.

I agree wholeheartedly with the gist of your post, BobbyJ, and eebmg before that about UConn's offense being so much different than Iowa's. However, you need to watch the Hawkeyes a bit more if you think everyone stands around except Clark and Czinano. The crucial difference is that the Huskies have more depth of talent and hence more scoring options.

 

[hoophuskee]

Well, it looks like Bueckers had the ball a lot in that game since she got 26 shots with 14 makes in that game and had 5 assists while Muhl had a total of 2 assists in 35 minutes. So it wasn't Muhl's passes that generated Bueckers' offense. Looks like it was her own playmaking.

Well,. this thread is about starting lineup. So Nika as the pg can be the starter in which Bueckers or Azzi don't have to sit in the corner is the point. A sg can put up numbers as you've just shown.