Starting Five

[KodiacKemba]

Thanks for the insightful post...

That’s what I said ....

 

[Confident Carl]

A

At this point in the season, we are 7-5 with a few days off before the matchup with Wichita State. Without using the names Gilbert or Wilson, using active players on our current roster, who would you like to see as your starting 5?

I'll wait to hear from a few folks before I post my list...

We have to score quicker and stop digging a hole getting too far behind and always playing catch up. Maybe try playing bigger instead of small ball all the time.. Although, I hesitate from what I've seen of Larriers ball handling, I thought of this starting line up.

1. Adams
2. Larrier
3. Whaley
4. Diarra
5. Carlton

Guards of bench, Anderson 1, Vital, 2
1st big off bench, Cobb, 1, Polley, 2

Some rational:

3 pt. Defense - UCONN ranks 257th in country

Assist to turnover ratio 337th in country.

Get ball into low box more. Give bigs an opportunity to score more instead of throwing it up or forcing lane penetration. This might limit turnovers and open things up for Larrier and Adams as well.

The Question is could Larrier Play the 2 Guard? Positives are his shooting ability, matchups and potential of improving perimeter D. Negatives would be ball handling and
Quickness. If he were getting beat too much you bring in a smaller quicker guard.

I also like the idea of getting young bigs more consistent playing time to gain the necessary experience to get into a position of going from good to great!

 

[Son of Robert]

A


We have to score quicker and stop digging a hole getting too far behind and always playing catch up. Maybe try playing bigger instead of small ball all the time.. Although, I hesitate from what I've seen of Larriers ball handling, I thought of this starting line up.

1. Adams
2. Larrier
3. Whaley
4. Diarra
5. Carlton

Guards of bench, Anderson 1, Vital, 2
1st big off bench, Cobb, 1, Polley, 2

Some rational:

3 pt. Defense - UCONN ranks 257th in country

Assist to turnover ratio 337th in country.

Get ball into low box more. Give bigs an opportunity to score more instead of throwing it up or forcing lane penetration. This might limit turnovers and open things up for Larrier and Adams as well.

The Question is could Larrier Play the 2 Guard? Positives are his shooting ability, matchups and potential of improving perimeter D. Negatives would be ball handling and
Quickness. If he were getting beat too much you bring in a smaller quicker guard.

I also like the idea of getting young bigs more consistent playing time to gain the necessary experience to get into a position of going from good to great!

Dude, this is a worthy lineup. Our 3 point conversion rate being what it is, and the perimeter driven offense not being that successful, this lineup could affect the game in many different ways. Worth a try for sure. Midrange/ low post scoring and perimeter defense would be necessary for this to work obviously, but I like it. I do see Cobb and Carlton being interchangeable, and the substitution pattern of Vital/Anderson is situational also.

 

[Dream Jobbed 2.0]

A


We have to score quicker and stop digging a hole getting too far behind and always playing catch up. Maybe try playing bigger instead of small ball all the time.. Although, I hesitate from what I've seen of Larriers ball handling, I thought of this starting line up.

1. Adams
2. Larrier
3. Whaley
4. Diarra
5. Carlton

Guards of bench, Anderson 1, Vital, 2
1st big off bench, Cobb, 1, Polley, 2

Some rational:

3 pt. Defense - UCONN ranks 257th in country

Assist to turnover ratio 337th in country.

Get ball into low box more. Give bigs an opportunity to score more instead of throwing it up or forcing lane penetration. This might limit turnovers and open things up for Larrier and Adams as well.

The Question is could Larrier Play the 2 Guard? Positives are his shooting ability, matchups and potential of improving perimeter D. Negatives would be ball handling and
Quickness. If he were getting beat too much you bring in a smaller quicker guard.

I also like the idea of getting young bigs more consistent playing time to gain the necessary experience to get into a position of going from good to great!

But I feel like it’s literally a turnover every time we get the ball to a big. Carlton traveling, Cobb hitting Kevin Freeman with a no-look 90 mph behind the back pass or Dave O running through defenders like they’re banners at a homecoming football game.

 

[Confident Carl]

But I feel like it’s literally a turnover every time we get the ball to a big. Carlton traveling, Cobb hitting Kevin Freeman with a no-look 90 mph behind the back pass or Dave O running through defenders like they’re banners at a homecoming football game.

LOL funny but so unfortunately true. Like I said, they have to get the playing time in. This may turn into one big exhibition season!
David O seems like a situational player only. I expected more. He's a once and done so I think Ollie should limit his playing time to
give the pups more experience. Doesn't seem to matter either way if he is in the game except for his propensity for fouling. Love to
see him as a Defensive End on the football team!

 

[Danzz]

Adams, Vital, Larrier, Cobb, Diarra. I’d play Anderson much less. I’d play DO much much less. I’d play Polley more, Whaley about the same and Carlton about the same. Give Williams a few minutes.

Kind of like your lineup but it is hard to start Diarra on a team that has trouble scoring. I'd like to see more of Polly. He looks to have nice stroke even though he hasn't made many. Would also like to see Carlton and Cobb split PT. Carlton seems to have real talent but he isn't going to develop sitting on the bench.

 

[joober jones]

This isn't a feasible starting 5, but I wish it were, as there's no way we'd get a slow effort start out of these guys:

Adams
Vital
Whaley
Diarra
Williams

With the energy and enthusiasm these other 4 players bring, Adams would be a whole lot less "lethargic". That being said, I know there's no way this lineup really could/should happen.

 

[UConnDan97]

This isn't a feasible starting 5, but I wish it were, as there's no way we'd get a slow effort start out of these guys:

Adams
Vital
Whaley
Diarra
Williams

With the energy and enthusiasm these other 4 players bring, Adams would be a whole lot less "lethargic". That being said, I know there's no way this lineup really could/should happen.

Well, we've seen Diarra play the 5 already this year. So I don't see why that line-up would be prohibitive. Yeah, you lose a shooter but you gain high energy on the boards and on defense.

It's not like we are going to nail Larrier to the bench, so I don't see any issues with starting that way...

 

[The Funster]

Adams, Vital, Larrier, Whaley, Carlton.