USC played the exact game I thought they would. Slow it down, play a half court game, try and run your sets(which is hard against Stanford as they can defend) and do your best to limit the Cardinal to as few shots as possible. USC led 44-43 with 10+ minutes left than went ice cold and hit 1 of their next 13 shots over 8+ minutes to trail 54-46. USC cant run with Stanford and cant outrebound them, although the final rebounds werent that much different, 44-40. Both teams had poor shooting, USC 31% and Stanford 37.5%. It was definetly not the same Cardinal team I saw run all over UT. However, I was not impressed with Stanfords team except the sisters and Toni Kokenis. The bench has talent but no one has really stepped up to say I want to be in there. Samuelson seems to be the first one in at present, and she can shoot the three. Tinkle/Boothe certainly havent stepped up to replace Pederson. Stanford would struggle if anything happened to Kokenis, she has a great basketball IQ, is fast and has a good touch.
USC is thin in numbers. Only 8 players left after Jacki G went down and before she went down two of those players got less than 7 minutes a game. Two others are freshmen. However they are hustling and trying more in the past three games than at any point in the previous 8 games, except the 2nd half of their win at Gonzaga where they were a posessed team. Next season they will be strong at the 3-4-5 but very inexperienced at the guards, two freshman and a sophomore that is currently making the typical mistakes a freshmen make. I would take Engeln in a trade..........oops cant make trades in college
They are 5-6 with losses to ND, Stanford(8pts), Texas AM(1 pt), Georgia(6pts) and Nebraska., and a horrible loss to Ark State, 230+ RPI. Beat Gonzaga and Fresno State and some other 100+ RPI teams. Being so thin they could wear down as conference play gets deeper, or they can continue to hustle, get at least 20 wins, and make the NCAA as a 10/11 seed...........I like to dream sometimes.