BigBird
Et In Hoc Signo Vinces
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 3,849
- Reaction Score
- 10,566
The logic of this argument could be extended to, unless you've been a professional musician you can't critique a singers performance, or unless you've been a teacher you can't critique a teachers performance, or unless you've been a president you can't critique a presidents performance. I coach and I know that I get second guessed all the time by fans/parents who for the most part know a lot less about my sport than I do. I think it's part of the deal and it's pointless to complain about it. Also, while I have faith in my coaching abilities, I make my share of of mistakes over the course of a season. No matter how accomplished you are in any field it shouldn't shield you from criticism even if a good deal of it is unfounded.
All true. There is a reason the public is admitted to sports contests. We are interested in the sports, and we like to think and talk about them, though sometimes the thinking part is under-developed. As a form of entertainment, teams hold themselves up to public scrutiny and comment. What we have often wrestled with here on the BY is the reasonable limits of criticism and inspection. We agree that there are limits, we just don't uniformly delineate them.