OT: Sorry, but it's totally revolting watching Carolina fans wear Whalers jerseys at playoff games
- Thread starter upstater
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 1,884
- Reaction Score
- 10,841
“Whaler Appropriation” is what it is. Sickening.
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2011
- Messages
- 5,990
- Reaction Score
- 15,094
The betrayal of the Whaler fans who were still turning out during the many down years forfeited that management’s right to a history in which those same fans were a significant part. In addition:
When the Browns moved to Baltimore that City fought to retain the name . Because of the Browns association with that City’s History.
The Whale is generally part of New England but specifically Connecticut’s cultural past.
So it’s cultural appropriation in the first degree.
When the Browns moved to Baltimore that City fought to retain the name . Because of the Browns association with that City’s History.
The Whale is generally part of New England but specifically Connecticut’s cultural past.
So it’s cultural appropriation in the first degree.
NowInStorrs
The truth is out there.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2017
- Messages
- 1,792
- Reaction Score
- 10,077
Or maybe people with Connecticut ties now live in the Carolinas and they want to show their Whaler fandom? Or maybe people just think the jerseys look cool. What's the big deal? It keeps the Whalers alive, even if just as a footnote in history.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2015
- Messages
- 8,508
- Reaction Score
- 74,304
What about Wolfpack games? Personally, it's cool to see there or in Bridgeport.
.-.
BoukofJames
“Business. Always business.”
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2020
- Messages
- 631
- Reaction Score
- 4,911
It would be one thing if the colors or logo were the same- that would make it more in the spirit of a traditional throwback. It just looks bizarre in a sea of red and black
I’m a rangers fan but as a Hartford-area resident it is kind of annoying to see the franchise succeed in a fast-growing sunbelt market that’s not traditionally a hockey hotbed
I’m a rangers fan but as a Hartford-area resident it is kind of annoying to see the franchise succeed in a fast-growing sunbelt market that’s not traditionally a hockey hotbed
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 30,781
- Reaction Score
- 53,898
ehhhhhh, i tell those people to eph off
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 30,781
- Reaction Score
- 53,898
Wait a second.... You're saying former Nutmeggers who live in Carolina are under some delusional spell that they're still rooting for the Whalers?
They must also love to root for the hockey team Djurgardens from Stockholm!!
.-.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 13,727
- Reaction Score
- 40,696
That’s a myth. The fans were not turning out and the Whalers were in the bottom 2-3 in attendance for years before their last season.
Hartford gave up on the franchise. Period.
SubbaBub
Your stupidity is ruining my country.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 32,589
- Reaction Score
- 26,652
Nope. They even out drew Carolina until they got good.
They had a small, older (even then) building that did not generate revenue. And they had lousy TV deal.
None of that really mattered because the ponytail sporting owner, wanted to move south. There was money to save the team and there were more than enough fans given the performance.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,599
- Reaction Score
- 5,245
Lived in Raleigh for a few years after graduation, I refused to acknowledge the change/existence and referred to them as the whalers. Did not step foot in the arena or ever watch a game to this day.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 13,727
- Reaction Score
- 40,696
Nope. You're wrong. Here are where the Whalers stacked in NHL attendance. Their last 5 seasons before their final one, they were 2nd or 3rd worst in the NHL in average attendance. Often behind expansion teams only. Tampa Bay's first season was 1992. Same for Ottawa.Nope. They even out drew Carolina until they got good.
They had a small, older (even then) building that did not generate revenue. And they had lousy TV deal.
None of that really mattered because the ponytail sporting owner, wanted to move south. There was money to save the team and there were more than enough fans given the performance.
91-92 - 10,896 (3rd lowest in NHL behind San Jose and Islanders)
92-93 - 10,144 (2nd lowest ahead of only Tampa Bay)
93-94 - 10,407 (2nd lowest ahead of only Ottawa)
94-95 - 11,835 (2nd lowest ahead of only Ottawa)
95-96 - 11,983 (3rd lowest in NHL behind Winnipeg and Islanders)
96-97 (final season) - 13,680
The fair weather fans in CT quit on the Whalers and didn't support them.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2021
- Messages
- 1,326
- Reaction Score
- 4,738
This is worse
.-.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2016
- Messages
- 4,076
- Reaction Score
- 9,330
I’m here in Raleigh. They use the old jerseys as an alternative a few times a year and sell whaler stuff all over. I personally like it as you can be more fair weather fan with the e current ties.
Dream Jobbed 2.0
“Most definitely”
- Joined
- May 3, 2016
- Messages
- 15,125
- Reaction Score
- 57,299
It’s revolting people still give a poop about a team that dipped out 25 years ago
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2021
- Messages
- 1,678
- Reaction Score
- 7,689
Did you ever stop to think that maybe the parents moved from CT to N. Carolina and are true Hartford Whaler fans as well as the older fans in the arena wearing them?
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2018
- Messages
- 2,193
- Reaction Score
- 6,852
Correct-Thanks Gov Rowland.Nope. They even out drew Carolina until they got good.
They had a small, older (even then) building that did not generate revenue. And they had lousy TV deal.
None of that really mattered because the ponytail sporting owner, wanted to move south. There was money to save the team and there were more than enough fans given the performance.
August_West
Conscience do cost
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 51,438
- Reaction Score
- 90,557
screw the hurricanes and the whale. Let’s go rangers!
.-.
HuskyHawk
The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 35,748
- Reaction Score
- 95,506
Raleigh had empty seats all through the series. It’s unworthy of an NHL franchise. Certainly unworthy of the Whalers.
The attendance was low, but some due to the size of the CC. Also, let's not forget how ownership jacked up the ticket prices 20%, eliminated partial season plans and raising the season ticket deposit by 750%. Blame ownership, not the fans
A better perspective is via attendance percentage:
86-87: 95%
90-91: 84%
91-92: 74%
92-93: 69%
93-94: 71%
94-95: 80%
95-96: 81%
96-97: 93%
'Canes.....also the perennial lowest attendance team:
2014-15: 61% - 11,000 people (if you want the numbers)
2015-16: 65%
Might want to see the attendance record of the Jets, before leaving & after....with after being around 100%
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 34,967
- Reaction Score
- 105,560
Who cares as AW said. Rangers just came back from a 3-1 deficit let’s hope they stay hot and take care of the Canes you all seem to hate!
Pgh2Storrs
In Hurley We Trust
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2017
- Messages
- 667
- Reaction Score
- 5,481
I hope Carolina wins in 4.
drayenob
2 rings baldy!
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2018
- Messages
- 823
- Reaction Score
- 14,253
They won one playoff series in their entire existence; they didn't qualify for the playoffs for 10 of 19 seasons. This was at a time when 16 of 21 teams got in every year. I used to buy the cheap seats for 8 bucks per game. They more than doubled to 20 per game within a few short years. Attendance was fine between '85 & '90 when they were "good".
| Season | GP | W | L | T | Pts | Finish | Playoffs |
| 1979–80 | 80 | 27 | 34 | 19 | 73 | 4th, Norris | Lost Preliminary Round (Montreal), 0–3 |
| 1980–81 | 80 | 21 | 41 | 18 | 60 | 5th, Norris | Did not qualify |
| 1981–82 | 80 | 21 | 41 | 18 | 60 | 5th, Adams | Did not qualify |
| 1982–83 | 80 | 19 | 54 | 7 | 45 | 5th, Adams | Did not qualify |
| 1983–84 | 80 | 28 | 42 | 10 | 66 | 5th, Adams | Did not qualify |
| 1984–85 | 80 | 30 | 41 | 9 | 69 | 5th, Adams | Did not qualify |
| 1985–86 | 80 | 40 | 36 | 4 | 84 | 4th, Adams | Won Adams Division Semi-Final (Quebec), 3–0 |
| Lost Adams Division Final (Montreal), 3–4 | |||||||
| 1986–87 | 80 | 43 | 30 | 7 | 93 | 1st, Adams | Lost Adams Division Semi-Final (Quebec), 2–4 |
| 1987–88 | 80 | 35 | 38 | 7 | 77 | 4th, Adams | Lost Adams Division Semi-Final (Montreal), 2–4 |
| 1988–89 | 80 | 37 | 38 | 5 | 79 | 4th, Adams | Lost Adams Division Semi-Final (Montreal), 0–4 |
| 1989–90 | 80 | 38 | 33 | 9 | 85 | 4th, Adams | Lost Adams Division Semi-Final (Boston), 3–4 |
| 1990–91 | 80 | 31 | 38 | 11 | 73 | 4th, Adams | Lost Adams Division Semi-Final (Boston), 2–4 |
| 1991–92 | 80 | 26 | 41 | 13 | 65 | 4th, Adams | Lost Adams Division Semi-Final (Montreal), 3–4 |
| 1992–93 | 84 | 26 | 52 | 6 | 58 | 5th, Adams | Did not qualify |
| 1993–94 | 84 | 27 | 48 | 9 | 63 | 6th, Northeast | Did not qualify |
| 1994–951 | 48 | 19 | 24 | 5 | 43 | 5th, Northeast | Did not qualify |
| 1995–96 | 82 | 34 | 39 | 9 | 77 | 4th, Northeast | Did not qualify |
| 1996–97 | 82 | 32 | 39 | 11 | 75 | 5th, Northeast | Did not qualify |
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 315
- Reaction Score
- 1,717
I'm the same way. love college and Olympic hockey but F the NHL forever.
.-.