- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 7,071
- Reaction Score
- 16,990
Funny because last year i mentioned our poor football program was a big part of why we werent invited to the acc or big 10 and i got ripped for it.
I understand your concern, but this is a fluid situation. "Coach" Pasqualoni will not be here if what we just experienced continues. The correct hire infuses life into the program quick than "Coach" Pasqualoni drained it. Also, if conference reallignment is not over (and I believe it is not), then UConn's market will be recognized as at least a suppliment to Rutgers in the NYC DMA.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
How's Edsal doing in Maryland?
Funny because last year i mentioned our poor football program was a big part of why we werent invited to the acc or big 10 and i got ripped for it.
in other words, either our hoops pedigree will take us to the promise land or the entire athletic program died last thursday night. only time will tell. seriously, i doubt immediate on field performance has that much of an influence but we will all look back on the loss to towson if cincy joins the power 5 and we are left behind.A program is more than 1 or 2 years of results. If this weren't true, Cuse and Pitt would never have been invited. On the other hand, if it isn't true, we know why Ville was invited.
in other words, either our hoops pedigree will take us to the promise land or the entire athletic program died last thursday night. only time will tell. seriously, i doubt immediate on field performance has that much of an influence but we will all look back on the loss to towson if cincy joins the power 5 and we are left behind.
i have my doubts that the big 12 will expand while the rest of the landscape remains static. they will add cincy as a reaction to further movement.
The Big 12 has proven it will never be proactive and solely reactive.
It will be much harder over time to have the same level of success we're accustomed to from the AAC. It will be more difficult to recruit. It will be more difficult to schedule, and it will be harder to get high seeds. We'll be struggling to get the money to run high level programs, too. Even to keep a guy like Ollie if he does indeed turn out to be a top flight coach. When Indiana with its $30 million in tv revenue and NC State with its $20 come calling, we have $2 million to fall back on. Nobody will say it, but it will make a difference.With the right coaches, men's and women's bb could survive in the AAC and on the national level. They could survive any weakness in UConn's football program. But the monies that the major conferences are getting from media deals is very beneficial to the various universities within those conferences. Down the road athletic programs may have to be culled because of expenses at various universities. I don't want to see UConn facing this dilemma. Furthermore UConn may not be able to afford to pay the salaries for decent bb coaches. And then those programs would spiral downhill.
It will be much harder over time to have the same level of success we're accustomed to from the AAC. It will be more difficult to recruit. It will be more difficult to schedule, and it will be harder to get high seeds. We'll be struggling to get the money to run high level programs, too. Even to keep a guy like Ollie if he does indeed turn out to be a top flight coach. When Indiana with its $30 million in tv revenue and NC State with its $20 come calling, we have $2 million to fall back on. Nobody will say it, but it will make a difference.
I thought that is what I wrote! I guess that makes me a somebody cause nobody would say it and since I said it I must not be a nobody.It will be much harder over time to have the same level of success we're accustomed to from the AAC. It will be more difficult to recruit. It will be more difficult to schedule, and it will be harder to get high seeds. We'll be struggling to get the money to run high level programs, too. Even to keep a guy like Ollie if he does indeed turn out to be a top flight coach. When Indiana with its $30 million in tv revenue and NC State with its $20 come calling, we have $2 million to fall back on. Nobody will say it, but it will make a difference.

That's what I'm saying. Reactive. Once it gets frozen out, it will react.
It would be an extreme circumstance for a current 1 loss big 12 champion to get shut out. If that were to occur, then all 1 loss teams will be shut out and I guess you can argue its well deserved. Still, I contend that the next, first pawn to be moved in future realignment won't be from the big 12. Currently, its more likely a team will leave the big 12, than join.
I ask this as somebody who doesn't follow the UConn football program that closely, so don't kill me, but, is there any chance Edsall gets the boot at Maryland this season and UConn re-hires him?
Playoff Contenders:
Alabama 13-0 (Champ)
LSU 12-1
Ohio State 12-1 (Champ)
Florida St. 12-1 (Champ)
USC 12-1 (Champ)
Out of the Running:
Texas 11-1
Michigan 12-1
Oregon 12-1
Notre Dame 11-1
Yes to first possibility. No to second.I ask this as somebody who doesn't follow the UConn football program that closely, so don't kill me, but, is there any chance Edsall gets the boot at Maryland this season and UConn re-hires him?
What does Edsall's performance at Maryland have to do with UConn?
Again, of course its possible, but extremely unlikely. In that scenario, a one loss texas team would still prob get the nod over a 1 loss lsu team, assuming texas lost in the championship and lsu couldnt even win the division. Could you come up with unique circumstances for a 1 loss oklahoma or texas getting shut out, of course you could. Its still my opinion that its less likely to occur than the big 12 initiating expansion. The only way the big 12 expands is if it feels threatened by further moves. I am pretty sure its their belief that a one loss texas team will still find its way in to the playoff.
There is no championship for Texas to lose. That's why they're hampered. That's really the whole point of what I'm saying. The other teams will have played a championship game. Texas is not in a conference with a championship.
Right, that was my mistake. I still think a one loss Texas/Ok team gets in over a 1 loss sec team unless both alabama and georgia or florida go into the championship game undefeated.
Edsal and his last five years seem to be the standard by which PP is measured by many here. Edsal had a nice little stretch, but that's it. The idea he made UCONN football relevant is ridiculous. He was a good coach, who was given a dozen years, and ended on a high note. He took over a school with a similar record, and has done worse than PP in the past two years.
PP deserved the same chance given to Edsal. Give him a couple years where the majority of his players are his own recruits. PP deserves this year at the very least.
Right, that was my mistake. I still think a one loss Texas/Ok team gets in over a 1 loss sec team unless both alabama and georgia or florida go into the championship game undefeated.
UConn, Kentucky, Duke, Kansas, North Carolina. What do they all have in common? Football will never affect our basketball wins. May change the conference, but that's it.
True, but Indiana is in the Big 10, has been for decades. They, and Kentucky and North Carolina, even Syracuse now, can get away with having crappy football. Not so sure UConn, being on the outside looking in, has the same flexibility. Furthermore, why would we want to?Indiana has a god awful football team and has for decades.