RockyMTblue2
Don't Look Up!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 22,395
- Reaction Score
- 99,201
I hit it and this fell out!
He said she was effective “kinda, for a while”.Like the narrator pointed out she held her own in the UCLA game so maybe she could be an answer but at some point she will need more experience in games to be consistent.
Ay, there's the rub. My guess is her reluctance to embrace muscular physicality in the post is an artifact of her back problems. Even if she's fully over those, the mentality they produced, won't get resolved quickly.He said she was effective “kinda, for a while”.
Amari needs to embrace the physicality in the post. The Huskies have enough wings
When did Amari hurt her back, in HS? Because she has not embraced the physicality of the game in any of her years at UConn.Ay, there's the rub. My guess is her reluctance to embrace muscular physicality in the post is an artifact of her back problems. Even if she's fully over those, the mentality they produced, won't get resolved quickly.
This guy was overly positive. DeBerry played all of 9 minutes in a couple shifts and did nothing other than commit 1 foul and 2 turnovers. As far as good shooter and passer? People are seeing what they want to see, Auriemma is dealing in reality.I think Amari is more like Dorka than she is a true post player but she didn't play for an average team out of high school that allowed her to be a guard in a center's body. Amari is a very good shooter, a decent passer but her defense is typical of a really tall player who has gotten by with just being way longer than the person she guarding. Problem is she is expected to be another player at UConn and she isn't willing to change and neither is Geno so you have a stalemate.
Any player has to be on the court to improve. They have to be on the court to work through the details and when they get them wrong they need to be coached up but still put on the court to develop. For Amari she hasn't been in that position and it is a shame because she is the only player they have right now that gives them the size they will need at some point. Like the narrator pointed out she held her own in the UCLA game so maybe she could be an answer but at some point she will need more experience in games to be consistent.
She was at UConn for 2 years before the back problem. She’s the same player now that she was before.Ay, there's the rub. My guess is her reluctance to embrace muscular physicality in the post is an artifact of her back problems. Even if she's fully over those, the mentality they produced, won't get resolved quickly.
if the huskies 'will need at some point' some theoretical special size that you desire against gigantic teams then it ain't gonna happen. they'll simply have to win with what they've got.,I think Amari is more like Dorka ...
... For Amari she hasn't been in that position and it is a shame because she is the only player they have right now that gives them the size they will need at some point. Like the narrator pointed out she held her own in the UCLA game so maybe she could be an answer but at some point she will need more experience in games to be consistent.
Bone Dog- - -I agree with your post!I think he’s mostly right, to the extent he says anything amidst a cloud of qualifications and excuses. Amari isn’t a physically aggressive player in the sense of wrestling with other bigs. In other words, she doesn't have a muscular game and likely never will. That’s obvious. She might have (and still might) develop a subtler game in the post. He’s wrong that she is quick-footed. The opposite seems to be true. The virtue of her HS years was the ability to make midrange shots — she’d catch and shoot without ever bringing the ball down — and blocking shots from behind. She has a very smooth shooting stroke. The problem is the playing time it will take to get her into the flow of the offense, and whether it’s worth the cost of her defense.
He’s also mostly right about Audi Crooks. I watched a couple of her HS games and saw right away that she had the stamina and focus to succeed at the next level. I also figured few coaches would be willing to take a chance on her — good on ISU for recognizing her. But he’s really wrong in his mea culpa on an earlier video comparing her to Ice. By the end of this year Ice will again be able to “slice and dice” Audi. If you want to see the sort of post player Ice can be and will be soon, look for the video of Ice vs Audi in a summer league game.
Back to Amari: she's not going to develop into Mama Steph, and she isn't quick enough to emulate Stewie, and she doesn't muscle up against other bigs. By the way, you know who we have on the bench for next year who can muscle up with anyone in the post? Jana El Alfy. I can't wait for her return. But a turn and shoot game with rebounding and shot blocking and high post passing skills -- that kind of game Amari probably can develop. But she needs to do it at a quicker pace than she's moving at right now.
I was under the impression this was a chronic condition that she finally addressed.She was at UConn for 2 years before the back problem. She’s the same player now that she was before.
This advice strikes me as contradictory. If she plays off her player a little she will not be able to get position for rebounds or challenging her shot. This might be okay if there was another big post player next to her (someone like Jana) who could supply the muscle, so to speak. But that's a luxury we don't really have. In the present configuration of our bench, the only way she can play is if she is willing to muscle for position.Playing her down low on defense will help. First she will have to play off her player a little to eliminate the physicality and work on getting position to block and intimidate on defense.
She was at UConn for 2 years before the back problem. She’s the same player now that she was before.
Let me explain When the ball goes down low she gives up a little room and when her player makes her move she has time to get into position to take a charge or make it difficult for her opponent to score. Her height will be her advantage in keeping her opponent honest. Watch Cardoso play not close to her opponent and still cause her opponent to miss or have her shot blocked.This advice strikes me as contradictory. If she plays off her player a little she will not be able to get position for rebounds or challenging her shot. This might be okay if there was another big post player next to her (someone like Jana) who could supply the muscle, so to speak. But that's a luxury we don't really have. In the present configuration of our bench, the only way she can play is if she is willing to muscle for position.
If Amari showed any of those moves at UConn, she'd be playing.Against my better judgment, I watched the video on YouTube. I didn’t like the video title to start with. As I watched the video, a more apt title should have been, “Amari DeBerry, a great kid, who is who she is.”
^^^ this. First thing kids are taught to do against shotblockers is to go right into them. Cardoso is letting them think they're ok. Amari has the same potential (6'9" reach). Just move a half step away.Let me explain When the ball goes down low she gives up a little room and when her player makes her move she has time to get into position to take a charge or make it difficult for her opponent to score. Her height will be her advantage in keeping her opponent honest. Watch Cardoso play not close to her opponent and still cause her opponent to miss or have her shot blocked.
In a recent post that I attempted to make, I humbly suggested that everyone should just move on.As has been posted in a couple recent Amari posts/threads: that ship has sailed.
And yet here we are.
The week long Christmas break from basketball is notorious for dusting off old and often irrelevant threads. It should all change once we have some current basketball to talk about again, which will be tomorrow around noontime.In a recent post that I attempted to make, I humbly suggested that everyone should just move on.