.....Who's played behind a piss poor offensive line. WATCH THE DAMN GAME!!!
it's not his fault we have some of the least informed football fans in the countryI bet you're thinking this thread didn't go the way you envisioned...
Somehow the hot takes on this board are worse than they were last year. It's been two games in two brand new systems and all of a sudden our best RB isn't a RB anymore, Tempo is a failure, the defensive scheme is an "FCS scheme" etc. etc.
If anything I'm embarrassed that these people are UConn football fans. My mom and sister are more knowledgeable than these guys, and to quote Chief, they are "casual fans"
There it is again, "our best RB"
WE WERE 128TH IN THE NCAA LAST YEAR!!!....in case you don't know, that is LITERALLY dead last in FBS
We don't have a good RB...period
There it is again, "our best RB"
WE WERE 128TH IN THE NCAA LAST YEAR!!!....in case you don't know, that is LITERALLY dead last in FBS
We don't have a good RB...period
From Sunday Conference Call:
Ed Daigneault @EdDaigneault 45s 45 seconds ago
Sounds like Arkeel Newsome might be a more situational player going forward. Randy Edsall says some guys are more suited to situations.
ThisIsUConnCountry @MattSchonvisky 7s 8 seconds ago
Day After Call: You may have noticed #UConnFootball RB Jason Thompson on 3rd downs yesterday-Edsall likes his ability to pass protect
it's not his fault we have some of the least informed football fans in the country
I've never claimed he's untouchable. If someone outplays him then they should get more snaps. But the notion that just changing the RB is going to fix any of our problems running the ball is ludicrous. The problems are much deeper than that. I've also never claimed to be any sort of expert, but compared to some of the posts on the board over the last couple days I might as well be Bill Belichick. I've been around football for almost 20 years in multiple capacities, so question my opinions all you'd like but there is substance behind it.None of us have enough information to say whether Hopkins or Mensah or whomever should start but the notion that Newsome is some untouchable golden boy who can't be benched is ludicrous. You guys overrate him big time because of his CT roots or something. The OP is either a family member of Newsome or his biggest fanboy. Based on Edsall's comments he may agree more with freescooter than you.
And I can guarantee you that I know more about football than you do.
they also need to read the defense better. we're doubling guys and letting the blitzing linebacker go free. that's why the backs are getting hit before the LOSThe offensive line needs to stay with their blocks better, that is a fact.
I like Newsome, but with this line, he is better out in space than inline.
I've never claimed he's untouchable. If someone outplays him then they should get more snaps. But the notion that just changing the RB is going to fix any of our problems running the ball is ludicrous. The problems are much deeper than that. I've also never claimed to be any sort of expert, but compared to some of the posts on the board over the last couple days I might as well be Bill Belichick. I've been around football for almost 20 years in multiple capacities, so question my opinions all you'd like but there is substance behind it.
Backtrack some more. OP posed a question that frankly I didn't think was crazy. You mocked those who took it seriously as uninformed mouth breathers who don't know a pigskin from a skin flick. Now that Edsall apparently is considering this you want to change the narrative and attribute things to posters they never said.
Try and be more wrong. You can't.
IMO the new system should be one that accentuates his talents not makes him regress. I thought Lashlee would bring in a system that spreads you out some and allows a back like Newsome to find a lot of space. Hopkins had a great week one. Hopkins and Mensah were solid yesterday. Newsome has yet to really find his niche in the new system.Newsome's been our best offensive player the last 2 years (behind a horrific OL), but yeah, let's bash him after 2 unproductive games in a new system.
I'm just going to put these here:Does anyone think Arkeel would be successful if he was running behind a perennial top 20 team with an OL that wasn't abused by incompetent coaching?
I don't give a rats ass how many offers Arkeel had (Donald Brown's offer list, outside a VA and a few others, wasn't that big. )
Didn't Arkeel just pass Donald for all purpose yards? That has to mean something.
By the way. I don't know more about college football than anyone on the BY.
I know it's a little bit gimmicky, but I'd like to see a little bit more of the wildcat with DW receiving the snap, BS out wide, and Arkeel in motion. There are a lot of possibilities there that the defense would have to account for.
I'm just going to put these here:
Donald Brown College Stats | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
Arkeel Newsome College Stats | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
Donald Brown was involved in the passing game very minimally. He also didn't return kicks like Arkeel did for 3 years. Brown had 9 returns total in his 3 years. Newsome had about 3 times the rec. yards that Brown did.
Please don't compare Arkeel to Donald Brown as a runner. And I like Arkeel.
Nobody in their right mind would compare the 2 as runners.
But in terms of value there is no need for anyone to say Arkeel is not a talented athlete.
If Arkeel ran behind the same OL as Donald did, I think Arkeel would be grouped on the same level as Todman and Dixon
None of us have enough information to say whether Hopkins or Mensah or whomever should start but the notion that Newsome is some untouchable golden boy who can't be benched is ludicrous. You guys overrate him big time because of his CT roots or something. The OP is either a family member of Newsome or his biggest fanboy. Based on Edsall's comments he may agree more with freescooter than you.
And I can guarantee you that I know more about football than you do.
You're ridiculous.
Name one person here who said that nobody should get reps besides Newsome. Seriously, name one. I'll wait.
The howling that is going on right now is to defend the fact that for 3+ years, the guy had been a very good player for us. Despite that, I'm seeing clowns here say that he's no good, or allude to the fact that he wouldn't play on any other team. Which is stupid, because it's not true.
And I can guarantee you that I know more about football than you do (of course nobody here can do that, but since you feel like making claims you can't back up, I'll follow suit)...