- Joined
- Jan 6, 2015
- Messages
- 7,314
- Reaction Score
- 59,815
I'd like to thank the possible ice storm for keeping me home on this commute and allowing me time to work on this prior to my first classes.
Villanova: 16-6, 9-3 in Big East play, 8th in KenPom rating
Schedule Analysis:
Offense: 6th in KenPom efficiency
Defense: 21st in KenPom efficiency
Summary:
In their last four losses, Villanova averaged 24% (26-108) from three, so attacking the perimeter without sleeping on backdoor cuts is the key. If I’m the coach: Sanogo plays 100% of the time Dixon is on the floor but then when he’s off, play Whaley at the 5. On the defensive end, Whaley could be a huge factor combining his length, athleticism and hedging IQ to make up his perimeter D and rim protection.
Huskies!!!
Villanova: 16-6, 9-3 in Big East play, 8th in KenPom rating
Schedule Analysis:
- 7th toughest schedule in nation
- 16th toughest OOC schedule in nation, with only one high major team playing a tougher OOC schedule (Alabama).
- Best OOC win: 71-53 over Tennessee
- OOC losses to Baylor (36-57), Purdue (74-80) and UCLA (77-86 in OT).
- Lost two of last five, both to Marquette.
- First game: 54-57 at Nova. Marquette hit 45% of their threes while Gillespie went 4-13 from the field. As a team, Nova hit 25% of their threes.
- Second game: 73-83 at Marquette. Marquette hit 42% of their threes and 64% of their twos. Moore went 2-11 from the field and Nova hit just 29% of their threes.
- Jay Wright is expanding his rotations a little bit, but the core is still his top-six players.
- Bryan Antoine has had his role expand the most. He’s played 15+ minutes in five of his last eight games, however, he’s been out the last two games with an ankle injury
- Jordan Longino has played four 10+ minute games in the last nine games, all of which were dominant wins.
- None of Nova’s players are “small”, with Gillespie (6’3 195) their smallest player. All other players in their top-six are 6’4+ and 210+
- Their big lineup includes Gillespie, Moore, Slater, Samuels and Dixon, which has been the lineup Wright has used 2nd most over the last five games, for 12.9% of possessions
- Their most common lineup is their “small” lineup with Gillespie/Daniels/Moore in their backcourt and Samuels/Slater as their frontcourt (21.5% of possessions over their last five games). With our size, not sure how much we’ll see their lineup, though.
Offense: 6th in KenPom efficiency
- Gillespie (17.1 ppg) and Moore (15.1 ppg) are their top scorers. The other four in their top-six average between 8.6-10 ppg
- Their offense looks like a typical Jay Wright offense
- Incredibly slow (8th slowest offensive pace in the nation)
- Shoot a ton of threes: 46% of their shots are from three (25th in nation)
- #1 in the country ini FT% (82.5%)
- They don’t make mistakes (13th lowest turnover rate)
- Not good 2p%: 49.6% is 171st in nation.
- They don’t get to the line that often (217th highest FTA/FGA rate)
Defense: 21st in KenPom efficiency
- According to KenPom, this is Wright’s most efficient defense since the 17-18 season. To put that in perspective, last year’s team was ranked 66th in efficiency.
- Villanova forces teams to shoot jump shots (opponents attempt 42.8% of their shots from three, which is the 50th most in the nation)
- 67th in opponent 3p% (31%)
- 89th in opponent 2p% (47.5%)
- 66th in preventing teams from getting to the line (25.1% FTA/FGA ratio)
- When they foul, they tend to foul good free-throw shooters (75.5 opponent ft%)
- They are not reliant on causing TOs as part of their defense (120th in turnover%)
- Three Wildcats average 1.0+ steals/game (Moore, Slater, Gillespie)
- Samuels is their only player who averages 0.5 blocks/game (he averages 0.8).
- A solid, but not elite defensive rebounding team (106tn in nation).
Summary:
In their last four losses, Villanova averaged 24% (26-108) from three, so attacking the perimeter without sleeping on backdoor cuts is the key. If I’m the coach: Sanogo plays 100% of the time Dixon is on the floor but then when he’s off, play Whaley at the 5. On the defensive end, Whaley could be a huge factor combining his length, athleticism and hedging IQ to make up his perimeter D and rim protection.
Huskies!!!