SCOTUS NCAA ruling | Page 2 | The Boneyard

SCOTUS NCAA ruling

Blow it all up. Don't offer athletic scholarships at all and if an athlete chooses to play a sport and makes a name for himself, then let he or she cash in on it if they can. And . . . if a QB or RB cash in, do they need to pay out fees to their OL?
 
Blow it all up. Don't offer athletic scholarships at all and if an athlete chooses to play a sport and makes a name for himself, then let he or she cash in on it if they can. And . . . if a QB or RB cash in, do they need to pay out fees to their OL?

This is a total sane and rational response yes, you clearly have a solid head on your shoulders with a well formed brain inside
 
yeah there’s enough money to go around.

bouknight can benefit from his name being sold on a jersey and UConn can benefit. Win-win.
What about his teammates? Maybe Bouk is getting to many shots and keeping someone else from cashing in.
 
Agreed. Coaches should also be professors. All games should be on free, broadcast tv, no ads in stadiums, no commercials on tv, tickets 5 cents
lol
 
.-.
What about his teammates? Maybe Bouk is getting to many shots and keeping someone else from cashing in.

How does it work in high school when a player gets a scholarship offer? What about his teammates that helped him get there?
 
I wonder if NIL reform can make up some of the potential shortfall?

FWIW, I wonder if this decision plus the NIL is effectively the death knell of the NCAA.
Yeah, I wonder that too. The NCAA can still administer D-3 but I rather doubt much else.
 
The CFB business model will most likely work only for the top two thirds of the P5 and a few other schools. Increasing costs for other schools will only hasten the demise of a lot of programs in FBS that do not find themselves in the first group.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,296
Messages
4,561,817
Members
10,457
Latest member
Storytory


Top Bottom