- Joined
- Aug 2, 2015
- Messages
- 4,200
- Reaction Score
- 9,498
I don't think we're going to have to worry about the SOS.I understand your designation of “100+ points against 3 straight opponents” but would point out that our next opponents, South Dakota State, is generally year in and year out, better than P-5 Clemson.
For our SOS, I hope Clemson ends up a Quad 2 and SDS as a Quad 1 (SDS is presently a Quad 1 in RPI {28} but not in NET {38}though it’s gonna be tough for the latter because we are playing them at home.)
Somebody with talent is gonna bring a slowdown game against us. I hope we can be disciplined enough to beat it.
I think overall teams are probably still going to want to make Raven, Hall and Fulwiley win the game from the perimeter in the half court. That's the poison I'd choose.
I will say that the classic South Carolina problem has been that we put good players on the floor who in the end weren't always willing scorers. That's not the issue last year.
It obviously has been an extremely unselfish squad this year, but being baited into quick shots could be an issue. They took some very early and not so great threes vs Clemson. Not a problem but something to worry about maybe evolving into one.
Other than that I think you have to have some concern about penetrating guards surrounded by shooters. Dawn talked about that a lot this week.