Rock Star AD? | The Boneyard

Rock Star AD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chief00
  • Start date Start date
jackl said:
WTF are you gentlemen so excited about? I'm in the dark right now. Please explain!!! GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!!!
Expand ...
Original post is hopeful that DB pulls off the re-schedule of the USF games along with shots at Warde Manual and Susan Herbst.

Post 2 is the thread police chastising original poster for starting a new thread when there is another thread about this.

Post 3 is a shot at the original poster. You need to use the search function to understand the reference.

Post 4 and 6 continue to mock and belittle the creation of a new thread while shamelessly pandering to the board owner.

Post 5, you are confused.

Hope this helps and that it was not covered in any prior thread.
 
06029 said:
Original post is hopeful that DB pulls off the re-schedule of the USF games along with shots at Warde Manual and Susan Herbst.

Post 2 is the thread police chastising original poster for starting a new thread when there is another thread about this.

Post 3 is a shot at the original poster. You need to use the search function to understand the reference.

Post 4 and 6 continue to mock and belittle the creation of a new thread while shamelessly pandering to the board owner.

Post 5, you are confused.

Hope this helps and that it was not covered in any prior thread.
Expand ...
Not sure I am mocking the creation of a new thread, but more so questioning the need felt by some to whine about the new thread. Its not like it costs additional money. But here we are at post #8.
 
06029 said:
Post 2 is the thread police chastising original poster for starting a new thread when there is another thread about this.
Expand ...

It was moreso that the entire content of the original post was a dumb one-liner that serves no purpose in a separate thread other than to fuel OP's ridiculous desire for attention and narcissistic need to have his ego constantly stroked.
 
Stairmaster said:
It was moreso that the entire content of the original post was a dumb one-liner that serves no purpose in a separate thread other than to fuel OP's ridiculous desire for attention and narcissistic need to have his ego constantly stroked.
Expand ...

The response to the OP was moreso that the entire content of the first response was a dumb one-liner that serves no purpose as a response other than to fuel the repliers ridiculous desire for attention and narcissistic need to have his ego constantly stroked??
 
Update based on the subsequent posts for those still confused and omitting the useless posts:
Original post is hopeful that DB pulls off the re-schedule of the USF games along with shots at Warde Manual and Susan Herbst.

Post 2 is the thread police chastising original poster for starting a new thread when there is another thread about this.

Post 3 is a shot at the original poster. You need to use the search function to understand the reference.

Post 4 is not a mock but is shameless pandering to the board owner.

Post 5, you are confused.

Post 6 may or may not be a mock and belittles the creation of a new thread but does shamelessly pander to the board owner.

Post 9 is a pivot from post 2. It is clear the author of post 2 and post 9 has issues with the original poster that extends beyond "thread clutter". (Editorial aside - I sense a cat fight coming!)

Post 12 is an important post as a new contributor to this thread accuses the author of thread 2 of the same high thread crime the original poster was accused of in post 9.

This could escalate quickly! We may need to call in the board national guard.
 
jackl said:
WTF are you gentlemen so excited about? I'm in the dark right now. Please explain!!! GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!!!
Expand ...

06029's original post was funny, but your post still wins the thread for me. Despite the confusion, you end your statement with an emphatic "GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!". I love it. "Like" awarded... :cool:

(p.s., in order to help 06029 with his updates, this is post #14, and its summary is "overly excitable guy happy with other overly excitable guy getting overly excited")
 
UConnDan97 said:
06029's original post was funny, but your post still wins the thread for me. Despite the confusion, you end your statement with an emphatic "GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!". I love it. "Like" awarded... :cool:

(p.s., in order to help 06029 with his updates, this is post #14, and its summary is "overly excitable guy happy with other overly excitable guy getting overly excited")
Expand ...
I will incorporate into my next update. Astute observation.

Maybe I should start a new thread? This one is getting confusing.
 
06029 said:
Update based on the subsequent posts for those still confused and omitting the useless posts:
Original post is hopeful that DB pulls off the re-schedule of the USF games along with shots at Warde Manual and Susan Herbst.

Post 2 is the thread police chastising original poster for starting a new thread when there is another thread about this.

Post 3 is a shot at the original poster. You need to use the search function to understand the reference.

Post 4 is not a mock but is shameless pandering to the board owner.

Post 5, you are confused.

Post 6 may or may not be a mock and belittles the creation of a new thread but does shamelessly pander to the board owner.

Post 9 is a pivot from post 2. It is clear the author of post 2 and post 9 has issues with the original poster that extends beyond "thread clutter". (Editorial aside - I sense a cat fight coming!)

Post 12 is an important post as a new contributor to this thread accuses the author of thread 2 of the same high thread crime the original poster was accused of in post 9.

This could escalate quickly! We may need to call in the board national guard.
Expand ...

I take issue with the shameless pandering charge. If a fee per new thread is going to be implemented, then the board owner needs to advise on how we can do that. It's not pandering to reference a guy who is likely to be irritated by it more than anything else.
 
Stairmaster said:
It was moreso that the entire content of the original post was a dumb one-liner that serves no purpose in a separate thread other than to fuel OP's ridiculous desire for attention and narcissistic need to have his ego constantly stroked.
Expand ...

Of which we gave to him. /thread
 
06029 said:
I will incorporate into my next update. Astute observation.

Maybe I should start a new thread? This one is getting confusing.
Expand ...

I think you should summarize every thread on here like this. You seem to have a real knack for it. :D
 
minidarren said:
I couldn't imagine the wasteland this place would be without them.
Expand ...

As apposed to how it is with them? Have you seen the Non-Key Tweets thread on the Conference Realignment board? ;)
 
I think everyone can agree that the rock star designation for Warde Manuel was ever so slightly over the top. I have a friend who's a Michigan man who returned to going to Mass after 20 years to pray for the health of their coaching staffs so the Rock Star doesn't ever have to make a hire.
 

Online statistics

Members online
225
Guests online
2,064
Total visitors
2,289
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Share This Page

Forum statistics

Threads
164,148
Messages
4,384,745
Members
10,187
Latest member
Dogboi15


.
..
Top Bottom