C
Chief00
If Dave pulls this off, Susan's finally got her "Rock Star" AD!
Stainmaster
Occasionally Constructive
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2014
- Messages
- 21,999
- Reaction Score
- 41,479
This is definitely worthy of its own thread.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2016
- Messages
- 4,101
- Reaction Score
- 20,957
Please update once you've confirmed it at Blaze with Corey Edsall
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,670
- Reaction Score
- 6,550
How much money does each new thread cost?
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Messages
- 697
- Reaction Score
- 829
WTF are you gentlemen so excited about? I'm in the dark right now. Please explain!!! GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!!!
HuskyHawk
The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 32,776
- Reaction Score
- 85,245
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2011
- Messages
- 1,486
- Reaction Score
- 2,591
Original post is hopeful that DB pulls off the re-schedule of the USF games along with shots at Warde Manual and Susan Herbst.
Post 2 is the thread police chastising original poster for starting a new thread when there is another thread about this.
Post 3 is a shot at the original poster. You need to use the search function to understand the reference.
Post 4 and 6 continue to mock and belittle the creation of a new thread while shamelessly pandering to the board owner.
Post 5, you are confused.
Hope this helps and that it was not covered in any prior thread.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,670
- Reaction Score
- 6,550
Not sure I am mocking the creation of a new thread, but more so questioning the need felt by some to whine about the new thread. Its not like it costs additional money. But here we are at post #8.
Stainmaster
Occasionally Constructive
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2014
- Messages
- 21,999
- Reaction Score
- 41,479
It was moreso that the entire content of the original post was a dumb one-liner that serves no purpose in a separate thread other than to fuel OP's ridiculous desire for attention and narcissistic need to have his ego constantly stroked.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2011
- Messages
- 1,486
- Reaction Score
- 2,591
But were you shamelessly pandering?
Never question the thread police. Without them, there would be chaos.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,670
- Reaction Score
- 6,550
I couldn't imagine the wasteland this place would be without them.
Chin Diesel
Power of Love
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 33,426
- Reaction Score
- 104,650
The response to the OP was moreso that the entire content of the first response was a dumb one-liner that serves no purpose as a response other than to fuel the repliers ridiculous desire for attention and narcissistic need to have his ego constantly stroked??
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2011
- Messages
- 1,486
- Reaction Score
- 2,591
Update based on the subsequent posts for those still confused and omitting the useless posts:
Original post is hopeful that DB pulls off the re-schedule of the USF games along with shots at Warde Manual and Susan Herbst.
Post 2 is the thread police chastising original poster for starting a new thread when there is another thread about this.
Post 3 is a shot at the original poster. You need to use the search function to understand the reference.
Post 4 is not a mock but is shameless pandering to the board owner.
Post 5, you are confused.
Post 6 may or may not be a mock and belittles the creation of a new thread but does shamelessly pander to the board owner.
Post 9 is a pivot from post 2. It is clear the author of post 2 and post 9 has issues with the original poster that extends beyond "thread clutter". (Editorial aside - I sense a cat fight coming!)
Post 12 is an important post as a new contributor to this thread accuses the author of thread 2 of the same high thread crime the original poster was accused of in post 9.
This could escalate quickly! We may need to call in the board national guard.
Original post is hopeful that DB pulls off the re-schedule of the USF games along with shots at Warde Manual and Susan Herbst.
Post 2 is the thread police chastising original poster for starting a new thread when there is another thread about this.
Post 3 is a shot at the original poster. You need to use the search function to understand the reference.
Post 4 is not a mock but is shameless pandering to the board owner.
Post 5, you are confused.
Post 6 may or may not be a mock and belittles the creation of a new thread but does shamelessly pander to the board owner.
Post 9 is a pivot from post 2. It is clear the author of post 2 and post 9 has issues with the original poster that extends beyond "thread clutter". (Editorial aside - I sense a cat fight coming!)
Post 12 is an important post as a new contributor to this thread accuses the author of thread 2 of the same high thread crime the original poster was accused of in post 9.
This could escalate quickly! We may need to call in the board national guard.
UConnDan97
predicting undefeated seasons since 1983
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2012
- Messages
- 12,339
- Reaction Score
- 46,008
06029's original post was funny, but your post still wins the thread for me. Despite the confusion, you end your statement with an emphatic "GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!". I love it. "Like" awarded...
(p.s., in order to help 06029 with his updates, this is post #14, and its summary is "overly excitable guy happy with other overly excitable guy getting overly excited")
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2011
- Messages
- 1,486
- Reaction Score
- 2,591
I will incorporate into my next update. Astute observation.06029's original post was funny, but your post still wins the thread for me. Despite the confusion, you end your statement with an emphatic "GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!". I love it. "Like" awarded...
(p.s., in order to help 06029 with his updates, this is post #14, and its summary is "overly excitable guy happy with other overly excitable guy getting overly excited")
Maybe I should start a new thread? This one is getting confusing.
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 13,362
- Reaction Score
- 33,634
Post #16
I hate all of you.
I hate all of you.
HuskyHawk
The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 32,776
- Reaction Score
- 85,245
I take issue with the shameless pandering charge. If a fee per new thread is going to be implemented, then the board owner needs to advise on how we can do that. It's not pandering to reference a guy who is likely to be irritated by it more than anything else.
Of which we gave to him. /thread
Husky25
Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
- Messages
- 18,557
- Reaction Score
- 19,546
But is it worth seven?
IMind
Wildly Inaccurate
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 1,868
- Reaction Score
- 2,616
I think you should summarize every thread on here like this. You seem to have a real knack for it.
IMind
Wildly Inaccurate
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 1,868
- Reaction Score
- 2,616
As apposed to how it is with them? Have you seen the Non-Key Tweets thread on the Conference Realignment board?
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2011
- Messages
- 1,486
- Reaction Score
- 2,591
Only if I get $0.25 per thread.I think you should summarize every thread on here like this. You seem to have a real knack for it.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 12,858
- Reaction Score
- 21,377
I think everyone can agree that the rock star designation for Warde Manuel was ever so slightly over the top. I have a friend who's a Michigan man who returned to going to Mass after 20 years to pray for the health of their coaching staffs so the Rock Star doesn't ever have to make a hire.